Seminars in Neurosurgery 2002; 13(2): 179-190
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-35815
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Surgical Approaches and Complications

Neil Duggal, Mauricio Campos
  • Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 November 2002 (online)

ABSTRACT

Selecting the most appropriate surgical approach to the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) is based on minimizing the associated morbidity and maximizing the operative exposure in relation to the size, pathology, and specific location of the lesion. With the evolving repertoire of modern neurosurgical techniques, direct access to the CVJ can be attained along all 360 degrees of the occipital-spinal axis.

Anterior-superior approaches to the CVJ, which include the transoral approach, are best suited for extradural, midline lesions of the clivus and upper cervical vertebrae. Anterior lesions that have a paramedian location or extend inferiorly from the CVJ may be exposed by either a retropharyngeal or mandibular swing approach. The lateral approaches to the CVJ include the lateral transcervical, transpetrosal, and infratemporal fossa approaches. These approaches are particularly well suited for ventrally situated intradural lesions. Finally, posterior approaches are preferred for midline posterior or posterolaterally situated intradural lesions. The far lateral approach provides direct access to the lower ventral brainstem and the anterior foramen magnum while minimizing the need for retraction. The following article is a synopsis of the most common surgical approaches.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Bonkowski J A, Gibson R D, Snape L. Foramen magnum meningiomas: transoral resection with a bone baffle to prevent CSF leakage.  Case report. J Neurosurg . 1990;  72 493-496
  • 2 Koksel T, Crockard H A. `Clivus' through the eyes of the transoral surgeon.  Turk Neurosurg . 1990;  1 146-150
  • 3 Crockard H A. Transoral surgery: some lessons learned.  Br J Neurosurg . 1995;  9 283-293
  • 4 DeOliveira E, Rhoton Jr L A, Peace D. Microsurgical anatomy of the region of the foramen magnum.  Surg Neurol . 1985;  24 293-352
  • 5 Hadley M N, Spetzler R F, Sonntag V KH. The transoral approach to the superior cervical spine. A review of 53 cases of extradural cervicomedullary compression.  J Neurosurg . 1989;  71 16-23
  • 6 Chaljule A, Van Fleet R, Geinito Jr C F. MRI of clival and paraclival lesions.  Am J Radiol . 1992;  159 1069-1074
  • 7 Crockard H A, Calder I, Ransford A O. One stage transoral decompression and posterior fixation in rheumatoid atlanto-axial subluxation.  J Bone Joint Surg Br . 1990;  72B 682-685
  • 8 Dickman C A, Spetzler R F, Sonntag V KH, Apostolides P J. Transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction. In: Dickman CA, Spetzler RF, Sonntag, eds. Surgery of the Craniocervical Junction New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc 1997: 355-369
  • 9 Di Lorenzo N. Craniocervical junction malformation treated by transoral approach: a survey of 25 cases with emphasis on postoperative instability and outcome.  Acta Neurochir (Wien) . 1992;  118 112-116
  • 10 Dickman C A, Crawford N R, Brantley A GU. Biomechanical effects of transoral odontoidectomy.  Neurosurgery . 1995;  36 1146-1153
  • 11 Veres R, Bago A, Fedorcsak I. Early experiences with image-guided transoral surgery for the pathologies of the upper cervical spine.  Spine . 2001;  26 1385-1388
  • 12 Pollack I F, Welch W, Jacobs G B, Janecka I P. Frameless stereotactic guidance and intraoperative adjunct in the transoral approach for ventral cervicomedullary junction decompression.  Spine . 1995;  20 216-220
  • 13 Dyer P V, Patel N, Pell G M, Cummins B, Sandemann D R. The ISG viewing wand: an application to atlanto-axial cervical surgery using the Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy.  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1995;  33 370-374
  • 14 Rhoton Jr A L. Anatomical basis of surgical approaches to the region of the foramen magnum. In: Dickman CA, Spetzler RF, Sonntag VKH, eds. Surgery of the Craniovertebral Junction New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc 1998: 13-57
  • 15 Menezes A H, VanGilder J C. Transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the anterior craniocervical junction. Ten year experience with 72 patients.  J Neurosurg . 1988;  69 895-903
  • 16 James D, Crockard H A. Surgical access to the base of skull and upper cervical spine by exterior maxillotomy.  Neurosurgery . 1991;  29 411-416
  • 17 Brown A M, Lavery K M, Millar B G. The transfacial approach to the postnasal space and retromaxillary structures.  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1999;  29 230-236
  • 18 Weissler M C. Transoral approaches to the skull base.  Ear Nose Throat J . 1991;  70 587-592
  • 19 McAfee P, Bohlman H, Riley L. The anterior retropharyngeal approach to the upper part of the cervical spine.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1987;  69[Am] 1371-1383
  • 20 Grodinsky M, Holyoke E. The fasciae and fascial spaces of the head, neck and adjacent regions.  Am J Anat . 1938;  63 367-408
  • 21 Shucart W A, Borden J A. Lateral approaches to the cervical spine. In: Menezes AH, Sonntag VKH, eds. Principles of Spinal Surgery New York: McGraw-Hill 1996: 1325-1332
  • 22 Verbiest H. A lateral approach to the cervical spine: technique and indications.  J Neurosurg . 1968;  28 191-203
  • 23 Shucart W, Kleriga E. A lateral approach to the upper cervical spine.  Neurosurgery . 1980;  6 278-281
  • 24 House W F. Translabyrinthine approach. In: House WF, Leutje CM, eds. Acoustic Tumors Vol. 2: Management. Baltimore: University Park Press 1979: 43-87
  • 25 House W F, Hitselberger W E. The transcochlear approach to the skull base.  Arch Otolaryngol . 1976;  102 334-342
  • 26 Daspit C P, Spetzler R F. The petrosal approach. In: Brackmann DE, Shelton C, Arriaga M, eds. Otologic Surgery Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1994: 667-689
  • 27 Sen C N, Sekhar L N. The subtemporal and preauricular infratemporal approach to intradural structures ventral to the brain stem.  J Neurosurg . 1990;  73 345-354
  • 28 Matsushima T, Rhoton Jr L A, Oliveira E. Microsurgical anatomy of the veins of the posterior fossa.  J Neurosurg . 1983;  59 63-105
  • 29 Wen H T, Rhoton A L. Microsurgical anatomy extensions of the transcondylar, supracondylar and paracondylar far lateral approach.  J Neurosurg . 1997;  87 555-585
  • 30 Down G C, Zeiller S. Far lateral transcondylar approach: dimensional anatomy.  Neurosurg . 1999;  45 95-100
  • 31 Baldwin H Z, Miller C F, Van Loveren R H. The far lateral/combined supra- and infratentorial approach. A human cadaveric prosection model for routes of access to the petroclival region and ventral brain stem.  J Neurosurg . 1994;  81 60-68
  • 32 Vishteh A G, Crawford N R, Melton M S, Spetzler R F, Sonntag V KH, Dickman C A. Stability of the craniovertebral junction after unilateral occipital condyle resection: a biomechanical study.  J Neurosurg . 1999;  91-98
  • 33 Rhoton A L. The far-lateral approach and its transcondylar, supracondylar and paracondylar extensions.  Neurosurgery . 2000;  47 S195-S209
    >