Download PDF
Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2002; 4(3): 360-366
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-32326
Original Paper
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ·New York

Are Nectar Sugar Composition and Corolla Tube Length Related to the Diversity of Insects that Visit Asteraceae Flowers?

C. Torres, L. Galetto
  • Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba-CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina
Further Information

Publication History

June 13, 2001

January 4, 2002

Publication Date:
20 June 2002 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

In this work, we analysed interspecific variation in nectar sugar composition, corolla tube length, and the diversity of floral visitors of 35 Asteraceae species. The potential correlations between these variables could arise either as a result of selection to improve pollinator attractiveness or simply as a consequence of phylogenetic constraints. Samples of nectar and flowers, and data on floral visitors, were obtained from living plants in natural populations from Argentina. Asteraceae species showed a large variability in corolla tube length. Nectar of most species presented a larger proportion of hexoses than sucrose. All species were visited by numerous insects belonging to ≥ 2 different orders. Results showed that floral traits are not significantly correlated with the diversity of floral visitors. These characters seem to be linked to the phylogeny of the species. Early branching species (species phylogenetically close to the root of the Asteraceae tree) tend to have longer corollas, higher sucrose proportions and lesser diversity of floral visitors than late branching species. Considering that longer corolla tubes and higher nectar sucrose percentages may indicate some specialization in the pollination system, we suggest that there is an evolutionary tendency toward generalist pollination systems within the family.

Key words

Compositae - generalization - nectar - corolla depth - phylogenetic constraints - floral visitors - pollination

References

  • 01 Armbruster,  W. S.. (1996) Evolution of floral morphology and function: an integrative approach to adaptation, constraint, and compromise in Dalechampia (Euphorbiaceae). Floral biology. Studies of floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Lloyd, D. G. and Barrett, S. C. H., eds. New York; Chapman and Hall pp. 241-272
    Google Scholar
  • 02 Armbruster,  W. S., and Baldwin,  B. G.. (1998);  Switch from specialised to generalised pollination.  Nature. 394 632
    Google Scholar
  • 03 Baker,  H. G., and Baker,  I.. (1983 a) A brief historical review of the chemistry of floral nectar. The biology of nectaries. Bentley, B. and Elias, T. S., eds. New York; Columbia University Press pp. 126-152
    Google Scholar
  • 04 Baker,  H. G., and Baker,  I.. (1983 b) Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type. Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. Jones, C. E. and Little, R. J., eds. New York; Van Nostrand Reinhold pp. 117-141
    Google Scholar
  • 05 Baker,  H. G., and Baker,  I.. (1990);  The predictive value of nectar chemistry to the recognition of pollinator types.  Israel Journal of Botany. 39 157-166
    Google Scholar
  • 06 Baker,  H. G.,, Baker,  I.,, and Hodges,  S. A.. (1998);  Sugar composition of nectars and fruits consumed by birds and bats in the tropics and subtropics.  Biotropica. 30 559-586
    Google Scholar
  • 07 Bernardello,  G.,, Galetto,  L.,, Jaramillo,  J.,, and Grijalba,  E.. (1994);  Floral nectar chemical composition of some species from Reserva Río Guajalito, Ecuador.  Biotropica. 26 113-116
    Google Scholar
  • 08 Bernardello,  G.,, Galetto,  L.,, and Forcone,  A.. (1999);  Floral nectar chemical composition of some species from Patagonia, II.  Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 27 779-790
    Google Scholar
  • 09 Bremer,  K.. (1996) Major clades and grades of the Asteraceae. compositae: Systematics. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew, 1994, Vol. 1. Hind, D. J. N. and Beentje, H. J., eds. Kew; Royal Botanic Gardens pp. 1-7
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Dafni,  A., and Neal,  P. R.. (1997);  Size and shape in floral advertisement: Measurement, concepts and implications.  Acta Horticulturae. 437 121-140
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Downs,  C. T., and Perrin,  M. R.. (1996);  Sugar preferences of some southern African nectarivorous birds.  Ibis. 138 455-459
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Faegri,  K., and van der Pijl,  L.. (1966) The Principles of Pollination Ecology. Oxford; Pergamon
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Fenster,  C. B.. (1991);  Selection on floral morphology by hummingbirds.  Biotropica. 23 98-101
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Freeman,  C. E., and Worthington,  R. D.. (1985);  Some floral nectar-sugar compositions of species from south eastern Arizona and south western New Mexico.  Madroño. 32 78-86
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Galen,  C.. (1999);  Why do flowers vary? The functional ecology of variation in flower size and form within natural plant populations.  BioScience. 49 631-640
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Galetto,  L.. (1993) Estudios sobre el néctar en Asteridae argentinas: análisis químico e histología comparada de las estructuras secretoras. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Ph. D. dissertation
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Galetto,  L.. (1995);  Estudios sobre el néctar y los nectarios en Hyaloseris rubicunda y Barnadesia odorata (Asteraceae-Mutisieae).  Darwiniana. 33 127-133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Galetto,  L.,, Bernardello,  G.,, Isele,  I. C.,, Vesprini,  J.,, Speroni,  G.,, and Berduc,  A.. (2000);  Reproductive biology of Erythrina crista-galli (Fabaceae).  Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 87 127-145
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gottsberger,  G.,, Schrauwen,  J.,, and Linskens,  H. F.. (1984);  Amino acids and sugars in nectar, and their putative evolutionary significance.  Plant Systematics and Evolution. 145 55-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Goulson,  D.. (1999);  Foraging strategies of insects for gathering nectar and pollen, and implications for plant ecology and evolution.  Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2 185-209
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hainsworth,  F. R., and Wolf,  L. L.. (1976);  Nectar characteristics and food selection by hummingbirds.  Oecologia (Berl.). 25 101-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Heinrich,  B.. (1983) Insect foraging energetics. Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Jones, C. E. and Little, R. J., eds. New York; Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. pp. 187-214
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Heinrich,  B., and Raven,  P. H.. (1972);  Energetics and pollination ecology.  Science. 176 597-602
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Herrera,  C. M.. (1996) Floral traits and plant adaptation to insect pollinators: A devil's advocate approach. Floral biology. Studies of floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Lloyd, D. G. and Barrett, S. C. H., eds. New York; Chapman and Hall pp. 65-87
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Judd,  W. S.,, Campbell,  C. S.,, Kellog,  E. A., and Stevens,  P. F.. (1999) Plant Systematics. A phylogenetic approach. Sunderland, Massachusetts; Sinauer Associates, Inc.
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Käpilä,  M.. (1978);  Amount and type of nectar sugar in some wild flowers in Finland.  Annals Botanical Fennici. 15 85-88
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lane,  M. A.. (1996) Pollination biology of Compositae. Compositae: Biology and Utilisation. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew, 1994. Hind, D. J. N., Editor-in-Chief., Caligari, P. D. S. and Hind, D. J. N., eds. Kew; Royal Botanic Gardens pp. 61-80
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Mani,  M. S., and Saravanan,  J. M.. (1999) Pollination ecology and evolution in Compositae (Asteraceae). Enfield; Science Publishers, Inc.
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Martínez del Río,  C.,, Stevens,  B. R.,, Daneke,  D. E.,, and Andreadis,  P. T.. (1988);  Physiological correlates of preference and aversion for sugars in three species of birds.  Physiological Zoology. 61 222-229
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 McCall,  C., and Primack,  R. B.. (1992);  Influence of flower characteristics, weather, time of day, and season on insect visitation rates in three plant communities.  American Journal of Botany. 79 434-442
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Morales,  M.. (1999) Selección de caracteres florales por polinizadores, en especies del Bosque Serrano (Chaco Serrano). Undergraduate Thesis.; Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Neff,  J. L., and Simpson,  B. B.. (1990);  The roles of phenology and reward structure in the pollination biology of wild sunflower (Helianthus annus L., Asteraceae).  Israel Journal of Botany. 39 197-216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Percival,  M. S.. (1961);  Types of nectar in Angiosperms.  New Phytologist. 60 235-281
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Percival,  M.. (1965) Floral Biology. Oxford; Pergamon
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Pham-Delegue,  M. H.,, Etievant,  P.,, Guichard,  E.,, Marilleau,  R.,, Douault,  Ph.,, Chauffaille,  J.,, and Masson,  C.. (1990);  Chemicals involved in honeybee-sunflower relationship.  Journal of Chemical Ecology. 16 3053-3065
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Plowright,  C. M. S., and Plowright,  R. C.. (1997);  The advantage of short tongues in bumble bees (Bombus)-Analyses of species distributions according to flower corolla depth, and of working speeds on white clover.  The Canadian Entomologist. 129 51-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Proctor,  M., and Yeo,  P.. (1973) The pollination of flowers. London; Collins
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Silvertown,  J., and Dodd,  M.. (1997) Comparing plants and connecting traits. Plant life histories. Silvertown, J., Franco, M., and Harper, J. L., eds. Cambridge; The Royal Society, University Press pp. 3-16
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Simpson,  B. B., and Neff,  J. L.. (1983) Evolution and diversity of floral rewards. Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Jones, C. E. and Little, R. J., eds. New York; Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. pp. 142-159
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Sokal,  R. R., and Rohlf,  F. J.. (1995) Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. New York; WH Freeman and Company
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Southwick,  E. E.,, Loper,  G. M.,, and Sadwick,  S. E.. (1981);  Nectar production, composition, energetics and pollinator attractiveness in spring flowers of western New York.  American Journal of Botany. 68 994-1002
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Southwick,  E. E.. (1990);  Floral nectar.  American Bee Journal. 130 517-519
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 SPSS Inc.  . (1999) SPSS Base 10.0. Chicago; SPSS Inc.
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Stiles,  F. G.. (1976);  Taste preferences, colour preferences, and flower choice in hummingbirds.  Condor. 78 10-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Stiles,  F. G., and Freeman,  C E.. (1993);  Patterns in floral nectar characteristics of some bird-visited plant species from Costa Rica.  Biotropica. 25 191-205
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Sweeley,  E. C.,, Bentley,  R.,, Makita,  M.,, and Wells,  W. W.. (1963);  Gas liquid chromatography of trimethylsilyl derivatives of sugars and related substances.  Journal of American Chemistry Society. 85 2497-2507
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Tabachnick,  B. G., Fidell,  L. S.. (1996) Using Multivariate Statistics. 3rd ed. New York; Harper Collins College Publishers
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Thompson,  J. N.. (1999);  The raw material for coevolution.  Oikos. 84 5-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Torres,  C.. (1998);  Estructura del capítulo y caracteres florales en relación a la polinización en dos especies de Vernonia (Asteraceae).  Kurtziana. 26 65-82
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Van Handel,  E.,, Haeger,  J. S.,, and Hansel,  C. W.. (1972);  The sugars of some Florida nectars.  American Journal of Botany. 59 1030-1032
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Waser,  N. M.,, Chittka,  L.,, Price,  M. V.,, Williams,  N. M.,, and Ollerton,  J.. (1996);  Generalisation in pollination systems, and why it matters.  Ecology. 77 1043-1060
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Wykes,  G. R.. (1952);  An investigation of the sugars present in the nectar of flowers of various species.  New Phytologist. 51 511-518
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

C. Torres

Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba-CONICET)

Casilla de Correo 495
5000, Córdoba
Argentina

Email: ctorres@imbiv.unc.edu.arleo@imbiv.unc.edu.ar

Section Editor: G. Gottsberger

      >