Download PDF
Endoscopy 2002; 34(1): 2-12
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-19389
State of the Art Review

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Premedication, Preparation, and Surveillance

G.  D.  Bell1
  • 1Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, United Kingdom
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted

Accepted after Revision

Publication Date:
14 August 2002 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

The vigorous debate over whom to sedate, when to sedate, and how to sedate shows no sign of running out of steam. There is a general consensus that patients should be more involved in the decision-making process for the sedation “menu”. A move away from the take-it-or-leave-it attitude of all or nothing to an “à la carte” choice is to be encouraged. A new textbook and several further guidelines have appeared. The particular problems associated with sedating the elderly are briefly presented. The pros and cons of using local pharyngeal anaesthesia are discussed. Enthusiasm for the use of intravenous propofol is gathering momentum, despite continuing worries about its safety in the hands of the nonanaesthetist. For many endoscopists, the combination of a benzodiazepine plus (or minus) an opioid with which they are most familiar is still the best compromise in terms of efficacy, cost, and safety. Fatal drug-induced cardiopulmonary complications continue to occur, despite a general trend toward using smaller doses of sedation than we did 5 - 10 years ago. Monitoring techniques that are at present considered as research tools may one day become commonplace. These include: the use of an electroencephalography parameter known as bispectral analysis; transcutaneous CO2 measurement; and a modified continuous capnographic waveform trace to monitor ventilatory effort. Bispectral analysis may be of use in monitoring central nervous system depression and helping to distinguish between conscious sedation and deep sedation. If the measurement of CO2 levels, either transcutaneously or in breath samples, was as easy and inexpensive as measuring SpO2 with a pulse oximeter, then undoubtedly such technology would enhance the early detection of sedative-induced hypoventilation and apnoea. Further evidence regarding droperidol's possible role in conscious sedation is presented. Pain during colonoscopy remains a problem, and the possible role for intraluminal injection of peppermint oil, as well as the value of variable-stiffness colonoscopes, in reducing the need for intravenous sedation is discussed. Case reports of hyponatraemic encephalopathy and hypocalcaemic tetany as complications of oral bowel preparation are presented, as is the challenge associated with adequate bowel preparation in diabetic patients.

References

  • 1 Lazzaroni M, Bianco-Porro G. Review: premedication, preparation and surveillance.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 2-8
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Bell G D. Premedication, preparation and surveillance.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 92-100
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Lazzaroni M, Bianco-Porro G. Review: Premedication, preparation and surveillance.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 103-108
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Weiner-Kronish J P, Gropper M A. Conscious sedation. Philadelphia; Hanley and Belfus 2001
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . ASGE guidelines: modification in endoscopic practice for pediatric patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 838-842
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . ASGE guidelines: modification in endoscopic practice for the elderly.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 849-851
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Clarke G A, Jacobson B C, Hammett R J, Carr-Locke D L. The indications, utilization and safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy in an extremely elderly patient cohort.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 580-584
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Wong R CK. The menu of endoscopic sedation: all-you-can-eat, combination set, à la carte, alternative cuisine, or go hungry [editorial].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 122-126
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Bell G D, Charlton J E. Colonoscopy: is sedation necessary and is there a role for intravenous propofol?.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 264-267
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Maroy B. Level of sedation needed for colonoscopy in an individual patient, and how it should be predicted.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 465-466
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Isenberg G. Topical anesthesia: to use or not use - that is the question.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 130-133
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Boyce H W. Behavior in the endoscopy room.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 133-136
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Carr-Locke D L, Gostout C J, van Dam J. A guideline for live endoscopy courses: an ASGE white paper.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 685-688
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Soma Y, Saito H, Kishibe T. et al . Evaluation of topical pharyngeal anesthesia for upper endoscopy, including factors associated with patient tolerance.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 14-18
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 LaLuna L, Allen M L, DiMarino, Jr A J. The comparison of midazolam and topical lidocaine spray versus the combination of midazolam, meperidine and topical lidocaine spray to sedate patients for upper endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 289-293
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Gunaratnam N T, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Gostout C J, Alexander G L. Methemoglobinemia related to topical benzocaine use: is it time to reconsider the empiric use of topical anesthesia before sedated EGD?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 692-693
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and their Faculties in the United Kingdom and Ireland .Implementing and ensuring safe sedation practice for healthcare procedures in adults: report of a Working Party set up by the Royal College of Anaesthetists, chaired by Professor J. A. W. Wildsmith. London; AOMRC 2001
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Bower A L, Ripepi A, Dilger A. et al . Bispectral index monitoring of sedation during endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 192-196
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . ASGE technology status evaluation report: propofol use during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 876-879
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Elitsur Y, Blankenship P, Lawrence Z. Propofol sedation for endoscopic procedures in children.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 788-791
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Seifert H, Schnitt T H, Gultekin W F. et al . Sedation with propofol plus midazolam versus propofol alone for interventional endoscopic procedures: a prospective, randomized study.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;  14 1207-1214
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Krugliak P, Ziff B, Rusabrov Y. et al . Propofol versus midazolam for conscious sedation guided by processed EEG during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 677-682
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Vargo J J, Zuccaro G, Dumot J A. et al . Gastroenterologist-administered propofol for therapeutic upper endoscopy with graphic assessment of respiratory activity: a case series.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 250-255
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Koshy G, Nair S, Norkus E P. et al . Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 1476-1479
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Kulling D, Fantin A C, Biro P. et al . Safer colonoscopy with patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with propofol and alfentanil.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Ng J, Kong C, Nyam D. Patient-controlled sedation with propofol for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 8-13
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Gilham M J, Hutchinson R C, Carter R, Kenny G NC. Patient-maintained sedation for ERCP with a target-controlled infusion of propofol: a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 14-17
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Barawi M, Gress F. Conscious sedation: is there a need for improvement?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 365-368
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Willie R T, Barnett J L, Chey W D. et al . Routine droperidol premedication improves sedation for ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 362-366
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Farrell R J, Noonan N, Mahmud N. et al . Potential impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography workload and complication rate in patients referred because of abdominal pain.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 668-675
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Asao T, Mochiki E, Suzuki H. et al . An easy method for the intraluminal administration of peppermint oil before colonoscopy and its effectiveness in reducing colonic spasm.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 172-177
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Somerville K W, Richmond C R, Bell G D. Delayed release peppermint oil capsules (Colpermin) for the spastic colon syndrome: a pharmacokinetic study.  Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;  18 638-640
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Wehrmann T, Schmitt T, Stergiou N. et al . Topical application of nitrates onto the papilla of Vater: manometric and clinical studies.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 323-328
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Martin J P, Sexton B F, Saunders B P, Atkin W S. Inhaled patient-administered nitrous oxide mixture does not impair driving ability when used as analgesia during screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 701-703
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Shah S G, Saunders B P, Brooker J C, Williams C B. Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Waye J D. Imaging of the colonoscope: magnetic, fluoroscopic, or neither?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 131-133
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Brooker J C, Saunders B P, Shan S G, Williams C B. A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial.  Gut. 2000;  46 801-805
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Sorbi D, Schleck C D, Zinsmeister A R, Gostout C J. Clinical application of a new colonoscope with variable insertion tube rigidity: a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 638-642
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Rex D K. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 60-64
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Odori T, Goto H, Arisawa T. et al . Clinical results and development of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 65-69
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Ladas S D. Factors predicting the possibility of conducting colonoscopy without sedation.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 688-692
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Kim W H, Cho Y J, Park J Y. et al . Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 600-605
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff G S, Sauar J, Vatn M H. Patient tolerance of colonoscopy without sedation during screening examination for colorectal polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 606-610
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Yacavone R F, Locke G R, Gostout C J. et al . Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 703-710
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Nelson D B, Freeman M L, Silvis S E. et al . A randomised controlled trial of transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring during ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 288-295
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Ristikankare M, Julkunen R, Laitinen T. et al . Effect of conscious sedation on cardiac autonomic regulation during colonoscopy.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;  35 990-996
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Petelenz M, Musialik J, Besser P. et al . Cardiac sympathovagal balance during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 683-687
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Shaoul R, Wolff R, Seligmann H. et al . Symptoms of hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcaemia, and hypomagnesemia in an adolescent after oral administration of sodium phosphate in preparation for a colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 650-652
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Schroppel B, Segerer S, Keuneke C. et al . Hyponatraemic encephalopathy after preparation for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 527-529
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Taylor C, Schubert M L. Decreased efficacy of polyethylene glycol lavage solution (GoLytely) in the preparation of diabetic patients for outpatient colonoscopy: a prospective and blinded study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 710-714
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

G. D. Bell

Faculty of Medical Sciences · University of Sunderland

The Grange · Chilton Moor · Durham DH4 6QB · United Kingdom

Email: duncan_bell@compuserve.com