Endoscopic vs. Conventional Vein Harvesting:
First Results with a New, Non-Disposable System

Background: Most of the grafts used in coronary bypass surgery are still venous grafts. The preferred vein for bypass surgery is the long saphenous vein. Severe wound complications caused by saphenous vein harvesting occur in 1 % to 3 % of cases. Minor complications that do not need surgical revision occur in up to 43 % of cases. We developed an endoscopic harvesting technique using non-disposable instruments to reduce wound complications caused by vein harvesting. Method: In a retrospective study, the occurrence of wound complications, haematoma, postoperative pain, ambulation, sensory disturbances and patient satisfaction were studied (n = 182). Patients who had either endoscopically harvested (n = 91) or conventionally harvested (n = 91) saphenous vein grafts were reviewed. Results: Results were collected for 173 patients. The overall prevalence of wound complications was 18.7 %. The incidence of wound healing complications could be reduced significantly (p = 0.015) from 15.3 % to 3.4 % using the endoscopic technique. In the endoscopic group, postoperative ambulation was significantly (p = 0.002) easier, patient satisfaction was significantly (p = 0.007) higher, and postoperative leg swelling (p = 0.003) and haematoma (p = 0.004) could be reduced significantly. The occurrence of postoperative pain and sensory disturbances did not differ significantly. Comment: We conclude that the used endoscopic vein harvesting is a safe and cost effective method that can significantly reduce wound complications. An ongoing prospective study should establish our demonstrated data.

Key words:

Saphenectomy - Minimal invasive - Endoscopic - Video-assisted - Wound complications

References

• 1 Lamphere J A, Daily P O, Moreno R J, Marcus S, Dembitsky W P, Adamson R M, Burr M, O’Neil P. New technique for lesser saphenous vein harvesting.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;  60 1829-1830
• 2 Wipke-Tevis D D, Stotts N A, Skov P, Carriereri-Kohlman V. Frequency, manifestations, and correlates of impaired healing of saphenous vein harvest incisions.  Heart Lung. 1996;  25 108-116
• 3 Carpino P A, Khabbaz K R, Bojar R M, Rastegar H, Warner K G, Murphy R E, Payne D D. Clinical benefits of endoscopic vein harvesting in patients with risk factors for saphenectomy wound infections undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;  119 69-76
• 4 Allen K B, Shaar C J. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;  64 265-266
• 5 Cable D G, Dearani J A. Endoscopic vein harvesting: minimally invasive video-assisted saphenectomy.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;  64 1183-1185
• 6 Meldrum-Hanna W, Ross D, Johnson D, Deal C. Long saphenous vein harvesting. Aust. N. Z.  J Surg. 1986;  56 923-924
• 7 Lumpsen A B, Eaves F F. Focus on technique: Subcutaneous, video-assisted saphenous vein harvest. Vasc.  surg.. 1994;  7 43-55
• 8 Lutz C W, Schlensak C, Lutter G, Schöllhorn J, Beyersdorf F. Minimal-invasive, video-assisted vein harvesting for cardiac and vascular surgical procedures.  Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg. 1997;  12 519-521
• 9 Dimitri W R, West C H, West I E, Williams B T. A quick and atraumatic method of autologous vein harvesting using the subcutaneous extraluminal dissector.  J Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;  28 103-111
• 10 Regan D J, Borland J A, Chester A H, Pennel D J, Yacoub M, Pepper J R. Assessment of human long saphenous vein function with minimal invasive harvesting with the Mayo-Stripper.  Eur J Card-thorac Surg. 1997;  12 428-435
• 11 Slaughter M S, Olson M M, Lee J T, Ward H B. A fifteen year wound surveillance study after coronary artery bypass.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;  56 1063-1068
• 12 Jordan W D, Voellinger D C, Schroeder P T, McDowell H A. Video-assisted saphenous vein harvest: the evolution of a new technique.  J Vasc Surg. 1997;  26 405-414
• 13 Davis Z, Jacobs H K, Zhang M, Thomas C, Castellanos Y. Endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: technique and outcomes.  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;  116 228-234
• 14 Allen K B, Griffith G L, Heimansohn D A. Endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting: a prospective. randomized trial.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  66 26-32
• 15 Pagni S, Ulfe E A, Montgomery W D. Clinical experience with the video-assisted saphenectomy procedure for coronary bypass operations.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  66 1626-1631
• 16 Morris R J, Butler M T, Samuels L E. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  66 1026-1028
• 17 Crouch J D, O’Hair D P, Keuler J P, Barragry T P, Werner P H, Kleinmann L H. Open versus endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: Wound complications and vein quality.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  68 1513-1516