Seminars in Neurosurgery 2001; 12(1): 065-080
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-13000
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Synthetic Nerve Conduits: Indications and Technique

Robert A. Weber1 , A. Lee Dellon2
  • 1Division of Plastic Surgery, Scott & White Clinic and Memorial Hospital, Scott, Sherwood and Brindley Foundation, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, TX
  • 2Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2001 (online)

ABSTRACT

Synthetic nerve conduits are an important advance in the reconstruction of peripheral nerves. Based on decades of basic science developments showing the potential role of neurotrophic factors in axonal regeneration, conduits create a controlled environment that allows neurites to grow across gaps in an ordered fashion, thereby offering improved function compared to end-to-end repair and significantly less donor site morbidity than nerve grafts. Although vein graft tubes have been used in humans, recently available polyglycolic acid (PGA) conduits are mechanically superior and obviate the need for harvesting autogenous vein. Silicone and Gore-Tex tubes can be used in those cases where a PGA conduit is not available, but they require a second operation for removal. Placement of a conduit is straightforward. The nerve ends are trimmed, a U-stitch is used to draw the nerve ends into the tube, and the remaining space is filled with heparinized saline. Future advances will allow longer gaps to be spanned in a shorter period of time with even better functional results.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Bungner O V. Die degenerations-und regeneration-vorgänge am nerven verletzungen.  Beitr Pathol Anal . 1891;  10 321-393
  • 2 Weber R A, Warner M R, Verheyden C N, Proctor W H. Functional evaluation of gap versus abutment repair of peripheral nerves in the rat.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 1996;  12(3) 159-163
  • 3 Lundborg G, Dahlin L B, Danielson N, Nachemson A K. Tissue specificity in nerve regeneration.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg . 1986;  20(3) 279-283
  • 4 Mackinnon S E, Dellon A L, Lundborg G. A study of neurotrophism in the primate model.  J Hand Surg [Am] . 1986;  11(6) 888-894
  • 5 Seckel B R, Ryan S E, Gagne R J. Target-specific nerve regeneration through a nerve guide in the rat.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1986;  78(6) 793-800
  • 6 Brushart T M, Seiler W A. Selective reinnervation of distal motor stumps by peripheral motor axons.  Exp Neurol . 1987;  97(2) 289-300
  • 7 Williams L R, Longo F M, Powell H C. Spatial-temporal progress of peripheral nerve regeneration within a silicone chamber: parameters for a bioassay.  J Comp Neurol . 1983;  218(4) 460-470
  • 8 Chiu D T, Janecka I, Krizek T J. Autogenous vein graft as a conduit for nerve regeneration.  Surgery . 1982;  91(2) 226-233
  • 9 Lundborg G, Gelberman R H, Longo R M. In vivo regeneration of cut nerves encased in silicone tubes: growth across a six-millimeter gap.  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol . 1982;  41(4) 412-422
  • 10 Molander H, Olsson Y, Engkvist O. Regeneration of peripheral nerve through a polyglactin tube.  Muscle Nerve . 1982;  5(1) 54-57
  • 11 Colin W, Donoff R B. Nerve regeneration through collagen tubes.  J Dent Res . 1984;  63(7) 987-993
  • 12 Lundborg G, Rosen B, Dahlin L. Tubular versus conventional repair of median and ulnar nerves in the human forearm: early results from a prospective, randomized, clinical study.  J Hand Surg [Am] . 1997;  22(1) 99-106
  • 13 Stanec S, Stanec Z. Reconstruction of upper-extremity peripheral-nerve injuries wit ePTFE conduits.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 1998;  14(4) 227-232
  • 14 Chiu D T. Autongenous venous nerve conduits. A review.  Hand Clin . 1999;  15(4) 667-671
  • 15 Braga-Silva J. The use of silicone tubing in the late repair of the median and ulnar nerves in the forearm.  J Hand Surg [Br] . 1999;  24(6) 703-706
  • 16 Snyder C C. The History of Nerve Repair. In: Omer GE, Spinner M, eds. Management of Nerve Problems, 1st ed Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders 1980: 354-355
  • 17 Terzis J, Faibisoff B, Williams B. The nerve gap: suture under tension versus graft.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1975;  56(2) 166-170
  • 18 Wang W Z, Crain G M, Baylis W, Tsai T M. Outcome of digital nerve injuries in adults.  J Hand Surg [Am] . 1996;  21(1) 138-143
  • 19 Millesi H. Reappraisal of nerve repair.  Surg Clin North Am . 1981;  61(2) 321-340
  • 20 Staniforth P, Fisher T R. The effects of sural nerve excision in autogenous nerve grafting.  Hand . 1978;  10(2) 187-190
  • 21 Ortiguela M E, Wood M B, Cahill D R. Anatomy of the sural nerve complex.  J Hand Surg [Am] . 1987;  12(6) 1119-1123
  • 22 Rappaport W D, Valente J, Hunter G C. Clinical utilization and complications of sural nerve biopsy.  Am J Surg . 1993;  166(3) 252-256
  • 23 Dyck P J, Lofgren E P. Nerve biopsy. Choice of nerve, method, symptoms, and usefulness.  Medical Clin North Am . 1968;  52(4) 885-893
  • 24 Poburski R, Malin J P, Stark E. Sequelae of sural nerve biopsies.  Clin Neurol Neurosurg . 1985;  87(3) 193-198
  • 25 Perry J R, Bril V. Complications of sural nerve biopsy in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients.  Can J Neurol Sci . 1994;  21(1) 34-37
  • 26 Gould J SP. Digital Nerves. In: Gelberman RH, ed. Operative Nerve Repair and Reconstruction Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott 1991: 458
  • 27 Mackinnon S E, Dellon A L. Surgery of the Peripheral Nerve.  New York: Thieme 1988: 121
  • 28 de Medinaceli L, Seaber A V. Experimental nerve reconnection: importance of initial repair.  Microsurgery . 1989;  10(1) 56-70
  • 29 Koerber H R, Seymour A W, Mendell L M. Mismatches between peripheral receptor type and central projections after peripheral nerve regeneration.  Neurosci Lett . 1989;  99(1-2) 67-72
  • 30 Chiu D TW. Autogenous and Synthetic Conduits for Nerve Repair. In: Omer GE, Spinner M, Van Beek AL, eds. Management of Peripheral Nerve Problems, 2nd ed Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders 1998: 305-306
  • 31 Doolabh V B, Hertl M C, Mackinnon S E. The role of conduits in nerve repair: a review.  Rev Neurosci . 1996;  7(1) 47-84
  • 32 Strauch B. Use of nerve conduits in peripheral nerve repair.  Hand Clin . 2000;  16(1) 123-130
  • 33 Chiu D T, Strauch B. A prospective clinical evaluation of autogenous vein grafts used as a nerve conduit for distal sensory nerve defects of 3 cm or less.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1990;  86(5) 928-934
  • 34 Walton R L, Brown R E, Matory Jr E W. Autogenous vein graft repair of digital nerve defects in the finger: a retrospective clinical study.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1989;  84(6) 944-949
  • 35 Nahabedian M Y, Smolev J K. Successful reinnervation of the penis using an autogenous vein conduit.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 1998;  14(1) 31-33
  • 36 Miloro M. Inferior alveolar nerve regeneration through an autogenous vein graft.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1996;  (suppl 3)54 65
  • 37 Tang J B, Gu Y Q, Song Y S. Repair of digital nerve defect with autogenous vein graft during flexor tendon surgery in zone 2.  J Hand Surg [Br] . 1993;  18(4) 449-453
  • 38 Benito-Ruiz J, Navarro-Monzonis A, Piqueras A, Baena-Montilla P. Invaginated vein graft as nerve conduit: an experimental study.  Microsurgery . 1994;  15(2) 105-115
  • 39 Hermann J B, Kelly R J, Higgins G A. Polyglycolic acid sutures. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a new absorbable suture material.  Arch Surg . 1970;  100(4) 486-490
  • 40 Marmon L M, Vinocur C D, Standiford S B. Evaluation of absorbable polyglycolic acid mesh as a wound support.  J Pediatr Surg . 1985;  20(6) 737-742
  • 41 Ginde R M, Gupta R K. In vitro chemical degradation of polyglycolic acid pellets and fibers.  J Appl Polymer Sci . 1987;  33 2411-2429
  • 42 Barrows T H. Degradable implant materials: a review of synthetic absorbable polymers and their applications.  Clinical Materials . 1986;  1(4) 233-257
  • 43 Mackinnon S E, Dellon A L. Clinical nerve reconstruction with a bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid tube.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1990;  85(3) 419-424
  • 44 Crawley W A, Dellon A L. Inferior alveolar nerve reconstruction with a polyglycolic acid bioabsorbable nerve conduit.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1992;  90(2) 300-302
  • 45 Weber R A, Breidenbach W C, Brown R E. A randomized prospective study of polyglycolic acid conduits for digital nerve reconstruction in humans.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2000;  106(5) 1036-1045
  • 46 Berger A, Mailander P, Schneider W, Becker M. Sensory recovery by different techniques. Presented at the Third International Hand Surgery Symposium, Tokyo, Japan, April, 1988
  • 47 Wang W Z, Crain G M, Baylis W, Tsai T M. Outcome of digital nerve injuries in adults.  J Hand Surg [Am] . 1996;  21(1) 138-143
  • 48 Poppen N K, McCarroll Jr R H, Doyle J R, Neibauer J J. Recovery of sensibility after suture of digital nerves.  J Hand Surg [Am] . 1979;  4(3) 212-225
  • 49 Efstathopoulos D, Gerostathopoulos N, Misitzis D. Clinical assessment of primary digital nerve repair.  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl . 1995;  264 45-47
  • 50 Al-Ghazal S K, McKiernan M, Khan K, McCann J. Results of clinical assessment after primary digital nerve repair.  J Hand Surg [Br] . 1994;  19(2) 255-257
  • 51 Posch J L, delaCruz-Saddul F. Nerve repair in trauma surgery. A 10 year study of 231 peripheral injuries.  Orthop Rev . 1980;  9 35-45
  • 52 Beazley W C, Milek M A, Reiss B H. Results of nerve grafting in severe soft tissue injuries.  Clin Orthop . 1984;  (188) 208-212
  • 53 McFarlane R M, Mayer J R. Digital nerve grafts with the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve.  J Hand Surg [Am] . 1976;  1(3) 169-173
  • 54 Lundborg G, Dahlin L B, Danielsen N. Ulnar nerve repair by the silicone chamber technique. Case report.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg . 1991;  25(1) 79-82
  • 55 Lundborg G, Rosen B, Abrahamson S O. Tubular repair of the median nerve in the human forearm. Preliminary findings.  J Hand Surg [Br] . 1994;  19(3) 273-276
  • 56 Weber R A. Conduit Repair of Peripheral Nerves. Hand Surgery Update, Texas Society of Plastic Surgeons, Austin, TX, 1999
  • 57 Mackinnon S E, Dellon A L, Hudson A R, Hunter D A. Chronic nerve compression: an experimental model in the rat.  Ann Plast Surg . 1984;  13(2) 112-120
  • 58 Mackinnon S E, Dellon A L, Hudson A R, Hunter D A. A primate model for chronic nerve compression.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 1985;  1(3) 185-195
  • 59 Mackinnon S E, Dellon A L. Experimental study of chronic nerve compression. Clinical implications.  Hand Clin . 1986;  2(4) 639-650
  • 60 Dellon A L. Use of a silicone tube for the reconstruction of a nerve injury.  J Hand Surg [Br] . 1994;  19(3) 271-272
  • 61 Dellon A L. Resection: nerve repair's most neglected technique.  Plast Surg Techniques . 1995;  1(3) 191-199
  • 62 Dellon A L. Evaluation of Sensibility and Re-Education of Sensation in the Hand.  Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1981
  • 63 Hudson T W, Evans G R, Schmidt C E. Engineering strategies for peripheral nerve repair.  Clin Plast Surg . 1999;  26(4) 617-628
  • 64 Tang J. Vein conduits with interposition of nerve tissue for peripheral nerve defects.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 1995;  11(1) 21-26
  • 65 Francel P C, Francel T J, Mackinnon S E, Hertl C. Enhancing nerve regeneration across a silicone tube conduit by using interposed short-segment nerve grafts.  J Neurosurg . 1997;  87(6) 887-892
    >