Synergistic Sedation with Low-Dose Midazolam and Propofol for Colonoscopies

Background and Study Aims: Patients undergoing colonoscopy are often sedated with benzodiazepines and long-acting opiates. Since low-dose midazolam also acts synergistically with short-acting propofol, we compared this synergistic sedation with a standard combination of midazolam and the opioid nalbuphine for colonoscopies.

Patients and Methods: A total of 79 patients presenting for colonoscopies were randomly assigned to the following protocols. Patients in group I (n = 32) received a median dose of 9 mg midazolam (interquartile range [IQR] 6 to 12); 20 patients (59 %) needed additional nalbuphine (median 20 mg, IQR 10 to 20). Patients in group II (n = 47) received 2 mg midazolam and repeated injections of propofol (median 100 mg, IQR 53 to 145) with a maximal bolus of 50 mg.

Results: Patients treated with the synergistic sedation (group II) recovered remarkably sooner after the procedure compared with those in group I, with a median time to discharge of 17 minutes vs. 93 minutes (P < 0.001). Of the patients treated with analgosedation (group I), 28 % were unable to take part in a reaction time measurement and attention awareness test 1 hour after the procedure. All patients treated with the synergistic sedation were able to participate (P = 0.002), and performed better. Despite a lower proportion of complete amnesia, patients treated with synergistic sedation more often rated the procedure as comfortable (81 % vs. 50 %). Quality of sedation from the point of view of the endoscopist, and cardiorespiratory parameters, were similar in both groups.

Conclusions: Low-dose midazolam combined with propofol is an effective and economic alternative to benzodiazepine-based analgosedation. It is associated with a high degree of patient comfort and rapid recovery times, and has a potential cost benefit concerning nursing care and bed facilities.

References

• 1 Froehlich F, Schwizer W, Thorens J, et al. Conscious sedation for gastroscopy: patient tolerance and cardiorespiratory parameters.  Gastroenterology. 1995;  108 697-704
• 2 Nagaya M, Kachi T, Yamada T, Igata A. Videofluorographic study of swallowing in Parkinson's disease.  Dysphagia. 1998;  13 95-100
• 3 Reves J G, Fragen R J, Vinik H R, Greenblatt D J. Midazolam: pharmacology and uses.  Anesthesiology. 1985;  62 310-324
• 4 Boldy D A, English J S, Lang G S, Hoare A M. Sedation for endoscopy: a comparison between diazepam, and diazepam plus pethidine with naloxone reversal.  Br J Anaesth. 1984;  56 1109-1112
• 5 Diab F H, King P D, Barthel J S, Marshall J B. Efficacy and safety of combined meperidine and midazolam for EGD sedation compared with midazolam alone.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 1120-1125
• 6 Gamble J A, Kawar P, Dundee J W, et al. Evaluation of midazolam as an intravenous induction agent.  Anaesthesia. 1981;  36 868-873
• 7 Lo M W, Lee F H, Schary W L, Whitney C C . The pharmacokinetics of intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous nalbuphine in healthy subjects.  Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1987;  33 297-301
• 8 Patterson K W, Casey P B, Murray J P, et al. Propofol sedation for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison with midazolam.  Br J Anaesth. 1991;  67 108-111
• 9 Bailey P L, Pace N L, Ashburn M A, et al. Frequent hypoxemia and apnea after sedation with midazolam and fentanyl.  Anesthesiology. 1990;  73 826-830
• 10 Rogers K M, Dewar K M, McCubbin T D, Spence A A. Preliminary experience with ICI 35 868 as an i.v. induction agent: comparison with althesin.  Br J Anaesth. 1980;  52 807-810
• 11 Adam H K, Briggs L P, Bahar M, et al. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of ICI 35 868 in man. Single induction doses with different rates of injection.  Br J Anaesth. 1983;  55 97-103
• 12 Carrasco G, Molina R, Costa J, et al. Propofol vs. midazolam in short-, medium-, and long-term sedation of critically ill patients. A cost-benefit analysis.  Chest. 1993;  103 557-564
• 13 Carlsson U, Grattidge P. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of propofol and midazolam.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 240-243
• 14 Chin N M, Tai H Y, Chin M K. Intravenous sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: midazolam versus propofol.  Singapore Med J. 1992;  33 478-480
• 15 Gepts E, Claeys M A, Camu F, Smekens L. Infusion of propofol (“Diprivan”) as sedative technique for colonoscopies.  Postgrad Med J. 1985;  61 (Suppl. 3) 120-126
• 16 Short T G, Chui P T. Propofol and midazolam act synergistically in combination.  Br J Anaesth. 1991;  67 539-545
• 17 Carrasco G, Cabre L, Sobrepere G, et al. Synergistic sedation with propofol and midazolam in intensive care patients after coronary artery bypass grafting.  Crit Care Med. 1998;  26 844-851
• 18 Meyer F P, Walther H, Uchtlander M. Zum Einfluß von Pharmaka auf die menschliche Diskriminationsfähigkeit.  Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol Leipz. 1984;  36 464-471
• 19 Cockshott I D, Briggs L P, Douglas E J, White M. Pharmacokinetics of propofol in female patients. Studies using single bolus injections.  Br J Anaesth. 1987;  59 1103-1110
• 20 Hug C CJ, McLeskey C H, Nahrwold M L, et al. Hemodynamic effects of propofol: data from over 25 000 patients.  Anesth Analg. 1993;  77 29
• 21 Raymond J M, Capdenat E, Beyssac R, et al. Qualité de la récupération psychomotrice après une coloscopie sous anesthésie générale par propofol. Intérêt des tests de réveil.  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1995;  19 373-377
• 22 Short T G, Plummer J L, Chui P T. Hypnotic and anaesthetic interactions between midazolam, propofol and alfentanil.  Br J Anaesth. 1992;  69 162-167
• 23 Lai H C, Hung C J, Tsai Y S, et al. Co-administration of midazolam decreases propofol dose during anesthesia in endoscopic laryngeal microsurgery.  Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 1996;  34 191-196
• 24 Barker P, Langton J A, Murphy P, Rowbotham D J. Effect of prior administration of cold saline on pain during propofol injection. A comparison with cold propofol and propofol with lignocaine.  Anaesthesia. 1991;  46 1069-1070
• 25 Rembacken B J, Axon A TR. The role of pethidine in sedation for colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 244-247
• 26 Brickenkamp R. Test d2 Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test.  Göttingen; Hogrefe Publishing, 1994 8th edition
• 27 Berggren L, Eriksson I, Mollenholt P, Wickbom G. Sedation for fibreoptic gastroscopy: a comparative study of midazolam and diazepam.  Br J Anaesth. 1983;  55 289-296