Download PDF
Seminars in Neurosurgery 2000; 11(2): 193-206
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-13226
Copyright © 2000 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS: TREATMENT STRATEGIES

Richard Stovall, Andrea Halliday
  • Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; and Center for Neurological Disorders, P.A., Ft. Worth, Texas
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is a heterogenous entity requiring a number of different treatment strategies. Only 10-15% of patients with a symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis will require surgical intervention. The traditional surgical treatment has been decompression of the associated stenosis with a laminectomy and medial facetectomies. However, several studies have shown improved outcome with the addition of an intertransverse fusion. Although outcome is improved with fusion, a significant improvement in patient outcome has not been demonstrated with instrumented fusions. Thus, instrumented fusion should be reserved for patients at high risk for a progressive deformity such as patients with excessive motion on preoperative radiographs, a documented progressive slip, and those requiring a discectomy or total facetectomy to adequately decompress the neural elements. The standard type of fusion has been a posterolateral intertransverse fusion with autologous bone. An interbody fusion may be advantageous when there is severe disc space collapse with narrowing of the neuroforamen, when a discectomy is performed as part of the decompression, or to correct a kyphosis at that motion segment. Randomized, controlled outcome studies evaluating the use of instrumented fusions in subsets of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis are needed.

KEYWORD

Lumbar spondylolisthesis - lumbar stenosis - lumbar spine surgery

REFERENCES

  • 1 Bennett G J. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. In: Youman JR (ed) Neurological Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1996: 2416-2431
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Neugebauer F L. The classic: a new contribution to the history and etiology of spondylolisthesis.  Clin Orthop . 1976;  117 4-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Junghanns H. Spondylolisthesis ohne spalt in zwischengelenstuck.  Archiv fur Orthopaedische and Unfall-Chirurgie . 1930;  29 118-127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 McNab I. Spondylolisthesis with an intact neural arch: the so-called pseudo-spondylolisthesis.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1950;  32B 325-334
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Potter R M, Norcross J R. Panel discussion on low back pain spondylolisthesis without isthmus defect.  Radiology . 1954;  63 678-686
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Newman P H. Spondylolisthesis: its cause and effects. Humterian Lecture.  Ann R Coll Surg . 1955;  16 305-312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wiltse L L, Newman P H, McNab I. Classification of spondylolisis and spondylolisthesis.  Clin Orthip . 1976;  117 23-29
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rosenberg N J. Degenerative spondylolisthesis.  Predisposing factors. J Bone Joint Surg . 1975;  57A 467-474
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Herkowitz H N. Spine update. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.  Spine . 1995;  20 1084-1090
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Brown M D, Lockwood J M. Degenerative spondylolisthesis. In: Blount WP, Banks SW (eds). American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery Instructional Course Lectures St. Louis: CV Mosby 1983: 162-169
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Yang K, King A. Mechanism of facet load transmission as a hypotheses for low back pain.  Spine . 1984;  9 557-565
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Grobler L J, Robertson P A, Novotny J E. Etiology of spondylolisthesis. Assessment of the role played by lumbar facet joint morphology.  Spine . 1993;  18 80-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Boden S D, Riew K D, Yamaguchi K. Orientation of lumbar facet joints: association with degenerative disc disease.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1996;  78A 403-411
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cinotti G, Postacchini F, Fassari F. Predisposing factors in degenerative spondylolisthesis. A radiographic study.  Int Orthop . 1997;  21 337-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Berlemann U, Jeszenszky D J, Bubler D W. Facet joint remodeling in degenerative spondylolisthesis: an investigation of joint orientation and tropism.  Eur Spine J . 1998;  7 376-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Berlemann U, Jeszenszky D J, Buhler D W. The role of lumbar lordosis, vertebral end plate inclination, disc height, and facet orientation in degenerative spondylolisthesis.  J Spinal Disord . 1999;  12 68-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Fukuymama S, Nakamura T, Ikeda T. The effect of mechanical stress on hypertrophy of the lumbar ligamentum flavum.  J Spinal Disord . 1995;  8 126-130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Postacchini F. Spine update. Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.  Spine . 1999;  24 1043-1047
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sanderson P L, Fraser R D. The influence of pregnancy on the development of degenerative spondylolisthesis.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1996;  78B 951-954
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Baldwin N G, Ehni B L. Spondylolisthesis. Sagittal plane lumbar spine deformity correction. In: Benzel EC (ed). Spine Surgery. Techniques, Complication Avoidance, and Management Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone 1999: 435-452
    Google Scholar
  • 21 McGregor A H, McCarthy I D, Dore C J. Quantitative assessment of the motion of the lumbar spine in the low back pain population and the effect of different spinal pathologies on this motion.  Eur Spine J . 1997;  6 308-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Laurent L E, Osterman K. Operative treatment of spondylolisthesis in young patients.  Clin Orthop . 1976;  117 85-91
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Meyerding H W. Spondylolisthesis.  Surg Gynecol Obstet . 1932;  54 371-377
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Matsunugas, Sakou T, Morizono Y. Natural history of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Pathogenesis and natural course of the slippage.  Spine . 1990;  15 1204-1210
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Friberg O. Lumbar instability: a dynamic approach by traction-compression radiography.  Spine . 1987;  12 119-129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Stokes I A, Wilder D G, Frymoyer J W. Assessment of patients with low bank pain by biplanar radiographic measurement of intervertebral motion.  Spine . 1981;  6 233-240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Olerud S, Sjostrom L, Karlstrom G. Spontaneous effect of increased stability of the lower lumbar spine in cases of severe chronic back pain. The answer of an external transpeduncular fixation test.  Clin Orthop . 1986;  203 67-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Esses S I, Botsford D J, Kostuik J P. The role of external spinal skeletal fixation in the assessment of low back disorders.  Spine . 1989;  14 594-601
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Thomsen K, Christensen F B, Eiskjaer S P. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study.  Spine . 1997;  22 2813-2822
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Posner I, White A A, Edwards W T. A biomechanical analysis of the clinical stability of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine.  Spine . 1982;  374-389
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sonntag V K, Marciano F F. Is fusion indicated for lumbar spinal disorders?.  Spine . 1995;  20 138S-142S
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hanley E N. The indications for lumbar spinal fusion with and without instrumentation.  Spine . 1995;  20 143S-153S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sidhu K S, Herkowitz H N. Spinal instrumentation in the management of degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.  Clin Orthop . 1997;  335 39-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hanley E, Spangler D, Wiesel S. Controversies in low back pain. The surgical approach. In: Schafer M (ed). AAOS Instructional Course lectures, vol 43 Park Ridge, IL: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons 1994: 415-423
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Sinaki M, Lutness M P, Ilstrup D M. Lumbar spondylolisthesis: retrospective comparison and three-year follow-up two conservative treatment programs.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 1989;  70 594-598
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Magord A. Conservative treatment in spondylolisthesis.  Clin Orthop . 1976;  117 74-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Plotz G MJ, Benini A. Surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis in the lumbar spine: no reposition without prior decompression.  Acta Neurochir . 1995;  137 188-191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Rosenberg N J. Degenerative spondylolisthesis.  Surgical treatment. Clin Orthop . 1976;  117 112-120
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Fitzgerald J AN, Newman P H. Degenerative spondylolisthesis.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1976;  58B 184-192
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Epstein N E, Epstein J A, Carras R. Degenerative spondylolisthesis with intact neural arch. Review of 60 cases with analysis of clinical findings and development of surgical management.  Neurosurg . 1983;  13 555-561
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Feffer H L, Wiesel S W, Cuckler J M. Degenerative spondylolisthesis. To fuse or not to fuse.  Spine . 1985;  1 287-289
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Johnsson K, Wilner S. Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.  Spine . 1986;  11 107-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Postacchini F, Cinott G. Bone regrowth after surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1992;  74 862-869
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Fox M W, Onofrio B M, Hanssen A D. Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone.  J Neurosurg . 1996;  85 793-802
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Alexander E, Kelly D L, Davis C H. Intact arch spondylolisthesis. A review of 50 cases and description of surgical treatment.  J Neurosurg . 1985;  63 840-844
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Sanderson P L, Wood P L. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in old people.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1993;  75B 393-397
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Herron L D, Trippi A C. L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. The results of treatment by decompressive laminectomy without fusion.  Spine . 1989;  5 534-538
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Lombardi J S, Wiltse L L, Reynolds J. Treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis.  Spine . 1985;  10 821-827
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Postacchini F, Cinotti G, Perugia D. The surgical treatment of central lumbar stenosis. Multiple laminotomy compared with total laminectomy.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1993;  75 386-392
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Tsai R Y, Yang R S, Bray R S. Microscopic laminotomies for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.  J Spinal Disord . 1998;  11 389-394
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Matsui H, Kanamori M, Ishihara H. Expansive lumbar laminoplasty for degenerative spinal stenosis in patients below 70 years of age.  Eur Spine J . 1997;  6 191-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Newman P H. Surgical treatment for spondylolisthesis in the adult.  Clin Orthop . 1976;  117 106-111
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 McCulloch J A. Microdecompression and uninstrumented single-level fusion for spinal canal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.  Spine . 1998;  23 2243-2252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Herkowitz H N, Kurz L T. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. Prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1991;  73 802-808
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 King D. Internal fixation for lumbosacral spine fusions.  Am J Surg . 1994;  66 357-361
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Harrington P R. Treatment of scoliosis, correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1962;  44A 591-610
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Zdeblick T A. A prospective randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary results.  Spine . 1993;  18 983-991
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Bridwell K, Sedgewick T, O'Brien M J. The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.  Spinal Disord . 1993;  6 461-472
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Mardjetko S M, Connolly P J, Shott S. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a meta-analysis of literature 1970-1993.  Spine . 1994;  20(suppl) S2256-S2265
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Rechtine G R, Sutterlin C E, Wood G W. The efficacy of pedicle screw/plate fixation on lumbar/lumbosacral autogeneous bone graft fusion in adult patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.  J Spinal Disord . 1996;  9 382-391
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Booth K C, Bridwell K H, Eisenberg B A. Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented fusion.  Spine . 1999;  24 1721-1727
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Stambough J L. Lumbosacral instrumented fusion: analysis of 124 consecutive cases.  J Spinal Disord . 1999;  12 1-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Steffee A D, Brantisan J W. The variable screw placement spinal fixation system. Report of prospective study of 250 patients enrolled in FDA clinical trials.  Spine . 1993;  18 1160-1172
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Schnee C L, Greese A, Ansell L V. Outcome analysis for adults with spondylolisthesis treated with posterolateral fusion and transpedicular screw fixation.  J Neurosurg . 1997;  86 56-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Katz J N, Lipson S J, Lew R A. Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes.  Spine . 1997;  22 1123-1131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Fischgrund J S, Mackay M, Herkowitz H N. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation.  Spine . 1997;  22 2807-2812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Etebar S, Cahill D W. Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability.  J Neurosurg (Spine 2) . 1999;  90 162-169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabayashi S. Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders.  J Spinal Disord . 1995;  8 464-473
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Yaun H A, Garfin S R, Dickman C A. A historical cohort study of pedicle screw fixation in thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spinal fusions.  Spine . 1994;  20(suppl) S2279-S2296
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Nakai S, Yoshizawa H, Kobayashi S. Long-term follow-up study of posterior lumbar interbody fusion.  J Spinal Disord . 1999;  12 293-299
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Goh J, Wong H, Thambyah A, Yu C. Influence of PLIF cage size on lumbar spine stability.  Spine . 2000;  25 35-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Inoue S, Watanebe T, Goto S. Degenerative spondylolisthesis. Pathophysiology and results of anterior interbody fusion.  Clin Orthop . 1988;  227 90-98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Whitecloud T S. Point of view.  Spine . 1996;  21 1925-1926
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Heary R F, Benzel E C, Vaicys C. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion. In: Benzel EC (ed). Spine Surgery: Techniques, Complication Avoidance, and Management Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone 1999: 333-358
    Google Scholar
  • 75 Gertzbein S D, Betz R, Clements D. Semirigid instrumentation in the management of lumbar spinal conditions combined with circumferential fusion.  Spine . 1996;  21 1918-1926
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Lee T-C. Reduction and stabilization without laminectomy for unstable degenerative spondylolisthesis: a preliminary report.  Neurosurgery . 1994;  35 1076
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Plotz G MJ, Benini A. Surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis in the lumbar spine: No reposition without prior decompression.  Acta Neurochir . 1995;  137 188-1911
    PubMedGoogle Scholar