Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1782599
Design and Implementation of a Didactic Curriculum in a Large Neonatal–Perinatal Medicine Fellowship Program: A Single-Center Experience
Abstract
Objective Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) provide regulations and guidance on fellowship didactic education, each program establishes their own didactic schedules to address these learning needs. Wide variation exists in content, educators, amount of protected educational time, and the format for didactic lectures. This inconsistency can contribute to fellow dissatisfaction, a perceived poor learning experience, and poor attendance. Our objective was to create a Neonatal–Perinatal Medicine (NPM) fellow curriculum based on adult learning theory utilizing fellow input to improve the perceived fellow experience.
Study Design A needs assessment of current NPM fellows at Cincinnati Children's Hospital was conducted to guide the development of a new curriculum. Fellow perception of educational experience and board preparedness before and after introduction of the new curriculum was collected. Study period was from October 2018 to July 2021.
Results One hundred percent of the fellows responded to the needs assessment survey. A response rate of 100 and 87.5% were noted on mid-curriculum survey and postcurriculum survey, respectively. Key themes identified and incorporated into the curriculum included schedule structure, content, and delivery mode. A new didactic curriculum implementing a consistent schedule of shorter lectures grouped by organ system targeting ABP core content was created. After curriculum implementation, fellows had higher self-perception of board preparedness, and overall improved satisfaction.
Conclusion Our positive experience in implementing this curriculum provides a framework for individual programs to implement similar curricula, and could be utilized to aid in development of national NPM curricula.
Key Points
-
Fellowship didactic education varies significantly resulting in learner dissatisfaction and poor attendance.
-
Widespread need to restructure didactic curricula exists.
-
Our study provides a framework for future curricula.
Publication History
Received: 19 September 2022
Accepted: 19 February 2024
Article published online:
15 March 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 French HM, Leeman KT, Wambach JA, Malik SK, Reber KM. ONTPD Fellowship Directors Writing Group. Essentials of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine fellowship: an overview. J Perinatol 2022; 42 (02) 269-276
- 2 Pediatric subspecialties and general academic pediatric training. J Pediatr 1969; 75: 534-578
- 3 Philip AGS. The evolution of neonatology. Pediatr Res 2005; 58 (04) 799-815
- 4 American Board of Pediatrics. Data of Subspecialty Fellows by Demographics and Program Traits. Chapel Hill, NC:: American Board of Pediatrics;; 2018
- 5 Edgar L, McLean S, Hogan S, Hamstra S, Holmboe E. The Mile-stones Guidebook: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. 2020. . Accessed 7 March, 2024 at: https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/MilestonesGuidebook.pdf
- 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Perinatal-Neonatal Medicine. 2021 . Accessed 7 March, 2024 at: https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/329_neonatalperinatalmedicine_2021.pdf
- 7 American Board of Pediatrics. Content Outline for Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. 2016 . Accessed 7 March, 2024 at: https://www.abp.org/sites/abp/files/pdf/neonatal_perinatal_content_outline.pdf
- 8 American Board of Pediatrics. Pediatric Physicians Workforce Data Book. Chapel Hill, NC: American Board of Pediatrics; 2019 . Accessed 7 March, 2024 at: https://www.abp.org/sites/abp/files/pdf/workforcedata2019-2020.pdf
- 9 American Board of Pediatrics. Neonatal-Perinatal Board Pass rates. 2017 . Accessed at: https://www.abp.org/content/exam-pass-rates
- 10 Cicalese E, Wraight CL, Falck AJ, Izatt SD, Nair J, Lawrence KG. ONTPD Fellowship Directors Writing Group. Essentials of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine fellowship: part 2 - clinical education and experience. J Perinatol 2022; 42 (03) 410-415
- 11 Martin R, Fanaroff A, Walsh M. Fanaroff and Martin's Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. Florida, USA: Elsevier; 10th ed.
- 12 Brodsky D, Martin C. Neonatology Review. North Carolina: Lulu Press; . Accessed March 11, 2024 at: https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/neonatologyreview
- 13 French H, Gray M, Gillam-Krakauer M. et al. Flipping the classroom: a national pilot curriculum for physiology in neonatal-perinatal medicine. J Perinatol 2018; 38 (10) 1420-1427
- 14 Gray M, Gilliam-Krakauer M, French H. et al. Flipping the Classroom on Respiratory Physiology: The National Neonatology Curriculum. Pediatrics 2019; 144: 698
- 15 French H, Arias-Shah A, Gisondo C, Gray MM. Perspectives: The Flipped Classroom in Graduate Medical Education. Neoreviews 2020; 21 (03) e150-e156
- 16 Walsh K. Needs assessment and evaluation are vital components in curriculum design. Asian J Transfus Sci 2013; 7 (02) 165
- 17 Schneiderhan J, Guetterman TC, Dobson ML. Curriculum development: a how to primer. Fam Med Community Health 2019; 7 (02) e000046