Ultrasound Cross-Sectional Area in Median Nerve Axonal Loss and Demyelination in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract

Introduction Ultrasound is an effective diagnostic tool for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, it is unclear how ultrasound correlates with axonal loss and/or demyelination on electrodiagnostic studies (EDS). The objective of this study is to determine whether ultrasound cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve varies between patients with axonal loss or demyelination.

Methods A retrospective review was completed of patients who presented to an orthopaedic hand clinic with numbness/paresthesias over a 6-year period. Demographics, CTS symptoms scale 6 (CTS-6) scores, Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores, EDS results, and ultrasound results were collected. Median neuropathies were graded as normal, demyelination, or axonal loss using EDS reports. The data were analyzed with chi-square and t-tests.

Results In all, 383 hands were included (92 axonal loss, 182 demyelination only, and 108 neither). The average patient age was 52.2 and the average body mass index (BMI) was 31.7. The group consisted of 70.7% females, and 23.2% had diabetes. Patients with either axonal loss or demyelination had larger CSA and higher CTS-6 and BCTQ scores than patients with negative EDS. Patients with axonal loss also had larger CSA and higher CTS-6 and BCTQ scores than patients with demyelination only. The rates of positive ultrasound results between axonal loss and demyelination groups did not differ until the ultrasound cutoff was increased from 10 to 12 mm².

Conclusion Rates of positive ultrasound results (CSA ≥ 10 mm²) do not differ between wrists with axonal loss or demyelination alone. Therefore, the character of carpal tunnel neuropathy does not affect ultrasound's diagnostic ability. Additionally, CSA increases as wrists develop axonal loss, and an increased ultrasound cutoff of 12 mm² is correlated with this pathology.

Keywords

carpal tunnel - median nerve - nerve - ultrasonography - wrist

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Publication History

Article published online:
04 August 2023

• References

• 1 Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C. et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15 (12) 1273-1284
• 2 Practice parameter for carpal tunnel syndrome (summary statement). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 1993; 43 (11) 2406-2409
• 3 Wahab KW, Sanya EO, Adebayo PB, Babalola MO, Ibraheem HG. Carpal tunnel syndrome and other entrapment neuropathies. Oman Med J 2017; 32 (06) 449-454
• 4 Caetano MR. Axonal degeneration in association with carpal tunnel syndrome. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2003; 61 (01) 48-50
• 5 Stevens JC. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. AAEM minimonograph #26: the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1997; 20 (12) 1477-1486
• 6 Werner RA, Andary M. Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2011; 44 (04) 597-607
• 7 Leit ME, Weiser RW, Tomaino MM. Patient-reported outcome after carpal tunnel release for advanced disease: a prospective and longitudinal assessment in patients older than age 70. J Hand Surg Am 2004; 29 (03) 379-383
• 8 Preston D, Shapiro B. Median neuropathy at the wrist. In: Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann; 2005: 255-279
• 9 Fowler JR, Cipolli W, Hanson T. A comparison of three diagnostic tests for carpal tunnel syndrome using latent class analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (23) 1958-1961
• 10 Tavee J. Nerve conduction studies: basic concepts. Handb Clin Neurol 2019; 160: 217-224
• 11 Rubin DI. Needle electromyography: basic concepts. Handb Clin Neurol 2019; 160: 243-256
• 12 Fowler JR, Maltenfort MG, Ilyas AM. Ultrasound as a first-line test in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (03) 932-937
• 13 Buchberger W, Judmaier W, Birbamer G, Lener M, Schmidauer C. Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis with high-resolution sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159 (04) 793-798
• 14 Elnady B, Rageh EM, Ekhouly T. et al. Diagnostic potential of ultrasound in carpal tunnel syndrome with different etiologies: correlation of sonographic median nerve measures with electrodiagnostic severity. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20 (01) 634
• 15 Tahmaz M, Yoon MS, Schellinger PD, Philipps J. Cross-sectional area in median and ulnar nerve ultrasound correlates with hand volume. Muscle Nerve 2020; 62 (01) 83-88
• 16 Martikkala L, Mäkelä K, Himanen SL. Reduction in median nerve cross-sectional area at the forearm correlates with axon loss in carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2021; 6: 209-214
• 17 Moghtaderi A, Sanei-Sistani S, Sadoughi N, Hamed-Azimi H. Ultrasound evaluation of patients with moderate and severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Prague Med Rep 2012; 113 (01) 23-32
• 18 Martikkala L, Himanen SL, Virtanen K. et al. The neurophysiological severity of carpal tunnel syndrome cannot be predicted by median nerve cross-sectional area and wrist-to-forearm ratio. J Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 38 (04) 312-316
• 19 Chung T, Prasad K, Lloyd TE. Peripheral neuropathy: clinical and electrophysiological considerations. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2014; 24 (01) 49-65
• 20 Chen S, Andary M, Buschbacher R. et al. Electrodiagnostic reference values for upper and lower limb nerve conduction studies in adult populations. Muscle Nerve 2016; 54 (03) 371-377
• 21 El Miedany YM, Aty SA, Ashour S. Ultrasonography versus nerve conduction study in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: substantive or complementary tests?. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43 (07) 887-895