Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(11): 1476-1483
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771017
Original Article

Laryngeal Mask Airway Clinical Use and Training: A Survey of North American Neonatal Health Care Professionals

Beverley Robin   *
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center; Chicago, Illinois
,
Lamia M. Soghier   *
2   Department of Neonatology, Children's National Hospital, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences; Washington, District of Columbia
,
Akshaya Vachharajani 
3   Department of Child Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
,
Ahmed Moussa
4   Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
5   CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to explore North American neonatal health care professionals' (HCPs) experience, confidence, skill, and training with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA).

Study Design This was a cross-sectional survey.

Results The survey was completed by 2,159 HCPs from Canada and the United States. Seventy nine percent had no clinical experience with the LMA, and less than 20% considered the LMA an alternative to endotracheal intubation (EI). The majority had received LMA training; however, 28% of registered nurses, 18% of respiratory therapists, 17% of physicians, and 12% of midwives had never inserted an LMA in a mannequin. Less than a quarter of respondents agreed that the current biennial Neonatal Resuscitation Program instruction paradigm is sufficient for LMA training. All groups reported low confidence and skill with LMA insertion, and compared with all other groups, the respiratory therapists had the highest reported confidence and skill.

Conclusion This survey study, which is the first of its kind to include midwives, demonstrates that neonatal HCPs lack experience, confidence, skill, and training with the LMA, rarely use the device, and in general, do not consider the LMA as an alternative to EI. These findings contribute to, and support the findings of previous smaller studies, and in conjunction with the diminishing opportunities for EI, highlight the need for programs to emphasize the importance of the LMA for neonatal airway management and prioritize regular LMA training, with focus that parallels the importance placed on the skills of EI and mask ventilation.

Key Points

  • Lack of training for laryngeal mask airway use in neonatal resuscitation.

  • Neonatal health care professionals rarely use the laryngeal mask airway as an alternate airway device.

  • Neonatal health care professionals lack confidence and skill with the laryngeal mask airway.

Keywords

LMA - survey - North American - neonatal health care professionals - neonatal resuscitation

Authors' Contributions

L.M.S., B.R., and A.M. conceptualized this work, drafted the survey and the initial manuscript. A.M. conducted the statistical analysis. All authors reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approve the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.


* These authors contributed equally to this work.




Publication History

Received: 25 January 2023

Accepted: 02 June 2023

Article published online:
10 July 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Niermeyer S, Kattwinkel J, Van Reempts P. et al. International Guidelines for Neonatal Resuscitation: An excerpt from the Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: International Consensus on Science. Contributors and Reviewers for the Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines. Pediatrics 2000; 106 (03) E29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Weiner G, Zaichin J. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation. 8th ed.. Itasca: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2021
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Foglia EE, Ades A, Sawyer T. et al; NEAR4NEOS Investigators. Neonatal intubation practice and outcomes: an international registry study. Pediatrics 2019; 143 (01) e20180902
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Haubner LY, Barry JS, Johnston LC. et al. Neonatal intubation performance: room for improvement in tertiary neonatal intensive care units. Resuscitation 2013; 84 (10) 1359-1364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Wallenstein MB, Birnie KL, Arain YH. et al. Failed endotracheal intubation and adverse outcomes among extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 2016; 36 (02) 112-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schmölzer GM, Kamlin OC, O'Donnell CP, Dawson JA, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Assessment of tidal volume and gas leak during mask ventilation of preterm infants in the delivery room. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010; 95 (06) F393-F397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schilleman K, Witlox RS, Lopriore E, Morley CJ, Walther FJ, te Pas AB. Leak and obstruction with mask ventilation during simulated neonatal resuscitation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010; 95 (06) F398-F402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Finer NN, Rich W, Wang C, Leone T. Airway obstruction during mask ventilation of very low birth weight infants during neonatal resuscitation. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (03) 865-869
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Poulton DA, Schmölzer GM, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Assessment of chest rise during mask ventilation of preterm infants in the delivery room. Resuscitation 2011; 82 (02) 175-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wyckoff MH, Greif R, Morley PT. et al; Collaborators. 2022 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces. Circulation 2022; 146 (25) e483-e557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Madar J, Roehr CC, Ainsworth S. et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Newborn resuscitation and support of transition of infants at birth. Resuscitation 2021; 161: 291-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Qureshi MJ, Kumar M. Laryngeal mask airway versus bag-mask ventilation or endotracheal intubation for neonatal resuscitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 3 (03) CD003314
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Yamada NK, McKinlay CJ, Quek BH. et al. Supraglottic airways compared with face masks for neonatal resuscitation: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2022; 150 (03) e2022056568
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Trevisanuto D, Micaglio M, Ferrarese P, Zanardo V. The laryngeal mask airway: potential applications in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89 (06) F485-F489
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Brimacombe J. The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42 (11) 1017-1023
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kuypers KLAM, Lamberska T, Martherus T. et al. The effect of a face mask for respiratory support on breathing in preterm infants at birth. Resuscitation 2019; 144: 178-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Paterson SJ, Byrne PJ, Molesky MG, Seal RF, Finucane BT. Neonatal resuscitation using the laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology 1994; 80 (06) 1248-1253 , discussion 27A
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Trevisanuto D, Parotto M, Doglioni N, Ori C, Zanardo V, Micaglio M. The Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA): a new neonatal supraglottic device: comparison with Classic and ProSeal LMA in a manikin. Resuscitation 2012; 83 (01) 97-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gandini D, Brimacombe J. Manikin training for neonatal resuscitation with the laryngeal mask airway. Paediatr Anaesth 2004; 14 (06) 493-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bansal SC, Caoci S, Dempsey E, Trevisanuto D, Roehr CC. The laryngeal mask airway and its use in neonatal resuscitation: a critical review of where we are in 2017/2018. Neonatology 2018; 113 (02) 152-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pejovic NJ, Myrnerts Höök S, Byamugisha J. et al. A randomized trial of laryngeal mask airway in neonatal resuscitation. N Engl J Med 2020; 383 (22) 2138-2147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Roberts KD, Brown R, Lampland AL. et al. Laryngeal mask airway for surfactant administration in neonates: a randomized, controlled trial. J Pediatr 2018; 193: 40-46.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Gallup JA, Ndakor SM, Pezzano C, Pinheiro JMB. Randomized trial of surfactant therapy via laryngeal mask airway versus brief tracheal intubation in neonates born preterm. J Pediatr 2023; 254: 17-24.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Al Ali RA, Gautam B, Miller MR, Coulson S, Yuen D. Laryngeal mask airway for surfactant administration versus standard treatment methods in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Perinatol 2022; 39 (13) 1433-1440
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Liao CK, Lin HJ, Foo NP, Lin CC, Guo HR, Chen KT. Epinephrine administration via a laryngeal mask airway: what is the optimal dose?. Signa Vitae 2010; 5: 25-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Chen KT, Lin HJ, Guo HR, Lin MT, Lin CC. Feasibility study of epinephrine administration via laryngeal mask airway using a porcine model. Resuscitation 2006; 69 (03) 503-507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Brimacombe J, Gandini D. The laryngeal mask airway: potential applications in neonatal health care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1997; 26 (02) 171-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lyra JC, Guinsburg R, de Almeida MFB, Variane GFT, Souza Rugolo LMS. Use of laryngeal mask for neonatal resuscitation in Brazil: A national survey. Resusc Plus 2022; 13: 100336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Shah BA, Foulks A, Lapadula MC. et al. Laryngeal mask use in the neonatal population: a survey of practice providers at a regional tertiary care center in the United States. Am J Perinatol 2023; 40 (14) 1551-1557
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Trevisanuto D, Ferrarese P, Zanardo V, Chiandetti L. Laryngeal mask airway in neonatal resuscitation: a survey of current practice and perceived role by anaesthesiologists and paediatricians. Resuscitation 2004; 60 (03) 291-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Goel D, Shah D, Hinder M, Tracy M. Laryngeal mask airway use during neonatal resuscitation: a survey of practice across newborn intensive care units and neonatal retrieval services in Australian New Zealand Neonatal Network. J Paediatr Child Health 2020; 56 (09) 1346-1350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Mani S, Rawat M. Proficiency of laryngeal mask airway insertion skill in NRP certified providers. Am J Perinatol 2022; 39 (09) 1008-1014
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Mizumoto H, Motokura K, Kurosaki A, Hata D. Introduction of laryngeal mask airway in Japan, and its rescue use for newborns. Pediatr Int 2018; 60 (10) 954-956
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Belkhatir K, Scrivens A, O'Shea JE, Roehr CC. Experience and training in endotracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway use in neonates: results of a national survey. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2021; 106 (02) 223-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kozhimannil KB, Henning-Smith C, Hung P. The practice of midwifery in rural us hospitals. J Midwifery Womens Health 2016; 61 (04) 411-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Grumbach K, Hart LG, Mertz E, Coffman J, Palazzo L. Who is caring for the underserved? A comparison of primary care physicians and nonphysician clinicians in California and Washington. Ann Fam Med 2003; 1 (02) 97-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 O'Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: success rates, duration, and adverse effects. Pediatrics 2006; 117 (01) e16-e21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Herrick HM, Glass KM, Johnston LC. et al; for the NEAR4NEOS Investigators. Comparison of neonatal intubation practice and outcomes between the neonatal intensive care unit and delivery room. Neonatology 2020; 117 (01) 65-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Lee HC, Rhee CJ, Sectish TC, Hintz SR. Changes in attendance at deliveries by pediatric residents 2000 to 2005. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26 (02) 129-134
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Sand L, Szatkowski L, Kwok TC. et al. Observational cohort study of changing trends in non-invasive ventilation in very preterm infants and associations with clinical outcomes. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2022; 107 (02) 150-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Regin Y, Gie A, Eerdekens A, Toelen J, Debeer A. Ventilation and respiratory outcome in extremely preterm infants: trends in the new millennium. Eur J Pediatr 2022; 181 (05) 1899-1907
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Perlman JM, Wyllie J, Kattwinkel J. et al; Neonatal Resuscitation Chapter Collaborators. Neonatal Resuscitation Chapter Collaborators. Part 7: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2015 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations (Reprint). Pediatrics 2015; 136 (Suppl. 02) S120-S166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Gozzo YF, Cummings CL, Chapman RL, Bizzarro MJ, Mercurio MR. Who is performing medical procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit?. J Perinatol 2011; 31 (03) 206-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Pediatrics. Effective: July 1, 2022. Accessed June 20, 2023 at:: https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/320_pediatrics_2022.pdf
    PubMed