Download PDF
neuroreha 2017; 09(04): 153-159
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-120315
Schwerpunkt Robotik
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Roboter in der Neurorehabilitation

Jan Mehrholz
,
Simone Thomas
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die robotergestützte Therapie erlebt einen regelrechten Aufschwung. Wie spiegelt sich ihr Einsatz in den Leitlinien der wichtigsten Gesellschaften wider? Welche Geräte werden idealerweise eingesetzt? Bei welchen Erkrankungen profitieren Patienten am deutlichsten vom Einsatz der modernen Technologie?

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Asimov I. Runaround. Pages 40. In: Asimov I. ed. I, Robot. New York City: Doubleday; 1950: 40
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Calabro RA, Cacciola A, Berte F. et al. Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: Where are we now?. Neurol Sci 2016; 4: 503-514
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Calabro RS, Russo M, Naro A. et al. Robotic gait training in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: Can virtual reality make the difference? Findings from a randomized controlled trial. J Neurol Sci 2017; 25-30
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Carda S, Invernizzi M, Baricich A. et al. Robotic gait training is not superior to conventional treadmill training in Parkinson disease: A single-blind randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012; 9: 1027-1034
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Carpinella I, Cattaneo D, Bertoni R. et al. Robot training of upper limb in multiple sclerosis: Comparing protocols with or without manipulative task components. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2012; 3: 351-360
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Cavallo F, Esposito D, Rovini E. et al. Preliminary evaluation of SensHand V1 in assessing motor skills performance in Parkinson disease. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2013; 6650466
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R. et al. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Colombo G, Wirz M, Dietz V. Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients. Spinal Cord. 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 9 da Silveira Carvalho I, Pinto SM, Chagas DDV. et al. Robotic gait training for individuals with cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 10 de Ávila BEF, Angsantikul P, Li J. et al. Micromotor-enabled active drug delivery for in vivo treatment of stomach infection. Nature Communications 2017; 1: 272
    Google Scholar
  • 11 DGN: Rehabilitation von sensomotorischen Störungen. In: Diener HC, Weimar C, Berlit P. et al., eds. Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2012: 1051ff
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Dohle C, Tholen R, Wittenberg H. et al. Rehabilitation der Mobilität nach Schlaganfall (ReMoS). S2e-Leitlinie. Neurol Rehabil 2015; 7: 355-494
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Gandolfi M, Geroin C, Picelli A. et al. Robot-assisted vs. sensory integration training in treating gait and balance dysfunctions in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 318
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Geigle P, Kallins M. Exoskeleton-assisted walking for people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 7: 1493-1495
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Graham AC. The Book of Lieh-tzŭ: A Classic of Tao. New York: Columbia University Press; 1960
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Harvey LA. Physiotherapy rehabilitation for people with spinal cord injuries. Journal of Physiotherapy 2016; 1: 4-11
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Hesse S, Schmidt H, Werner C. et al. Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control. Curr Opin Neurol 2003; 6: 705-710
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M. et al. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 6: 915-920
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Hesse S, Mehrholz J, Werner C. Robot-assisted upper and lower limb rehabilitation after stroke: Walking and arm/hand function. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008; 18: 330-336
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Hesse S, Waldner A, Tomelleri C. Innovative gait robot for the repetitive practice of floor walking and stair climbing up and down in stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010; 30
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Hesse S, Tomelleri C, Bardeleben A. et al. Robot-assisted practice of gait and stair climbing in nonambulatory stroke patients. J Rehabil Res Dev 2012; 4: 613-622
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Hill D. Mechanical engineering in the medieval near east. Scientific American 1991; 64-69
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Hill D. A history of engineering in classical and medieval times. London, New York: Routledge; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Humphrey J, Oleson J, Sherwood A. Greek and Roman technology: A sourcebook. Annotated translations of Greek and Latin texts and documents. London, New York: Routledge; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Krebs HI, Palazzolo JJ, Dipietro L. et al. Rehabilitation robotics: Performance-based progressive robot-assisted therapy. Auton Robots. 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Krebs HI, Caurin G, Battistella L. Rehabilitation robotics, orthotics and prosthetics for the upper extremity. In: Selzer M, Clarke S, Cohen L. et al., eds Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2014: 177-197
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Krebs HI. On a unique fellow and a good friend: Celebrating the life of Stefan Hesse and his contributions to rehabilitation robotics, 1960–2016. NeuroRehabilitation 2017; 1: 1-3
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Lamers I, Maris A, Severijns D. et al. Upper limb rehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2016; 8: 773-793
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Lang JE, Mannava S, Floyd AJ. et al. Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 10: 1296-1299
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Lee Y, Chen K, Ren Y. et al. Robot-guided ankle sensorimotor rehabilitation of patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2017; 65-70
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Lefmann S, Russo R, Hillier S. The effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training for paediatric gait disorders: Systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2017; 1: 1
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Leon D, Cortes M, Elder J. et al. tDCS does not enhance the effects of robot-assisted gait training in patient with subacute stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2017; Jul 6 DOI: 10.3233/RNN-170734
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG. et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine 2010; 19: 1772-1783
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Louie DR, Eng JJ, Lam T. Gait speed using powered robotic exoskeletons after spinal cord injury: A systematic review and correlational study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2015; 1: 1-10
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Louie DR, Eng JJ. Powered robotic exoskeletons in post-stroke rehabilitation of gait: A scoping review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2016; 1: 1-10
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Mehrholz J, Kugler J, Pohl M. Locomotor training for walking after spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database Syst Reviews 2012; 11: CD006676
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Mehrholz J, Kugler J, Storch A. et al. Treadmill training for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015; 9 Art. No.: CD007830. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007830.pub4
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Platz T. et al. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015; 11 Art. No.: CD006876. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub4
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Mehrholz J. Towards evidence-based practice of technology-based gait rehabilitation after stroke. Physiotherapy Research International 2016; 4: 201-202
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Mehrholz J, Kugler J, Storch A. et al. Treadmill training for patients with Parkinson’s disease. An abridged version of a Cochrane Review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2016; 5: 704-713
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Mehrholz J, Elsner B, Thomas S. Elektromechanisches und roboterassistiertes Training der oberen Extremität. neuroreha 2017; 9: 160-166
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Mehrholz J, Harvey L, Thomas S. et al. Is body-weight supported treadmill training or robotic-assisted gait training superior to overground gait training and other forms of physiotherapy in people with spinal cord injury? A systematic review. Spinal Cord 2017; 55: 722-729
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Pohl M. et al. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017; 5: CD006185
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Pohl M. et al. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. An updated review. Stroke 2017; 8: e188-e189
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Meuleman J, van Asseldonk E, van Oort G. et al. LOPES II – Design and evaluation of an admittance controlled gait training robot with shadow-leg approach. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2016; 3: 352-363
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Miguel Cruz A, Rios Rincon AM, Rodriguez Duenas WR. What does the literature say about using robots on children with disabilities?. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2017; 5: 429-440
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Nam KY, Kim HJ, Kwon BS. et al. Robot-assisted gait training (Lokomat) improves walking function and activity in people with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2017; 24
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Picelli A, Melotti C, Origano F. et al. Robot-assisted gait training in patients with Parkinson disease: A randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012; 4: 353-361
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Pilleri M, Weis L, Zabeo L. et al. Overground robot assisted gait trainer for the treatment of drug-resistant freezing of gait in Parkinson disease. J Neurol Sci 2015; 1 –2 75-78
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Platz T. Die S2-Leitlinie „Rehabilitative Therapie bei Armparese nach Schlaganfall“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurorehabilitation. NeuroGeriatrie 2011; 8: 104-116
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Platz T. Practice Guidelines in Neurorehabilitation. Neurology International Open 2017; 03: E148-E152
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Pompa A, Morone G, Iosa M. et al. Does robot-assisted gait training improve ambulation in highly disabled multiple sclerosis people? A pilot randomized control trial. Mult Scler 2017; 5: 696-703
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Riener R. The Cybathlon promotes the development of assistive technology for people with physical disabilities. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2016; 1: 49
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Rodgers H, Shaw L, Bosomworth H. et al. Robot-assisted training for the upper limb after stroke (RATULS): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2017; 1: 340
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Rong W, Li W, Pang M. et al. A neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and robot hybrid system for multi-joint coordinated upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2017; 34
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Ruiz J, Labas MP, Triche EW. et al. Combination of robot-assisted and conventional body-weight-supported treadmill training improves gait in persons with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. J Neurol Phys Ther 2013; 4: 187-193
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Schmidt H, Sorowka D, Hesse S. et al. Development of a robotic walking simulator for gait rehabilitation. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2003; 10: 281-286
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Schwartz I, Sajin A, Moreh E. et al. Robot-assisted gait training in multiple sclerosis patients: A randomized trial. Mult Scler 2012; 6: 881-890
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Severijns D, Octavia JR, Kerkhofs L. et al. Investigation of fatigability during repetitive robot-mediated arm training in people with multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 2015; 7: e0133729
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Simonetti D, Zollo L, Milighetti S. et al. Literature review on the effects of tDCS coupled with robotic therapy in post stroke upper limb rehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci 2017; 268
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Singh I. Robotics in urological surgery: Review of current status and maneuverability, and comparison of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopy. Computer Aided Surgery ISSN: 2011; 1: 38-45
    Google Scholar
  • 62 Straudi S, Benedetti MG, Venturini E. et al. Does robot-assisted gait training ameliorate gait abnormalities in multiple sclerosis? A pilot randomized-control trial. NeuroRehabilitation 2013; 4: 555-563
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Straudi S, Fanciullacci C, Martinuzzi C. et al. The effects of robot-assisted gait training in progressive multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial. Mult Scler 2016; 3: 373-384
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Straudi S, Manfredini F, Lamberti N. et al. The effectiveness of robot-assisted gait training versus conventional therapy on mobility in severely disabled progressIve MultiplE sclerosis patients (RAGTIME): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017; 1: 88
    Google Scholar
  • 65 Svinnen E, Lefeber N, Keersmaecker E, Kerckhofs E. Roboter-assistierte Gangrehabilitation bei Patienten mit Hirn- bzw. Rückenmarksverletzungen: Aktueller Stand und zukünftige Entwicklung. neuroreha 2017; 4 Ausgabe Roboter
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Swinnen E, Beckwee D, Pinte D. et al. Treadmill training in multiple sclerosis: Can body weight support or robot assistance provide added value? A systematic review. Mult Scler Int 2012; 240274
    Google Scholar
  • 67 Thiele E. Karel Čapek, Biografie. Leipzig Reclam; 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 68 Tomelleri C, Waldner A, Werner C. et al. Adaptive locomotor training on an end-effector gait robot: Evaluation of the ground reaction forces in different training conditions. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2011; 5975492
    Google Scholar
  • 69 Valenti Soler M, Aguera-Ortiz L, Olazaran Rodriguez J. et al. Social robots in advanced dementia. Front Aging Neurosci 2015; 133
    Google Scholar
  • 70 Valentín-Gudiol M, Mattern-Baxter K, Girabent-Farrés M. et al. Treadmill interventions in children under six years of age at risk of neuromotor delay, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 71 Vaney C, Gattlen B, Lugon-Moulin V. et al. Robotic-assisted step training (lokomat) not superior to equal intensity of over-ground rehabilitation in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012; 3: 212-221
    Google Scholar
  • 72 Veerbeek JM, Langbroek-Amersfoort AC, van Wegen EE. et al. Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 2: 107-121
    Google Scholar
  • 73 Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R. et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2016; 6: e98-e169
    Google Scholar
  • 74 Xie X, Sun H, Zeng Q. et al. Do patients with multiple sclerosis derive more benefit from robot-assisted gait training compared with conventional walking therapy on motor function? A meta-analysis. Front Neurol 2017; 260
    Google Scholar