Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-110180
Aktuelle Aspekte der Lungentransplantation
Lung Transplantation. Chances and PossibilitiesPublication History
Publication Date:
05 September 2018 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/zblchir/2018S01/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0043-110180_zbc3565972_cme-1.jpg)
Zusammenfassung
Seit der ersten Lungentransplantation im Jahr 1963 ist diese Operation zu einer erfolgreichen und etablierten Therapie für Patienten mit Lungenversagen geworden. Obwohl die Sterblichkeitsraten im Vergleich zu anderen Organtransplantationen höher sind, wurden dank Verbesserungen in den Bereichen Technik, Organkonservierung, Immunsuppression und Antibiotika sowie diagnostischer Mittel und Therapie gegen Abstoßung bemerkenswerte Fortschritte erzielt.
Abstract
Since 1963, the lung transplantation has become a successful and established therapy for patients with lung failure. Even though mortality is higher than with other solid organ transplantations, remarkable progress has been made due to improved techniques, improved conservation, immunosuppression and antibiotics as well as diagnostic tools and therapy for rejection. The survival for lung transplantation is good. The survival rate after 3 months is 88%, after 1 year 79% and after 3, 5, and 10 years 64%, 53%, and 31%, respectively. But chronic rejection, presenting as chronic lung allograft dysfunction, is still a major problem after lung transplantation. An overview of indications and contraindications, surgical techniques and results is given in this article.
-
Aktuelle Aspekte der Lungentransplantation werden beschrieben.
-
Seit 1963 hat sich die Lungentransplantation zu einer erfolgreichen und anerkannten Therapie für Patienten entwickelt.
-
Auch wenn die Langzeitergebnisse der Lungentransplantation noch hinter den Ergebnissen anderer Organe zurückliegen, so haben sich sowohl Überleben als auch die Lebensqualität nach der Transplantation durch verbesserte Operationstechniken und Organkonservierung, durch optimierte Immunsuppression und antibiotische Therapiekonzepte und besonders durch die Diagnostik und Therapie von Abstoßungsprozessen deutlich gesteigert.
-
Die Überlebensraten nach Lungentransplantation liegen für die ersten 3 Monate bei 89% und für das erste Jahr bei 83%. Nach 3 Jahren beträgt die Überlebensrate 68%, nach 5 Jahren 61% und nach 10 Jahren 36%. Dennoch ist die chronische Abstoßung in ihrer Form als Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD) das größte Problem.
-
Die Akquise von Spenderorganen ist nach wie vor problematisch. Bei nur einem Viertel aller Organspender in Deutschland können die Lungen erfolgreich transplantiert werden. Auch neuere Verfahren zur Verbesserung marginaler Spenderorgane (ex vivo Lung Perfusion EVLP) haben die Situation nicht wesentlich verändert.
-
Literatur
- 1 Trulock EP, Edwards LB, Taylor DO. et al. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-second official adult lung and heart-lung transplant report – 2005. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005; 24: 956-967
- 2 Charman SC, Sharples LD, McNeil KD. et al. Assessment of survival benefit after lung transplantation by patient diagnosis. J Heart Lung Transplant 2002; 21: 226-232
- 3 Demeester J, Smits J, Persijn GG. et al. Listing for lung transplantation: Life expectancy and transplant effect, stratified by type of end-stage lung disease, the Eurotransplant Experience. J Heart Lung Transplant 2001; 20: 518-524
- 4 Thabut G, Mal H, Castier Y. et al. Survival benefit of lung transplantation for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 469-475
- 5 Geertsma A, ten Vergert EM, Bonsel GJ. et al. Does lung transplantation prolong life? A comparison of survival with and without transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 1998; 17: 511-516
- 6 Hosenpud JD, Bennett LE, Keck BM. et al. Effect of diagnosis on survival benefit of lung transplantation for end-stage lung disease. Lancet 1998; 351: 24-27
- 7 Gerbase MW, Spiliopoulos A, Rochat T. et al. Health-related quality of life following single or bilateral lung transplantation: a 7-year comparison to unctional outcome. Chest 2005; 128: 1371-1378
- 8 Gross C, Savik K, Bolman M. et al. Long-term health status and quality-of-life outcomes of lung transplant recipients. Chest 1995; 108: 1587-1593
- 9 Maish AB. Priorities for lung transplantation among patients with cystic fibrosis. JAMA 2002; 287: 1524-1525
- 10 Weill D, Benden C, Corris PA. et al. A consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2014 – an update from the Pulmonary Transplantation Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015; 34: 1-15 doi:10.1016/j.healun.2014.06.014
- 11 Connors jr. A, Dawson N, Thomas C. et al. Outcomes following acute exacerbation of severe chronic obstructive lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154: 959-967
- 12 Fishman A, Martinez F, Naunheim K. et al. A randomized trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema. New Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2059-2073
- 13 Celli BR, Cote CG, Marin JM. et al. The body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1005-1012
- 14 Eskander A, Waddell TK, Faughnan ME. et al. BODE index and quality of life in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease before and after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2011; 30: 1334-1341
- 15 King jr. TE, Bradford WZ, Castro-Bernardini S. et al. A phase 3 trial of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 2083-2092
- 16 Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ. et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183: 788-824
- 17 Brown AW, Shlobin OA, Weir N. et al. Dynamic patient counseling: a novel concept in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2012; 142: 1005-1010
- 18 du Bois RM, Weycker D, Albera C. et al. Six-minute-walk test in idiopathicpulmonary fibrosis: test validation and minimal clinically important difference. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183: 1231-1237
- 19 Collard HR, King jr. TE, Bartelson BB. et al. Changes in clinical and physiologic variables predict survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 168: 538-542
- 20 du Bois RM, Weycker D, Albera C. et al. Ascertainment of individual risk of mortality for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 184: 459-466
- 21 Flaherty KR, Andrei AC, Murray S. et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: prognostic value of changes in physiology and six-minute-walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174: 803-809
- 22 Lederer DJ, Arcasoy SM, Wilt JS. et al. Six-minute-walk distance predicts waiting list survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174: 659-664
- 23 Rosenbluth DB, Wilson K, Ferkol T. et al. Lung function decline in cystic fibrosis patients and timing for lung transplantation referral. Chest 2004; 126: 412-419
- 24 Liou TG, Adler FR, Cahill BC. et al. Survival effect of lung transplantation among patients with cystic fibrosis. JAMA 2001; 286: 2683-2689
- 25 US Department of Health and Human Services HRaSA, United Network for Organ Sharing. 2003 annual report of the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (accessed April 11, 2006). Im Internet: https://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/archives.aspx Stand: Juli 2018
- 26 Egan TM, Detterbeck FC, Mill MR. et al. Long-term results of lung transplantation for cystic fibrosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 22: 602-609
- 27 De Soyza A, Archer L, Wardle J. et al. Pulmonary transplantation for cystic fibrosis: pre-transplant recipient characteristics in patients dying of peri-operative sepsis. J Heart Lung Transplant 2003; 22: 764-769
- 28 Dobbin C, Maley M, Harkness J. et al. The impact of pan-resistant bacterial pathogens on survival after lung transplantation in cystic fibrosis: results from a single large referral centre. J Hosp Infect 2004; 56: 277-282
- 29 DʼAlonzo GE, Barst RJ, Ayres SM. et al. Survival in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Results from a national prospective registry. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 343-349
- 30 Miyamoto S, Nagaya N, Satoh T. et al. Clinical correlates and prognostic significance of six-minute walk test in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 487-492
- 31 Sitbon O, Humbert M, Nunes H. et al. Long-term intravenous epoprostenol infusion in primary pulmonary hypertension: prognostic factors and survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 780-788
- 32 McLaughlin VV, Shillington A, Rich S. Survival in primary pulmonary hypertension: the impact of epoprostenol therapy. Circulation 2002; 106: 1477-1482
- 33 Wensel R, Opitz CF, Anker SD. et al. Assessment of survival in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension: importance of cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Circulation 2002; 106: 319-324
- 34 Conte JV, Gaine SP, Orens JB. et al. The influence of continuous intravenous prostacyclin therapy for primary pulmonary hypertension on the timing and outcome of transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 1998; 17: 679-685
- 35 Robbins IM, Christman BW, Newman JH. et al. A survey of diagnostic practices and the use of epoprostenol in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Chest 1998; 114: 1269-1275
- 36 Strueber M, Reichenspurner H. Die Einführung des Lungenallokations-Scores für die Lungentransplantation in Deutschland. Dtsch Arztebl 2011; 108: A-2424
- 37 Venkateswaran RV, Patchell VB, Wilson IC. et al. Early donor management increases the retrieval rate of lungs for transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85: 278-286
- 38 Kofidis T, Strueber M, Warnecke G. et al. Antegrade versus retrograde perfusion of the donor lung: impact on the early reperfusion phase. Transpl Int 2003; 16: 801-805
- 39 Van RD. Thoracic organs: current preservation technology and future prospects; part 1: lung. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2010; 15: 150-155
- 40 Arnaoutakis GJ, Allen JG, Merlo CA. et al. Low potassium dextran is superior to university of Wisconsin solution in high-risk lung transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010; 29: 1380-1387
- 41 Marasco SF, Bailey M, McGlade D. Effect of donor preservation solution and survival in lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2011; 30: 414-419
- 42 Pizanis N, Gillner S, Kamler M. et al. Cold-induced injury to lung epithelial cells can be inhibited by iron chelators – implications for lung preservation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 40: 948-955
- 43 Kamler M, Pizanis N. Aktueller Stand der Lungentransplantation. Indikation, Technik, Ergebnisse. Z Herz-Thorax-Gefäßchir 2013; 27: 235-242
- 44 Yusen RD, Christie JD, Edwards LB. et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirtieth Adult Lung and Heart-Lung Transplant Report – 2013; focus theme: age. J Heart Lung Transplant 2013; 32: 965-978
- 45 Kreider M, Hadjiliadis D, Kotloff RM. Candidate selection, timing of listing, and choice of procedure for lung transplantation. Clin Chest Med 2011; 32: 199-211
- 46 Gottlieb J. Lung transplantation for interstitial lung diseases and pulmonary hypertension. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 34: 281-287
- 47 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation – ISHLT. ISHLT Registry 2016/Annual ISHLT Registry Reports. J Heart Lung Transplant 2016; 35: 1149-1205