Download PDF
Psychiatr Prax 2018; 45(06): 299-306
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-105775
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Psychoedukationsmodul Rückkehr an den Arbeitsplatz – Eine Interventionsstudie

Return to Work: A Psychoeducational Module – An Intervention Study
Patricia Hölzle
Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
,
Anna Baumbach
Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
,
Lena Mernyi
Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
,
Johannes Hamann
Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 May 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel der Studie Im Mittelpunkt der vorliegenden Studie stand die Frage, inwieweit Patienten von einem Psychoedukationsmodul zum Thema Rückkehr an den Arbeitsplatz profitieren können.

Methoden Durch eine randomisiert-kontrollierte Studie (n = 82) wurden die Effekte auf die Einstellungen zum Arbeitsplatz, Wissen zu rechtlichen Aspekten bei der Rückkehr und Dauer bis zur Rückkehr evaluiert.

Ergebnisse Die Psychoedukationsgruppe erhöhte die Sicherheit bei der Rückkehr, allerdings nicht die Dauer bis zum Wiedereinstieg.

Schlussfolgerung Das Psychoedukationsmodul wurde sehr gut angenommen und stellt offenbar eine gute Ergänzung zur sozialpädagogischen Einzelberatung dar.

Abstract

Objective This study evaluated a psychoeducational intervention that aimed to facilitate return to work.

Methods The randomized-controlled study trial was established at three psychiatric hospitals. The status of permanent employment in an age group of 18 to 60 served as main inclusion criterion. The intervention consisted of 5 sessions and covered topics such as disclosure of the diagnosis to colleagues and supervisors or legal frameworks in the return-to-work process. Participants of the control group received treatment as usual.

Results The informative value of the comparisons was decreased by strong differences between the groups at baseline due to an allocation bias. However, participants of the intervention group felt more secure and prepared regarding their return to the workplace. In addition, participants developed a higher level of understanding regarding their rights within the legal frameworks when returning to work. More participants of the control group returned to work within 3 months. The decisive factor for a successful return to work was the intention of the participants to return at baseline.

Conclusion The psychoeducational program was well accepted among participants and appeared to be a useful addition to individual counseling by social workers. However,the program did not increase the likelihood to return to work within three months.

Schlüsselwörter

Arbeitsunfähigkeit - Probleme am Arbeitsplatz - Rückkehr an den Arbeitsplatz - Psychoedukation - psychische Erkrankungen

Keywords

sickness absence - occupational problems - return to work - psychoeducation - mental disorders
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales. Teilhabebericht der Bundesregierung über die Lebenslagen von Menschen mit Beeinträchtigungen. 2013. Im Internet: http://www.bmas.de/DE/Service/Medien/Publikationen/a125-13-teilhabebericht.html (Stand: 01.02.2017)
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Wicher K, Bischoff J, Firle M. et al. Individuelle Integrationspfade für psychisch kranke und behinderte Menschen: Wege zur Teilhabe am Arbeitsleben. Hamburg: Feldhaus; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Thornicroft G, Brohan E, Rose D. et al. Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination against people with schizophrenia: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2009; 373: 408-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lasalvia A, Zoppei S, Van Bortel T. et al. Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination reported by people with major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2013; 381: 55-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cechnicki A, Angermeyer MC, Bielanska A. Anticipated and experienced stigma among people with schizophrenia: its nature and correlates. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2011; 46: 643-650
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Switaj P, Wciorka J, Grygiel P. et al. Experiences of stigma and discrimination among users of mental health services in Poland. Transcult Psychiatry 2012; 49: 51-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 The Shaw Trust. Mental Health: Still the last workplace taboo?. London: The Shaw Trust; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Manning C, White PD. Attitudes of employers to the mentally ill. Psychiatrist 1995; 19: 541-543
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Glozier N. Workplace Effects of the Stigmatization of Depression. J Occup Environ Med 1998; 40: 793-800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mendel R, Kissling W, Reichhart T. et al. Managers’ reactions towards employees’ disclosure of psychiatric or somatic diagnoses. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2015; 24: 146-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bäuml J, Pitschel-Walz G. Psychoedukation. Psychiatr Psychother up2date 2011; 5: 161-176
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wiedemann G, Klingberg S, Pitschel-Walz G. Psychoedukative Interventionen in der Behandlung von Patienten mit schizophrenen Störungen. Nervenarzt 2003; 74: 789-808
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rahimi A, Ahmadpanah M, Shamsaei F. et al. Effect of adjuvant sleep hygiene psychoeducation and lorazepam on depression and sleep quality in patients with major depressive disorders: results from a randomized three-arm intervention. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2016; 12: 1507-1515
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 von Wachter M, Hendrischke A. Das Manual – Psychoedukation bei chronischem Schmerz. In: von Wachter M, Hendrischke A. Hrsg. Psychoedukation bei chronischen Schmerzen: Manual und Materialien. Berlin: Springer; 2016: 29-37
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Provencher M, Bélanger M, Shriqui C. et al. Psychoeducation for overweight patients with psychiatric disorders: The Wellness program developed in Quebec. Encephale 2016; 42: 201-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Arends I, Bruinvels DJ, Rebergen DS. et al. Interventions to facilitate return to work in adults with adjustment disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006389.pub2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Sampson A. Interventions to improve return to work outcomes in individuals with mental health conditions. 2015. Im Internet: http://wwwiscrrcomau/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/321169/Interventions-to-improve-RTW-outcomespdf (Stand: 01.02.2017)
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Nieuwenhuijsen K, Faber B, Verbeek JH. et al. Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Nigatu YT, Liu Y, Uppal M. et al. Interventions for enhancing return to work in individuals with a common mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychol Med 2016; 46: 3263-3274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Soegaard HJ. Variation in effect of intervention studies in research on sickness absence. Open Access J Clin Trials 2012; 4: 1-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Volker D, Zijlstra-Vlasveld MC, Anema JR. et al. Effectiveness of a blended web-based intervention on return to work for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4097.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Vlasveld MC, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Ader HJ. et al. Collaborative care for sick-listed workers with major depressive disorder: a randomised controlled trial from the Netherlands Depression Initiative aimed at return to work and depressive symptoms. J Occup Rehabil 2013; 70: 223-230
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Nystuen P, Hagen KB. Solution-focused intervention for sick listed employees with psychological problems or muscle skeletal pain: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2006; 6: 69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Martin MHT, Nielsen MBD, Madsen IEH. et al. Effectiveness of a Coordinated and Tailored Return-to-Work Intervention for Sickness Absence Beneficiaries with Mental Health Problems. J Occup Rehabil 2013; 23: 621-630
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Pedersen P, Sogaard HJ, Labriola M. et al. Effectiveness of psychoeducation in reducing sickness absence and improving mental health in individuals at risk of having a mental disorder: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2087-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Koch S, Hedlund S, Rosenthal S. et al. Stressbewältigung am Arbeitsplatz: Ein stationäres Gruppentherapieprogramm. Verhaltenstherapie 2006; 16: 7-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Roder V, Zorn P, Pfammatter M. et al. Praxishandbuch zur verhaltenstherapeutischen Behandlung schizophren Erkrankter. Bern: Huber; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Roder V, Müller DR, Zorn P. Therapieverfahren zu sozialen Fertigkeiten bei schizophren Erkrankten in der Arbeitsrehabilitation. Z Klin Psychol Psychother 2006; 35: 256-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hölzle P, Söhmisch L, Mendel R. et al. Erfolgreich zurück an den Arbeitsplatz. Ist ein spezifisches psychoedukatives Angebot für Patienten in der Akutpsychiatrie sinnvoll?. Nervenheilkunde 2014; 33: 811-815
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hall A, Siefer A. BIBB/BAuA-Erwerbstätigenbefragung 2011/2012, Arbeit und Beruf im Wandel, Erwerb und Verwertung beruflicher Qualifikationen. 2012. Im Internet: http://www.baua.de/de/Informationen-fuer-die-Praxis/Statistiken/Arbeitsbedingungen/pdf/Fragebogen.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4 (Stand: 01.02.2017)
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Linden M, Oberle-Thiemann C, Weidner C. Krankschreiben kann schaden. MMW Fortschr Med 2003; 18: 33-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Streb M, Michael T. Posttraumatische Belastungsstörung bei medizinischen Rettungskräften. Psychother Dialog 2009; 16: 63-65
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Nielsen MBD, Madsen IEH, Bültmann U. et al. Predictors of return to work in employees sick-listed with mental health problems: findings from a longitudinal study. Eur J Public Health 2011; 21: 806-811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Bürger W, Dietsche S, Morfeld M. et al. Multiperspektivische Einschätzungen zur Wahrscheinlichkeit der Wiedereingliederung von Patienten ins Erwerbsleben nach orthopädischer Rehabilitation – Ergebnisse und prognostische Relevanz. Rehabilitation 2001; 40: 217-225
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 de Vente W, Kamphuis JH, Emmelkamp PM. et al. Individual and group cognitive-behavioral treatment for work-related stress complaints and sickness absence: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Health Psychol 2008; 13: 214-231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 van Oostrom SH, van Mechelen W, Terluin B. et al. A workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with distress: results of a random-ised controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil 2010; 67: 596-602
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Bakker IM, Terluin B, van Marwick HJ. Cluster-randomized trial evaluating an intervention for patients with stress-related mental disorders and sick leave in primary care. PLoS Clin Trials DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0020026.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Heiden M, Lyskov E, Nakata M. Evaluation of cognitive behavioral training and physical activity for patients with stress related illnesses: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 366-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Grossi G, Santell B. Quasi-experimental evaluation of a stress-management program for female county and municipal employees on long-term sick leave due to work-related psychological complaints. J Rehabil Med 2009; 41: 632-638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Ejeby K, Savitskij R, Öst LG. Symptom reduction due to psychosocial interventions is not accompanied by a reduction in sick leave: results from a randomized controlled trial in primary care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2014; 32: 67-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Nieuwenhuijsen K, Bultmann U, Neumeyer-Gromen A. et al. Interventions to improve occupational health in depressed people. Cochrane Libr DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub2.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Plößl I. Evaluation eines Trainingsprogrammes zur beruflichen Rehabilitation von Menschen mit psychischer Erkrankung. [Dissertation]. Tübingen: Fakultät für Sozial- und Verhaltenswissenschaften der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Van Oostrom SH, van Mechelen W, Terluin B. A workplace intervention for sicklisted employees with distress: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil 2010; 67: 596-602
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Read J, Baker S. Not Just Sticks and Stones. A Survey of the Stigma, Taboos and Discrimination Experienced by People with Mental Health Problems. London: MIND; 1996
    Google Scholar