Download PDF
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2017; 67(09/10): 391-400
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-105482
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die Eignung der HoNOS (Health of the Nation Outcome Scales) zur Erfassung des Verlaufs und des Schweregrads depressiver Symptomatik im stationären Setting

Assessing Change of Depressive Symptoms and Severity of Depression in an Inpatient Setting : Performance of the HoNOS (Health of the Nation Outcome Scales)
Sonja Fankhauser
1   Privatklinik Meiringen, Bern, Schweiz
,
Barbara Hochstrasser
1   Privatklinik Meiringen, Bern, Schweiz
,
Marcus Sievers
1   Privatklinik Meiringen, Bern, Schweiz
,
Michael Soyka
1   Privatklinik Meiringen, Bern, Schweiz
2   Psychiatrische Klinik, Universität München
3   Medical Park Chiemseeblick, Fachklinik für Psychosomatik, Bernau am Chiemsee
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 04 July 2016

akzeptiert   02 March 2017

Publication Date:
29 June 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel Diese Studie untersuchte die Eignung der „Health of the Nation Outcome Scales“ (HoNOS) zur Erfassung des Verlaufs depressiver Symptomatik und des Schweregrads der Depression im stationären Setting.

Methode Die Stichprobe umfasste 132 depressive Patienten (F32: n=102; F33: n=30). Die HoNOS wurden mittels bivariaten Korrelationen mit der selbstbeurteilten (BDI) und fremdbeurteilten Depressivität (HAMD) verglichen. Die prädiktive Validität wurde mit linearen Regressionsanalysen untersucht.

Ergebnisse Die HoNOS differenzierten zwischen Patienten mit einer mittelgradigen versus schweren Depression (p<0,05) und korrelierten mit der Veränderung der fremdbeurteilten (r=0,25, p<0,008), jedoch nicht mit derjenigen der selbstbeurteilten Depressivität (r=0,19, p>0,008). Die HoNOS sagten die Depressivität bei Austritt nicht voraus (β=0,03, p>0,05).

Schlussfolgerung Da die HoNOS den Verlauf und Schweregrad depressiver Symptomatik nur teilweise erfassen, sollten sie nur kombiniert mit anderen depressionsspezifischen Messinstrumenten angewendet werden.

Abstract

Objectives This study investigates the assessment of change of depressive symptoms and severity of depression with the „Health of the Nation Outcome Scales“ (HoNOS) in an inpatient setting.

Method Participants were 132 adults diagnosed with depressive disorder (F32: n=102; F33: n=30). Bivariate correlations were used to determine the correlation of the HoNOS with self-reported (BDI) and observer-rated depressive symptoms (HAMD). The predictive validity of the HoNOS was analysed with linear regression models.

Results The HoNOS differentiated significantly between patients with moderate versus severe depression at baseline (p<0,05). It correlated with the HAMD change score (r=0,25, p<0,008), but not with the BDI change score (r=0,19, p>0,008).The HoNOS was not a significant predictor of observer-rated depression at discharge (β=0,03, p>0,05).

Conclusion As the HoNOS only partially seems to assess the change and severity of depressive symptoms, it should only be used in combination with depression-specific instruments.

Schlüsselwörter

Depression - Validität - HoNOS - HAMD

Key words

Depression - validity - HoNOS - HAMD
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Baumeister H, Härter M. Prevalence of mental disorders based on general population surveys. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007; 42: 537-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wittchen H-U, Jacobi F. Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe; a critical review and appraisal of 27 studies. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005; 15: 357-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wittchen H-U, Pittrow D. Prevalence, recognition and management of depression in primary care in Germany: the Depression 2000 study. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp 2002; 17: S1-S11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Baer N, Schuler D, Füglister-Dousse S. et al. Depressionen in der Schweizer Bevölkerung. Daten zur Epidemiologie, Behandlung und sozial-beruflichen Integration. In: Gesundheitsobservatorium S . ed Obsan Bericht 56. Neuchâtel: Schweizerisches Gesundheitsobservatorium; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Tomonaga Y, Haettenschwiler J, Hatzinger M. et al. The economic burden of depression in Switzerland. PharmacoEconomics 2013; 31: 237-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Katon W, Schulberg H. Epidemiology of depression in primary care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1992; 14: 237-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Stieglitz R-D, Wolfersdorf M, Metzger R. et al. Stationäre Behandlung depressiver PatientenKonzeptuelle Überlegungen und Ergebnisse eines Pilotprojekts zur Qualitätssicherung in Baden-Württemberg. Nervenarzt 1998; 69: 59-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 von Allmen U, Rössler W. Freiwilliges Benchmarking der Psychiatrischen Universitätskliniken Basel, Bern und Zürich. In: Basel (UPK): Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Becker T, Kösters M. Qualitätssicherung und psychiatrische Versorgungsforschung. In: Schneider F. (Hrsg.) Positionen der Psychiatrie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012: 203-208
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH. et al. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Research and development. Br J Psychiatry 1998; 172: 11-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bech P, Bille J, Schütze T. et al. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS): Implementability, subscale structure and responsiveness in the daily psychiatric hospital routine over the first 18 months. Nord J Psychiatry 2003; 57: 285-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lora A, Bai G, Bianchi S. et al. The Italian version of HoNOS (Health of the Nation Outcome Scales), a scale for evaluating the outcomes and the severity in mental health services. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2001; 10: 198-204
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Trauer T. The subscale structure of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). JMH 1999; 8: 499-509
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Andreas S, Harfst T, Rabung S. et al. The validity of the German version of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS-D): a clinician-rating for the differential assessment of the severity of mental disorders. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2010; 19: 50-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 ANQ. Umsetzungskonzept Psychiatrie. Nationale Messungen stationäre Psychiatrie. Indikatoren „Symptombelastung“ und „Freiheitsbeschränkende Massnahmen“. Nationaler Verein für Qualitätsentwicklung in Spitälern und Kliniken. 2012; Im Internet: http://www.anq.ch/fileadmin/redaktion/italiano/120611_Umsetzungskonzeption_DT.pdf Stand 12.01.2016
    PubMed
  • 16 Goldney RD, Fisher LJ, Walmsley SH. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales in psychiatric hospitalisation: a multicentre study examining outcome and prediction of length of stay. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1998; 32: 199-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Parker G, O'Donnell M, Hadzi-Pavlovic D. et al. Assessing outcome in community mental health patients: a comparative analysis of measures. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2002; 48: 11-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bebbington P, Brugha T, Hill T. et al. Validation of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174: 389-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ashaye KS, Shergill S, Orrell M. et al. Do the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales predict outcome in the elderly mentally ill? A 1-year follow-up study. JMH 1999; 8: 615-620
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Spear J, Chawla S, O'Reilly M. et al. Does the HoNOS 65+ meet the criteria for a clinical outcome indicator for mental health services for older people?. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002; 17: 226-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sharma V, Wilkinson G, Fear S. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: a case study in general psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174: 395-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rees A, Richards A, Shapiro DA. Utility of the HoNOS in measuring change in a community mental health care population. JMH 2004; 13: 295-304
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Amin S, Singh SP, Croudace T. et al. Evaluating the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Reliability and validity in a three-year follow-up of first-onset psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174: 399-403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Orrell M, Yard P, Handysides J. et al. Validity and reliability of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales in psychiatric patients in the community. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174: 409-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 McClelland R, Trimble P, Fox ML. et al. Validation of an outcome scale for use in adult psychiatric practice. Qual Health Care 2000; 9: 98-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hope J, Trauer T, Keks N. Reliability, validity and utility of the health of the nation outcome scale (HoNOS) in Australian adult psychiatric services. Schizophr Res 1998; 29: 9-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Page AC, Hooke GR, Rutherford EM. Measuring mental health outcomes in a private psychiatric clinic: Health of the Nation Outcome Scales and Medical Outcomes Short Form SF–36. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2001; 35: 377-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Adams AP, O'Brien JT, Crook W. et al. Health of the nation outcome scales for psychiatry: Are they valid?. JMH 2000; 9: 193-198
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Brooks R. The reliability and validity of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: validation in relation to patient derived measures. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2000; 34: 504-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Pirkis JE, Burgess PM, Kirk PK. et al. A review of the psychometric properties of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) family of measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Müller M, Vandeleur C, Weniger G. et al. The performance of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales as measures of clinical severity. Psychiatry Res 2016; 239: 20-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hamilton M. Hamilton Depression Scale: A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 23: 56-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Beck AT, Ward C, Mendelson M. Beck depression inventory (BDI). Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4: 561-571
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Cuijpers P, Li J, Hofmann SG. et al. Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2010; 30: 768-778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Joiner TE, Walker RL, Pettit JW. et al. Evidence-based assessment of depression in adults. Psychol Assessment 2005; 17: 267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Möller H. Rating depressed patients: observer-vs self-assessment. Eur Psychiatry 2000; 15: 160-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Uher R, Perlis RH, Placentino A. et al Self-report and clinician-rated measures of depression severity: can one replace the other?. Depress Anxiety 2012; 29: 1043-1049
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 WHO . Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit (ICF). Genf: WHO; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Weber A, Jaekel-Reinhard A. Burnout syndrome: a disease of modern societies?. Occ Med 2000; 50: 512-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Bianchi R, Schonfeld IS, Laurent E. Burnout–depression overlap: A review. Clin Psychol Rev 2015; 36: 28-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Hochstrasser B, Brühlmann T, Cattapan K. et al. Burnout-Behandlung Teil 1: Grundlagen. Swiss Medical Forum 2016; 16: 538-543
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hochstrasser B, Brühlmann T, Cattapan K. et al. Burnout-Behandlung Teil 2: Praktische Empfehlungen. Swiss Medical Forum 2016; 16: 561-566
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Melamed S, Shirom A, Toker S. et al. Burnout and risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence, possible causal paths, and promising research directions. Psychol Bull 2006; 132: 327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Armon G, Melamed S, Shirom A. et al. Elevated burnout predicts the onset of musculoskeletal pain among apparently healthy employees. J Occup Health 2010; 15: 399
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Ahola K, Honkonen T, Isometsä E. et al. The relationship between job-related burnout and depressive disorders—results from the Finnish Health 2000 Study. J Affect Disord 2005; 88: 55-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Ahola K, Honkonen T, Kivimäki M. et al. Contribution of burnout to the association between job strain and depression: the health 2000 study. J Occup Env Med 2006; 48: 1023-1030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Hakanen JJ, Schaufeli WB. Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective study. J Affect Disord 2012; 141: 415-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 ANQ. Manual für Erfassende Stationäre Psychiatrie Erwachsene. In: Nationale Messung der Indikatoren „Symptombelastung“ und „Freiheitsbeschränkende Massnahmen“ Nationaler Verein für Qualitätsentwicklung in Spitälern und Kliniken. 2014; Im Internet:http://www.anq.ch/fileadmin/redaktion/deutsch/20160712_Manual-EP_DE_v5_gueltig_ab_2017.pdf Stand 18.01.2016
    PubMed
  • 49 Guy W. Clinical Global Impressions (CGI). In: Guy W. (Hrsg.) ECDEU Assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1976: 218-222
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL. et al. The Global Assessment Scale: a procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976; 33: 766
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Bacon SF, Collins MJ, Plake EV. Does the Global Assessment of Functioning assess functioning?. Journal of Mental Health Counseling 2002; 24: 202
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Franke GH. SCL-90-R. Die Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis - Deutsche Version - Manual. 2. Aufl. Göttingen: Beltz; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Derogatis LR. SCL-90-R, administration, scoring & procedures manual-II for the Revised version and other instruments of the Psychopathology Rating Scale series. Townson: Clinical Psychometric Research, Inc.; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 George D, Mallery M. Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Bortz J. Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler (5., vollständig überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Barcelona, Hong Kong, London, Mailand, Paris, Singapur, Tokio: Springer; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Theodoridou A, Jaeger M, Ketteler D. et al. The concurrent validity and sensitivity of change of the German version of the health of the nation outcome scales in a psychiatric inpatient setting. Psychopathology 2011; 44: 391-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Schneibel R, Brakemeier E-L, Wilbertz G. et al. Sensitivity to detect change and the correlation of clinical factors with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory in depressed inpatients. Psychiatry Res 2012; 198: 62-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Enns MW, Larsen DK, Cox BJ. Discrepancies between self and observer ratings of depression: the relationship to demographic, clinical and personality variables. J Affect Disord 2000; 60: 33-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Domken M, Scott J, Kelly P. What factors predict discrepancies between self and observer ratings of depression?. J Affect Disord 1994; 31: 253-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Tsujii N, Akashi H, Mikawa W. et al. Discrepancy between self-and observer-rated depression severities as a predictor of vulnerability to suicide in patients with mild depression. J Affect Disord 2014; 161: 144-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Rane L, Fekadu A, Wooderson S. et al. Discrepancy between subjective and objective severity in treatment-resistant depression: prediction of treatment outcome. J Psychiatr Res 2010; 44: 1082-1087
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Sayer NA, Sackeim HA, Moeller JR. et al. The relations between observer-rating and self-report of depressive symptomatology. Psychol Assessment 1993; 5: 350
    PubMed
  • 65 Brown C, Schulberg HC, Madonia MJ. Assessment depression in primary care practice with the Beck Depression Inventory and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Psychol Assessment 1995; 7: 59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR. et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Newnham EA, Harwood KE, Page AC. The subscale structure and clinical utility of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale. JMH 2009; 18: 326-334
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1986
    Google Scholar
  • 69 Eagar K, Trauer T, Mellsop G. Performance of routine outcome measures in adult mental health care. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005; 39: 713-718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar