Semin intervent Radiol 2022; 39(03): 338-340
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1751290
Ethics Corner

Suspending Do Not Resuscitate/Do Not Intubate Orders for Image-Guided Procedures

Eric Cyphers
1   Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Sara Silberstein
2   Albany Medical College, Albany, New York
,
Eric J. Keller
3   Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
› Institutsangaben
Funding None.

Interventional radiologists (IRs) often care for critically ill patients, providing both treatment and palliation. For example, a recent study found that patients died within 30 days of 9% of inpatient image-guided procedures and within 6 months of 7% of outpatient image-guided procedures.[1] It is also not uncommon for these patients to have do not resuscitate and/or do not intubate (DNR/DNI) orders or other advance directives expressing patients' wishes to refuse resuscitation and/or intubation in the event of a cardiac arrest or the loss of a protected airway.[2] When asked to perform a procedure for these patients, IRs can face a few different ethical dilemmas: the patient may want to keep the DNR/DNI order in place for their procedure, the documented code status may conflict with patient or family preferences, or respecting such preferences in the face of a code can be disturbing for the IR and/or members of their team. This article considers each of these issues with suggestions of how to best navigate them.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
31. August 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Rockwell HD, Beeson SA, Keller EJ, Harman SM, Newton IG, Kothary N. Utilisation of goals of care discussions and palliative care prior to image-guided procedures near the end of life. Clin Radiol 2022; 77 (05) 345-351
  • 2 Berlinger N, Jennings B, Wolf SM. The Hastings Center Guidelines for Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment and Care Near the End of Life: Revised and Expanded. 2nd ed.. Oxford University Press; 2013
  • 3 Shapiro ME, Singer EA. Perioperative advance directives: do not resuscitate in the operating room. Surg Clin North Am 2019; 99 (05) 859-865
  • 4 Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD. et al; American Thoracic Society ad hoc Committee on Futile and Potentially Inappropriate Treatment, American Thoracic Society, American Association for Critical Care Nurses, American College of Chest Physicians, European Society for Intensive Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care. An official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM policy statement: responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 191 (11) 1318-1330
  • 5 American College of Surgeons. Statement on advance directives by patients: “do not resuscitate” in the operating room. Bull Am Coll Surg 2014; 99 (01) 42-43
  • 6 American Society of Anesthesiologists. Ethical Guidelines for the Anesthesia Care of Patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders or Other Directives that Limit Treatment. American Society of Anesthesiologists; 2001
  • 7 Chapple HS. No Place for Dying: Hospitals and the Ideology of Rescue. Routledge; 2016
  • 8 Waldrop DP. Denying and defying death: the culture of dying in 21st century America. Gerontologist 2011; 51 (04) 571-576
  • 9 Stegmann ME, Brandenbarg D, Reyners AKL, van Geffen WH, Hiltermann TJN, Berendsen AJ. Treatment goals and changes over time in older patients with non-curable cancer. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29 (07) 3849-3856
  • 10 Jesus JE, Allen MB, Michael GE. et al. Preferences for resuscitation and intubation among patients with do-not-resuscitate/do-not-intubate orders. Paper Presented at: Mayo Clinic Proceedings; 2013
  • 11 Perkins HS. Controlling death: the false promise of advance directives. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147 (01) 51-57
  • 12 Deep KS, Griffith CH, Wilson JF. Communication and decision making about life-sustaining treatment: examining the experiences of resident physicians and seriously-ill hospitalized patients. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23 (11) 1877-1882
  • 13 Murphy DJ, Burrows D, Santilli S. et al. The influence of the probability of survival on patients' preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med 1994; 330 (08) 545-549
  • 14 Keller EJ, Rabei R, Heller M, Kothary N. Perceptions of futility in interventional radiology: a multipractice systematic qualitative analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2021; 44 (01) 127-133
  • 15 Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ. Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine. 7th ed.. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2010
  • 16 Pauly BM, Varcoe C, Storch J. Framing the issues: moral distress in health care. HEC Forum 2012; 24 (01) 1-11
  • 17 Keller EJ. Reflect and remember: the ethics of complications in interventional radiology. Semin Intervent Radiol 2019; 36 (02) 104-107
  • 18 Wu AW. Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ 2000; 320 (7237): 726-727
  • 19 Requarth JA. Informed consent challenges in frail, delirious, demented, and do-not-resuscitate adult patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26 (11) 1647-1651