Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39(03): 171-178
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750126
Original Article

Clinical Utility of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Parameters for Evaluating Patients with Lower Limb Lymphedema after Lymphovenous Anastomosis

Woo Chul Son
1   Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Jin Geun Kwon
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Joon Pio Hong 
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Chang Sik Park
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Sang Ah Kim
1   Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Jung Hwa Do
1   Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Hwayeong Cheon
3   Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
,
Ma Nessa Gelvosa
1   Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Hyun Suk Suh
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Jae Yong Jeon 
1   Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
› Author Affiliations Funding This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2019R1A2C1009055, NRF-2019R1C1C1008451) and the World Class 300 Project (R&D) (S2382763) of the MOTIE, MSS (Korea).
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background In lymphedema, lymphatic fluid accumulates in the interstitial space, and localized swelling appears. Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) is the most widely used surgery to rebuild a damaged lymphatic system; however, assessing outcome of LVA involves performing volume measurements, which provides limited information on body composition changes. Therefore, we analyzed the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) parameters that can reflect the status of lymphedema patients who underwent LVA.

Methods We retrospectively reviewed records of 42 patients with unilateral lower extremity lymphedema who had LVA. We measured the perioperative BIA parameters such as extracellular water (ECW) ratio and volume as defined by the percentage of excess volume (PEV). We evaluated the relationship between the amount of change in PEV and in BIA parameters before and after surgery. We confirmed the correlation between ΔPEV and BIA parameters using Spearman's correlation.

Results Most patients included had secondary lymphedema due to cancer. Average age was 51.76 years and average body mass index was 23.27. PEV and all BIA parameters after surgery showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared with preoperative measurements. The ECW ratio aff/unaff showed the strongest correlation with PEV with a correlation coefficient of 0.473 (p < 0.01).

Conclusion Our findings suggest that BIA parameters, especially ECW ratio aff/unaff could reflect the status of patients with lower limb lymphedema after LVA. Appropriate use of BIA parameters may be useful in the postoperative surveillance of patients.

Keywords

lymphedema - lymphovenous anastomosis - bioelectrical impedance analysis


Publication History

Received: 19 October 2021

Accepted: 23 April 2022

Article published online:
11 July 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Miranda Garcés M, Mirapeix R, Pons G, Sadri A, Masià J. A comprehensive review of the natural lymphaticovenous communications and their role in lymphedema surgery. J Surg Oncol 2016; 113 (04) 374-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bakar Y, Tuğral A. Lower extremity lymphedema management after gynecologic cancer surgery: a review of current management strategies. Ann Vasc Surg 2017; 44: 442-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pereira N, Lee YH, Suh Y. et al. Cumulative experience in lymphovenous anastomosis for lymphedema treatment: the learning curve effect on the overall outcome. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (09) 735-741
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Mortimer PS, Rockson SG. New developments in clinical aspects of lymphatic disease. J Clin Invest 2014; 124 (03) 915-921
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Chang EI, Skoracki RJ, Chang DW. Lymphovenous anastomosis bypass surgery. Semin Plast Surg 2018; 32 (01) 22-27
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Granzow JW, Soderberg JM, Kaji AH, Dauphine C. Review of current surgical treatments for lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21 (04) 1195-1201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Scaglioni MF, Fontein DBY, Arvanitakis M, Giovanoli P. Systematic review of lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) for the treatment of lymphedema. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (08) 947-953
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Auba C, Diego MGRLBH. Lymphaticovenular anastomoses for lymphedema treatment: 18 months postoperative outcomes. Microsurgery 2009; 2008: 504-506
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mihara M, Hara H, Tange S. et al. Multisite lymphaticovenular bypass using supermicrosurgery technique for lymphedema management in lower lymphedema cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (01) 262-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Forte AJ, Huayllani MT, Boczar D. et al. Bioimpedance spectroscopy for assessment of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review. Plast Surg Nurs 2020; 40 (02) 86-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Binkley JM, Weiler MJ, Frank N, Bober L, Dixon JB, Stratford PW. Assessing arm volume in people during and after treatment for breast cancer: reliability and convergent validity of the LymphaTech System. Phys Ther 2020; 100 (03) 457-467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD. et al; Composition of the ESPEN Working Group. Bioelectrical impedance analysis–part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr 2004; 23 (05) 1226-1243
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Seward C, Skolny M, Brunelle C, Asdourian M, Salama L, Taghian AG. A comprehensive review of bioimpedance spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool for the detection and measurement of breast cancer-related lymphedema. J Surg Oncol 2016; 114 (05) 537-542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ward L, Winall A, Isenring E. et al. Assessment of bilateral limb lymphedema by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2011; 21 (02) 409-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Coroneos CJ, Wong FC, DeSnyder SM, Shaitelman SF, Schaverien MV. Correlation of L-Dex bioimpedance spectroscopy with limb volume and lymphatic function in lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol 2019; 17 (03) 301-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cho KH, Han EY, Lee SA, Park H, Lee C, Im SH. Feasibility of bioimpedance analysis to assess the outcome of complex decongestive therapy in cancer treatment-related lymphedema. Front Oncol 2020; 10 (February): 111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Yoon JA, Shin MJ, Kim JH. Indocyanine green lymphography and lymphoscintigraphy severity stage showed strong correlation in lower limb lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol 2020; 00 (00) 1-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Congress I. Executive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology 2020; 53 (01) 3-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kim M, Kim H. Accuracy of segmental multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessing whole-body and appendicular fat mass and lean soft tissue mass in frail women aged 75 years and older. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013; 67 (04) 395-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Qin ES, Bowen MJ, James SL, Chen WF. Multi-segment bioimpedance can assess patients with bilateral lymphedema. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73 (02) 328-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Yasunaga Y, Yanagisawa D, Ohata E, Matsuo K, Yuzuriha S. Bioelectrical impedance analysis of water reduction in lower-limb lymphedema by lymphaticovenular anastomosis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (04) 306-314
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yasunaga Y, Yanagisawa D, Nakajima Y. et al. Water reductive effect of lymphaticovenular anastomosis on upper-limb lymphedema: bioelectrical impedance analysis and comparison with lower-limb lymphedema. J Reconstruct Microsurg 2020; 36: 660-666
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Carl HM, Walia G, Bello R. et al. Systematic review of the surgical treatment of extremity lymphedema. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (06) 412-425
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Jung M, Jeon JY, Yun GJ, Yang S, Kwon S, Seo YJ. Reference values of bioelectrical impedance analysis for detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (44) e12945
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kim L, Jeon JY, Sung IY, Jeong SY, Do JH, Kim HJ. Prediction of treatment outcome with bioimpedance measurements in breast cancer related lymphedema patients. Ann Rehabil Med 2011; 35 (05) 687-693
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Steele ML, Janda M, Vagenas D. et al. Normative interlimb impedance ratios: implications for early diagnosis of uni- and bilateral, upper and lower limb lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol 2018; 16 (06) 559-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Smoot BJ, Wong JF, Dodd MJ. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of clinical measures of breast cancer-related lymphedema: area under the curve. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92 (04) 603-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Jensen B, Braun W, Geisler C. et al. Limitations of fat-free mass for the assessment of muscle mass in obesity. Obes Facts 2019; 12 (03) 307-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sagen A, Kåresen R, Risberg MA. Physical activity for the affected limb and arm lymphedema after breast cancer surgery. A prospective, randomized controlled trial with two years follow-up. Acta Oncol 2009; 48 (08) 1102-1110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hayes SC, Janda M, Ward LC. et al. Lymphedema following gynecological cancer: Results from a prospective, longitudinal cohort study on prevalence, incidence and risk factors. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 146 (03) 623-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lawton G, Rasque H, Ariyan S. Preservation of muscle fascia to decrease lymphedema after complete axillary and ilioinguinofemoral lymphadenectomy for melanoma. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195 (03) 339-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Caretto AA, Stefanizzi G, Fragomeni SM. et al. Lymphatic function of the lower limb after groin dissection for vulvar cancer and reconstruction with lymphatic SCIP flap. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14 (04) 1076
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J. et al; Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019; 48 (01) 16-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Yuan Z, Luo Q, Chen L, Luo Q, Zhu R. The role of radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy in chyluria. Hell J Nucl Med 2010; 13 (03) 238-240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kim K, Kim IJ, Pak K. et al. The feasibility of quantitative parameters of lymphoscintigraphy without significant dermal backflow for the evaluation of lymphedema in post-operative patients with breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47 (05) 1094-1102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar