J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2023; 84(01): 44-51
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748767
Original Article

Long-Term Clinical and Radiologic Outcome Following Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Spondylodiscitis: A Retrospective Bicenter Study

Björn Sommer
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
Timo Babbe-Pekol
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Julian Feulner
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Richard Heinrich Richter
3   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Michael Buchfelder
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Ehab Shiban
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
Stefan Sesselmann
3   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
4   Institute for Medical Engineering, OTH Technical University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden, Amberg, Germany
,
Raimund Forst
3   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Kurt Wiendieck
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
5   Department of Spine Surgery, Kliniken Dr. Erler GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
Zoom Image

Abstract

Background and Study Aims Spinal instrumentation for spondylodiskitis (SD) remains highly controversial. To date, surgical data are limited to relatively small case series with short-term follow-up data. In this study, we wanted to elucidate the biomechanical, surgical, and neurologic long-term outcomes in these patients.

Material and Methods A retrospective analysis from two German primary care hospitals over a 9-year period (2005–2014) was performed. The inclusion criteria were (1) pyogenic lumbar SD, (2) minimum follow-up of 1 year, and (3) surgical instrumentation. The clinical and radiologic outcome was assessed before surgery, at discharge, and at a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Follow-up included physical examination, laboratory results, CT and MRI scans, as well as assessment of quality of life (QoL) using short-form health survey (SF-36) inventory, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, and visual analog scale (VAS) spine score.

Results Complete data were available in 70 patients (49 males and 21 females, with an age range of 67±12.3 years) with a median follow-up of 6.6 ± 4.2 years. Follow-up data were available in 70 patients after 1 year, in 58 patients after 2 years, and in 44 patients after 6 years. Thirty-five patients underwent posterior stabilization and decompression alone and 35 patients were operated on in a two-stage 360-degree interbody fusion with decompression. Pre- and postoperative angles of the affected motion segment were 17.6 ± 10.2 and 16.1 ± 10.7 degrees in patients with posterior instrumentation only and 21.0 ± 10.2 and 18.3 ± 10.5 degrees in patients with combined anterior/posterior fusion. Vertebral body subsidence was seen in 12 and 6 cases following posterior instrumentation and 360-degree instrumentation, respectively. Nonfusion was encountered in 22 and 11 cases following posterior instrumentation and 360-degree instrumentation, respectively. The length of hospital stay was 35.0 ± 24.5 days. Surgery-associated complication rate was 18% (12/70). New neurologic symptoms occurred in 7% (5/70). Revision surgery was performed in 3% (2/70) due to screw misplacement/hardware failure and in 3% (2/70) due to intraspinal hematoma. Although patients reported a highly impaired pain deception and vitality, physical mobility was unaffected and pain disability during daily activities was moderate.

Conclusion Surgical treatment of SD with a staged surgical approach (if needed) is safe and provides very good long-term clinical and radiologic outcome.



Publication History

Received: 30 January 2021

Accepted: 15 September 2021

Article published online:
27 June 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany