Download PDF
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2021; 34(06): 439-446
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735276
Review Article

Influence of the Microbiome on Anastomotic Leak

Ashley J. Williamson
1   Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
,
John C. Alverdy
1   Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations Funding The authors have no financial disclosures significant to the work presented.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Despite advances in surgical technique and the expanded use of antibiotics, anastomotic leak remains a dreaded complication leading to increased hospital length of stay, morbidity, mortality, and cost. Data continues to grow addressing the importance of a functional and diverse colonic microbiome to ensure adequate healing. Individual pathogens, such as Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of anastomotic leak. Yet how these pathogens proliferate remains unclear. It is possible that decreased microbial diversity promotes a shift to a pathologic phenotype among the remaining microbiota which may lead to anastomotic breakdown. As the microbiome is highly influenced by diet, antibiotic use, the stress of surgery, and opioid use, these factors may be modifiable at various phases of the surgical process. A large amount of data remains unknown about the composition and behavior of the “normal” gut microbiome as compared with an altered community. Therefore, targeting the gut microbiome as a modifiable factor in anastomotic healing may represent a novel strategy for the prevention of anastomotic leak.

Keywords

microbiome - anastomotic leak - healing


Publication History

Article published online:
23 November 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR, Dixon E, Buie WD. Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2010; 251 (05) 807-818
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R. Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biol 2016; 14 (08) e1002533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cohn Jr. I, Rives JD. Antibiotic protection of colon anastomoses. Ann Surg 1955; 141 (05) 707-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 LeVeen HH, Wapnick S, Falk G. et al. Effects of prophylactic antibiotics on colonic healing. Am J Surg 1976; 131 (01) 47-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Dornfeld M, Lovely JK, Huebner M, Larson DW. Surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: a study in antibiotic duration. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60 (09) 971-978
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Yu LCH, Shih YA, Wu LL. et al. Enteric dysbiosis promotes antibiotic-resistant bacterial infection: systemic dissemination of resistant and commensal bacteria through epithelial transcytosis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2014; 307 (08) G824-G835
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lagier JC, Khelaifia S, Alou MT. et al. Culture of previously uncultured members of the human gut microbiota by culturomics. Nat Microbiol 2016; 1: 16203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 2012; 486 (7402): 207-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bassis CM. Live and diet by you gut microbiota. MBio 2019; 10 (05) e02335-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kau AL, Ahern PP, Griffin NW, Goodman AL, Gordon JI. Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system. Nature 2011; 474 (7351): 327-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ohigashi S, Sudo K, Kobayashi D, Takahashi T, Nomoto K, Onodera H. Significant changes in the intestinal environment after surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17 (09) 1657-1664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Guyton K, Alverdy JC. The gut microbiota and gastrointestinal surgery. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 14 (01) 43-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Clarke JS, Condon RE, Bartlett JG, Gorbach SL, Nichols RL, Ochi S. Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce septic complications of colon operations: results of prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study. Ann Surg 1977; 186 (03) 251-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Schardey HM, Joosten U, Finke U. et al. The prevention of anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy with local decontamination. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Ann Surg 1997; 225 (02) 172-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kiran RP, Murray AC, Chiuzan C, Estrada D, Forde K. Combined preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics significantly reduces surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and ileus after colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2015; 262 (03) 416-425 , discussion 423–425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wirth U, Rogers S, Haubensak K, Schopf S, von Ahnen T, Schardey HM. Local antibiotic decontamination to prevent anastomotic leakage short-term outcome in rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33 (01) 53-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) collaborating group. Association of mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics and anastomotic leak following left sided colorectal resection: an international, multi-centre, prospective audit. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20 (Suppl. 06) 15-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 van Praagh JB, de Goffau MC, Bakker IS, Harmsen HJ, Olinga P, Havenga K. Intestinal microbiota and anastomotic leakage of stapled colorectal anastomoses: a pilot study. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (06) 2259-2265
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lee DS, Ryu JA, Chung CR. et al. Risk factors for acquisition of multi-drug resistant bacteria in patients with anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30: 496-504
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Komen N, Slieker J, Willemsen P. et al. Polymerase chain reaction for Enterococcus faecalis in drain fluid: the first screening test for symptomatic colorectal anastomotic leakage. The appeal-study: analysis of parameters predictive for evident anastomotic leakage. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014; 29 (01) 15-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodríguez JL. et al; ANACO Study Group. Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 2015; 262 (02) 321-330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Maruvada P, Leone V, Kaplan LM, Chang EB. The human microbiome and obesity: moving beyond associations. Cell Host Microbe 2017; 22 (05) 589-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wu GD, Chen J, Hoffmann C. et al. Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science 2011; 334 (6052): 105-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Walker AW, Ince J, Duncan SH. et al. Dominant and diet-responsive groups of bacteria within the human colonic microbiota. ISME J 2011; 5 (02) 220-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN. et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 2014; 505 (7484): 559-563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Harrell L, Wang Y, Antonopoulos D. et al. Standard colonic lavage alters the natural state of mucosal-associated microbiota in the human colon. PLoS One 2012; 7 (02) 7e32545
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Gaines S, Williamson AJ, Pena R. et al. Preoperative bowel preparation decrease colonization with collagenase producing bacteria in non-obese patients. Paper presented at: Society for the Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 60th Annual Meeting; May 19, 2019; San Diego, California
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Jernberg C, Löfmark S, Edlund C, Jansson JK. Long-term ecological impacts of antibiotic administration on the human intestinal microbiota. ISME J 2007; 1 (01) 56-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Grootjans J, Hundscheid IH, Lenaerts K. et al. Ischaemia-induced mucus barrier loss and bacterial penetration are rapidly counteracted by increased goblet cell secretory activity in human and rat colon. Gut 2013; 62 (02) 250-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Li H, Limenitakis JP, Fuhrer T. et al. The outer mucus layer hosts a distinct intestinal microbial niche. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 8292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Shakhsheer BA, Versten LA, Luo JN. et al. Morphine promotes colonization of anastomotic tissues with collagenase-producing Enterococcus faecalis and causes leak. J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20 (10) 1744-1751
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Yauw STK, Arron M, Lomme RMLM. et al. Microbial glucuronidase inhibition reduce severity of diclofenac-induced anastomotic leak in rates. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2018; 19 (04) 417-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Schardey HM, Kamps T, Rau HG, Gatermann S, Baretton G, Schildberg FW. Bacteria: a major pathogenic factor for anastomotic insufficiency. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38 (11) 2564-2567
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Olivas AD, Shogan BD, Valuckaite V. et al. Intestinal tissues induce an SNP mutation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa that enhances its virulence: possible role in anastomotic leak. PLoS One 2012; 7 (08) e44326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Shogan BD, Belogortseva N, Luong PM. et al. Collagen degradation and MMP9 activation by Enterococcus faecalis contribute to intestinal anastomotic leak. Sci Transl Med 2015; 7 (286) 286ra68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Shogan BD, Smith DP, Christley S, Gilbert JA, Zaborina O, Alverdy JC. Intestinal anastomotic injury alters spatially defined microbiome composition and function. Microbiome 2014; 2: 35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Fink D, Romanowski K, Valuckaite V. et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa potentiates the lethal effect of intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury: the role of in vivo virulence activation. J Trauma 2011; 71 (06) 1575-1582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Babrowski T, Holbrook C, Moss J. et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence expression is directly activated by morphine and is capable of causing lethal gut-derived sepsis in mice during chronic morphine administration. Ann Surg 2012; 255 (02) 386-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Bachmann R, Leonard D, Delzenne N, Kartheuser A, Cani PD. Novel insight into the role of microbiota in colorectal surgery. Gut 2017; 66 (04) 738-749
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Wiegerinck M, Hyoju SK, Mao J. et al. Novel de novo synthesized phosphate carrier compound ABA-PEG20k-Pi20 suppresses collagenase production in Enterococcus faecalis and prevents colonic anastomotic leak in an experimental model. Br J Surg 2018; 105 (10) 1368-1376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 2017; 152 (03) 292-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar