Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38(05): 371-377
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1733993
Original Article

Utility of ERAS Pathway in Nonabdominal-Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: Efficacy in PAP Flap Reconstruction?

Min-Jeong Cho 
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
,
Ricardo Garza
2   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Sumeet S. Teotia
2   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Nicholas T. Haddock
2   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are effective in decreasing hospital length of stay and inpatient opioid consumption. Implementation of these protocols in abdominally based breast reconstruction has been successful. When a patient is a poor candidate for abdominally based flaps a popular secondary option is the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap. We present our experience with implementation of our ERAS protocol in patients treated with PAP flaps for breast reconstruction.

Methods Retrospective review of patients treated with autologous breast reconstruction using PAP flaps before and after ERAS implementation were performed. Patient characteristics, postoperative oral morphine equivalents (OMEs), and flap data were collected.

Results A total of 87 patients were included in this study (58 patients in pre-ERAS and 29 patients in ERAS group). There was no statistical difference in patient age, comorbidities, smoking, and radiation between two groups. The ERAS group had statistically lower hospital length of stay (2.6 vs. 3.8 days), procedure time (315 vs. 433 minutes), postoperative day 0 (54.8 vs. 96.3), postoperative day 1 (29.9 vs. 57.7), and total opioid consumption (103.7 vs. 192.1). There was no statistical difference in average pain scores between two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that procedure time significantly increased the amount of opioid consumption while ERAS implementation significantly reduced LOS and opioid consumption.

Conclusion Use of an ERAS protocol in PAP flap breast reconstruction has not been previously studied. Our work shows that ERAS implementation in PAP flap breast reconstruction significantly reduces inpatient opioid use and length of hospital stay.

Keywords

ERAS - breast reconstruction - profunda artery perforator - opioid usage - length of hospital stay - DIEP

Institutional Review Board Statement

IRB has approved this study.


Author's Contribution

M.-J.C. conceptualized the study, acquired data, performed the analyses, drafted the initial manuscript, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. N.T.H. and S.S.T. conceptualized the study, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.




Publication History

Received: 13 December 2020

Accepted: 22 June 2021

Article published online:
28 August 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 2002; 183 (06) 630-641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP. Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 2011; 149 (06) 830-840
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Nijland LMG, de Castro SMM, van Veen RN. Risk factors associated with prolonged hospital stay and readmission in patients after primary bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2020; 30 (06) 2395-2402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Suharwardy S, Carvalho B. Enhanced recovery after surgery for cesarean delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2020; 32 (02) 113-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Melnyk M, Casey RG, Black P, Koupparis AJ. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: time to change practice?. Can Urol Assoc J 2011; 5 (05) 342-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Temple-Oberle C, Shea-Budgell MA, Tan M. et al; ERAS Society. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in breast reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (05) 1056e-1071e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fayezizadeh M, Petro CC, Rosen MJ, Novitsky YW. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for abdominal wall reconstruction: pilot study and preliminary outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (4, suppl 2): 151S-159S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dumestre DO, Webb CE, Temple-Oberle C. Improved recovery experience achieved for women undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction using an enhanced recovery after Surgery Model. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (03) 550-559
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bartlett EL, Zavlin D, Friedman JD, Abdollahi A, Rappaport NH. Enhanced recovery after surgery: the plastic surgery paradigm shift. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (06) 676-685
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Schoenbrunner AR, Janis JE. Pain management in plastic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 2020; 47 (02) 191-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Astanehe A, Temple-Oberle C, Nielsen M. et al. An enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for microvascular breast reconstruction is safe and effective. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (01) e1634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sharif-Askary B, Hompe E, Broadwater G, Anolik R, Hollenbeck ST. The effect of enhanced recovery after surgery pathway implementation on abdominal-based microvascular breast reconstruction. J Surg Res 2019; 242: 276-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Batdorf NJ, Lemaine V, Lovely JK. et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery in microvascular breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (03) 395-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Afonso A, Oskar S, Tan KS. et al. Is enhanced recovery the new standard of care in microsurgical breast reconstruction?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (05) 1053-1061
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Allen RJ, Haddock NT, Ahn CY, Sadeghi A. Breast reconstruction with the profunda artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (01) 16e-23e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Haddock NT, Gassman A, Cho MJ, Teotia SS. 101 consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: lessons learned with our early experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (02) 229-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Consecutive 265 profunda artery perforator flaps: refinements, satisfaction, and functional outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (04) e2682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Allen Jr RJ, Lee ZH, Mayo JL, Levine J, Ahn C, Allen Sr RJ. The profunda artery perforator flap experience for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (05) 968-975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Svendsen K, Borchgrevink P, Fredheim O, Hamunen K, Mellbye A, Dale O. Choosing the unit of measurement counts: the use of oral morphine equivalents in studies of opioid consumption is a useful addition to defined daily doses. Palliat Med 2011; 25 (07) 725-732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Offodile II AC, Gu C, Boukovalas S. et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in breast reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 173 (01) 65-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kaoutzanis C, Ganesh Kumar N, O'Neill D. et al. Enhanced recovery pathway in microvascular autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction: should it become the standard of care?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (04) 841-851
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yan C, Wink JD, Ligh CA, Kanchwala S. The effects of adjunctive pain medications on postoperative inpatient opioid use in abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 85 (05) e3-e6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Haddock NT, Cho MJ, Teotia SS. Comparative analysis of single versus stacked free flap breast reconstruction: a single-center experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (03) 369e-377e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Cho MJ, Teotia SS, Haddock NT. Classification and management of donor-site wound complications in the profunda artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (02) 110-115
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mericli AF, McHugh T, Kruse B, DeSnyder SM, Rebello E, Offodile II AC. Time-driven activity-based costing to model cost utility of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in microvascular breast reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 230 (05) 784-794.e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar