Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 83(S 02): e126-e134
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722931
Original Article

Keyhole Endoscopic-Assisted Transcervical Approach to the Upper and Middle Retrostyloid Parapharyngeal Space: An Anatomic Feasibility Study

Aldo Eguiluz-Melendez 
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Sergio Torres-Bayona 
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
María Belen Vega
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Vanessa Hernández-Hernández
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Erik W. Wang
2   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Carl H. Snyderman
2   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Paul A. Gardner
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to describe the anatomical nuances, feasibility, limitations, and surgical exposure of the parapharyngeal space (PPS) through a novel minimally invasive keyhole endoscopic-assisted transcervical approach (MIKET).

Design Descriptive cadaveric study.

Setting Microscopic and endoscopic high-quality images were taken comparing the MIKET approach with a conventional combined transmastoid infralabyrinthine transcervical approach.

Participants Five colored latex-injected specimens (10 sides).

Main Outcome Measures Qualitative anatomical descriptions in four surgical stages; quantitative and semiquantitative evaluation of relevant landmarks.

Results A 5 cm long inverted hockey stick incision was designed to access a corridor posterior to the parotid gland after independent mobilization of nuchal and cervical muscles to expose the retrostyloid PPS. The digastric branch of the facial nerve, which runs 16.5 mm over the anteromedial part of the posterior belly of the digastric muscle before piercing the parotid fascia, was used as a landmark to identify the main trunk of the facial nerve. MIKET corridor was superior to the crossing of the accessory nerve over the internal jugular vein within 17.3 mm from the jugular process. Further exposure of the occipital condyle, vertebral artery, and the jugular bulb was achieved.

Conclusion The novel MIKET approach provides in the cadaver straightforward access to the upper and middle retrostyloid PPS through a natural corridor without injuring important neurovascular structures. Our work sets the anatomical nuances and limitations that should guide future clinical studies to prove its efficacy and safety either as a stand-alone procedure or as an adjunct to other approaches, such as the endonasal endoscopic approach.

Keywords

minimally invasive - endoscopic-assisted - transcervical approach - keyhole approach - retrostyloid parapharyngeal space

Note

Portions of this work were presented in a poster at the NASBS 28th annual meeting in Orlando, Florida, February 15-17th, 2019 and published as an abstract in the present journal.




Publication History

Received: 01 September 2020

Accepted: 03 December 2020

Article published online:
22 February 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Duek I, Sviri GE, Billan S, Gil Z. Minimally invasive surgery for resection of parapharyngeal space tumors. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79 (03) 250-256
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Liu Y, Yu H-J, Zhen H-T. Transoral and endoscope-assisted transoral approaches to resecting benign tumours of the parapharyngeal space located in the medial portion of the carotid sheaths and extending toward the skull base: our experience. J Laryngol Otol 2018; 132 (08) 748-752
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rhoton Jr AL. The anterior and middle cranial base. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (04) S273-302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Som PM, Biller HF, Lawson W, Sacher M, Lanzieri CF. Parapharyngeal space masses: an updated protocol based upon 104 cases. Radiology 1984; 153 (01) 149-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sun X, Yan B, Truong HQ, Borghei-Razavi H, Snyderman CH, Fernandez-Miranda JC. A comparative analysis of endoscopic-assisted transoral and transnasal approaches to parapharyngeal space: a cadaveric study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79 (03) 229-240
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Tanjararak K, Upadhyay S, Thiensri T. et al. Potential surgical exposure of the parapharyngeal internal carotid artery by endonasal, transoral, and transcervical approaches. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79 (03) 241-249
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Batsakis JG, Sneige N. Parapharyngeal and retropharyngeal space diseases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98 (4 Pt 1): 320-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cassoni A, Terenzi V, Della Monaca M. et al. Parapharyngeal space benign tumours: our experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42 (02) 101-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Locketz GD, Horowitz G, Abu-Ghanem S. et al. Histopathologic classification of parapharyngeal space tumors: a case series and review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273 (03) 727-734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Pensak ML, Gluckman JL, Shumrick KA. Parapharyngeal space tumors: an algorithm for evaluation and management. Laryngoscope 1994; 104 (09) 1170-1173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ducatman BS, Scheithauer BW, Piepgras DG, Reiman HM, Ilstrup DM. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. A clinicopathologic study of 120 cases. Cancer 1986; 57 (10) 2006-2021
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Papaspyrou K, Mewes T, Rossmann H. et al. Head and neck paragangliomas: Report of 175 patients (1989-2010). Head Neck 2012; 34 (05) 632-637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Koutourousiou M, Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ. et al. Endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of cranial base chordomas: outcomes and learning curve. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (03) 614-624 , discussion 624–625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Liu Q, Wang H, Zhao W. et al. Endoscopic transnasal transmaxillary approach to the upper parapharyngeal space and the skull base. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 277 (03) 801-807
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Liu JK, Sameshima T, Gottfried ON, Couldwell WT, Fukushima T. The combined transmastoid retro- and infralabyrinthine transjugular transcondylar transtubercular high cervical approach for resection of glomus jugulare tumors. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (01, Suppl 1): discussion ONS115–ONS125 ONS115-ONS125
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Luzzi S, Giotta Lucifero A, Del Maestro M. et al. Anterolateral approach for retrostyloid superior parapharyngeal space schwannomas involving the jugular foramen area: a 20-year experience. World Neurosurg 2019; 132: e40-e52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Shahinian H, Dornier C, Fisch U. Parapharyngeal space tumors: the infratemporal fossa approach. Skull Base Surg 1995; 5 (02) 73-81
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Smith PG, Sharkey DE. Experience with the resection of parapharyngeal cancers via the infratemporal fossa approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986; 94 (03) 291-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Riffat F, Dwivedi RC, Palme C, Fish B, Jani P. A systematic review of 1143 parapharyngeal space tumors reported over 20 years. Oral Oncol 2014; 50 (05) 421-430
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cohen MA, Evins AI, Lapadula G, Arko L, Stieg PE, Bernardo A. The rectus capitis lateralis and the condylar triangle: important landmarks in posterior and lateral approaches to the jugular foramen. J Neurosurg 2017; 127 (06) 1398-1406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Reisch R, Stadie A, Kockro RA, Hopf N. The keyhole concept in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 2013; 79 (2, Suppl): 17.e9-17.e13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Tayebi Meybodi A, Gandhi S, Preul MC, Lawton MT. The subatlantic triangle: gateway to early localization of the atlantoaxial vertebral artery. J Neurosurg Spine 2018; 29 (01) 18-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bailey H. The treatment of tumours of the parotid gland with special reference to total parotidectomy. BJS 1941; 28 (111) 337-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Roh J-L. Extracapsular dissection of benign parotid tumors using a retroauricular hairline incision approach. Am J Surg 2009; 197 (05) e53-e56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kim D-Y, Park GC, Cho Y-W, Choi S-H. Partial superficial parotidectomy via retroauricular hairline incision. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 7 (02) 119-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Roh J-L. Retroauricular hairline incision for removal of upper neck masses. Laryngoscope 2005; 115 (12) 2161-2166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kassam AB, Patel A, Welch W. et al. The carotid-vertebral space: an ‘extended’ lateral window to the ventromedial cranial base and lower craniocervical junction. Ear Nose Throat J 2005; 84 (05) 312-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Rhoton Jr AL. The far-lateral approach and its transcondylar, supracondylar, and paracondylar extensions. Neurosurgery 2000; 47 (3, Suppl): S195-S209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Fang Y, Wu H, Tan AD, Cheng L. Transcervical endoscopic approach for parapharyngeal space: a cadaver study and clinical practice. Acta Otolaryngol 2020; 140 (02) 163-169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kasemsiri P, Carrau RL, Ditzel Filho LFS. et al. Advantages and limitations of endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skull base. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (6, Suppl): S12-S21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kanatas AN, McCaul JA. Use of digastric branch of the facial nerve for identification of the facial nerve itself in parotidectomy: technical note. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 49 (06) 493-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Oakes WJ. Anatomic landmarks for nerves of the neck: a vade mecum for neurosurgeons. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (2, Suppl): discussion 256–260 256-260
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Lévy D, Vacher C, Lézy JP. Relations of the accessory nerve with the internal jugular vein: surgical implications in cervical lymph node clearances. Surg Radiol Anat 2001; 23 (03) 155-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 de Freitas CAF, dos Santos LRM, Santos AN, do Amaral Neto AB, Brandão LG. Anatomical study of jugular foramen in the neck. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2020; 86 (01) 44-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sheen TS, Yen KL, Ko JY, Hsu MM. Usefulness of the C1 transverse process as a reference guide in the dissection of the upper lateral neck. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122 (02) 284-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Davila VJ, Chang JM, Stone WM. et al. Current surgical management of carotid body tumors. J Vasc Surg 2016; 64 (06) 1703-1710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Sood AJ, Houlton JJ, Nguyen SA, Gillespie MB. Facial nerve monitoring during parotidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 152 (04) 631-637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Avinçsal MÖ, Hiroshima Y, Shinomiya H, Shinomiya H, Otsuki N, Nibu K-I. First bite syndrome - an 11-year experience. Auris Nasus Larynx 2017; 44 (03) 302-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Linkov G, Morris LGT, Shah JP, Kraus DH. First bite syndrome: incidence, risk factors, treatment, and outcomes. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (08) 1773-1778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar