Am J Perinatol 2022; 39(08): 878-882
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719116
Original Article

Code Blue Events in the Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Units at a Tertiary Care Children's Hospital

Catherine M. Groden
1   Neonatal–Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
,
Erwin T. Cabacungan
2   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
,
Ruby Gupta
2   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Objective The authors aim to compare all code blue events, regardless of the need for chest compressions, in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) versus the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). We hypothesize that code events in the two units differ, reflecting different disease processes.

Study Design This is a retrospective analysis of 107 code events using the code narrator, which is an electronic medical record of real-time code documentation, from April 2018 to March 2019. Events were divided into two groups, NICU and PICU. Neonatal resuscitation program algorithm was used for NICU events and a pediatric advanced life-support algorithm was used for PICU events. Events and outcomes were compared using univariate analysis. The Mann–Whitney test and linear regressions were done to compare the total code duration, time from the start of code to airway insertion, and time from airway insertion to end of code event.

Results In the PICU, there were almost four times more code blue events per month and more likely to involve patients with seizures and no chronic condition. NICU events more often involved ventilated patients and those under 2 months of age. The median code duration for NICU events was 2.5 times shorter than for PICU events (11.5 vs. 29 minutes), even when adjusted for patient characteristics. Survival to discharge was not different in the two groups.

Conclusion Our study suggests that NICU code events as compared with PICU code events are more likely to be driven by airway problems, involve patients <2 months of age, and resolve quickly once airway is taken care of. This supports the use of a ventilation-focused neonatal resuscitation program for patients in the NICU.

Key Points

  • Code blue events are four times more common in PICU.

  • NICU code events are 2.5 times shorter in duration compared with PICU events.

  • NICU code events are more likely to be attributed to a problem with an airway.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 28. Mai 2020

Angenommen: 25. September 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. November 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Ali N, Sawyer T, Barry J, Grover T, Ades A. Resuscitation practices for infants in the NICU, PICU and CICU: results of a national survey. J Perinatol 2017; 37 (02) 172-176
  • 2 Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Escobedo MB. et al. Part 13: neonatal resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2015; 132 (18, Suppl 2): S543-S560
  • 3 Kalaniti K, Schmölzer GM, McNamara PJ. Neonatal resuscitation beyond the delivery room - does one protocol fit all?. Acta Paediatr 2015; 104 (10) 971-973
  • 4 Naim MY, Burke RV, McNally BF. et al. Association of Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation with overall and neurologically favorable survival after pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the united states: a report from the cardiac arrest registry to enhance survival surveillance registry. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171 (02) 133-141
  • 5 Ahmad KA, Velasquez SG, Kohlleppel KL. et al. The characteristics and outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation within the neonatal intensive care unit based on gestational age and unit level of care. Am J Perinatol 2019
  • 6 Foglia EE, Langeveld R, Heimall L. et al. Incidence, characteristics, and survival following cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the quaternary neonatal intensive care unit. Resuscitation 2017; 110: 32-36
  • 7 Campbell ME, Byrne PJ. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and epinephrine infusion in extremely low birth weight infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2004; 24 (11) 691-695
  • 8 Chamnanvanakij S, Perlman JM. Outcome following cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the neonate requiring ventilatory assistance. Resuscitation 2000; 45 (03) 173-180
  • 9 Lantos JD, Miles SH, Silverstein MD, Stocking CB. Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in babies of very low birth weight. Is CPR futile therapy?. N Engl J Med 1988; 318 (02) 91-95
  • 10 Sood S, Giacoia GP. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in very low birthweight infants. Am J Perinatol 1992; 9 (02) 130-133
  • 11 Shah PS. Extensive cardiopulmonary resuscitation for VLBW and ELBW infants: a systematic review and meta-analyses. J Perinatol 2009; 29 (10) 655-661
  • 12 Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM. et al. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010; 122 (18, Suppl 3): S876-S908
  • 13 Mbi Ndakor S, Nelson MU, Pinheiro JMB. Counting unplanned extubations: marked variation among neonatologists. J Perinatol 2017; 37 (06) 698-701
  • 14 Morley CJ, Davis PG. Advances in neonatal resuscitation: supporting transition. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008; 93 (05) F334-F336
  • 15 Weiner GM, Zaichkin J, Kattwinkel J. American Academy of Pediatrics, American Heart Association. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation. 7th ed.. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2016