Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol 2020; 37(04): 339-345
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714728
Review Article

Percutaneous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Current Status and Future Trends

Micah M. Watts
1   Vascular Institute of Atlantic Medical Imaging, Galloway, New Jersey
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a common, safe, and effective method of treating abdominal aortic aneurysms. Traditionally treated via surgical cutdown over the common femoral arteries, many recent studies demonstrate percutaneous access techniques to avoid the surgical cutdown. Developing familiarity with these percutaneous techniques, including risks, complications, adjuncts, and alternative accesses, can help improve the outcomes and availability of EVAR. As these techniques become increasingly common, it is not unlikely that they can be practiced safely in select patients in an outpatient setting.

Keywords

percutaneous EVAR - outpatient EVAR - alternative access


Publication History

Article published online:
01 October 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

 

  • References

  • 1 Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Antoniou SA, Child E, Torella F, Antoniou GA. Percutaneous access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vascular 2016; 24 (06) 638-648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Peterson BG, Matsumura JS, Brewster DC, Makaroun MS. Excluder Bifurcated Endoprosthesis Investigators. Five-year report of a multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45 (05) 885-890
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lönn L, Larzon T, Van Den Berg JC. From puncture to closure of the common femoral artery in endovascular aortic repair. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2010; 51 (06) 791-798
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Trinidad B, Rybin D, Doros G, Eslami M, Tan TW. Factors associated with wound complications after open femoral artery exposure for elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Int J Angiol 2019; 28 (02) 124-129
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jahnke T, Schäfer JP, Charalambous N. , et al. Total percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair with the dual 6-F Perclose-AT Preclosing technique: a case-control study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20 (10) 1292-1298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cao Z, Wu W, Zhao K. , et al. Safety and efficacy of totally percutaneous access compared with open femoral exposure for endovascular aneurysm repair: a meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther 2017; 24 (02) 246-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Buck DB, Karthaus EG, Soden PA. , et al. Percutaneous versus femoral cutdown access for endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2015; 62 (01) 16-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cuypers PWM, Laheij RJF, Buth J. Which factors increase the risk of conversion to open surgery following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? The EUROSTAR collaborators. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 20 (02) 183-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lee WA, Brown MP, Nelson PR, Huber TS. Total percutaneous access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (“Preclose” technique). J Vasc Surg 2007; 45 (06) 1095-1101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jabori S, Jimenez JC, Gabriel V. , et al. Is heparin reversal required for the safe performance of percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?. Ann Vasc Surg 2013; 27 (08) 1049-1053
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hyatt E, McLaughlin JN, Shah H, Kalva SP. Transcaval approach for embolization of type II Endoleak following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. CVIR Endovasc 2019; 2 (01) 3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Schiattarella GG, Magliulo F, Laurino FI. , et al. Transradial approach for the endovascular treatment of type I endoleak after aortic aneurysm repair: a case report. BMC Surg 2013; 13 (Suppl. 02) S47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bensley RP, Hurks R, Huang Z. , et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair success is predicted by access vessel diameter. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55 (06) 1554-1561
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Krishnaswamy A, Parashar A, Agarwal S. , et al. Predicting vascular complications during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement using computed tomography: a novel area-based index. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 84 (05) 844-851
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sandgren T, Sonesson B, Ahlgren R, Länne T. The diameter of the common femoral artery in healthy human: influence of sex, age, and body size. J Vasc Surg 1999; 29 (03) 503-510
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Manunga JM, Gloviczki P, Oderich GS. , et al. Femoral artery calcification as a determinant of success for percutaneous access for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58 (05) 1208-1212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Fernandez JD, Craig JM, Garrett Jr HE, Burgar SR, Bush AJ. Endovascular management of iliac rupture during endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2009; 50 (06) 1293-1299 , discussion 1299–1300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hinchliffe RJ, Ivancev K, Sonesson B, Malina M. “Paving and cracking”: an endovascular technique to facilitate the introduction of aortic stent-grafts through stenosed iliac arteries. J Endovasc Ther 2007; 14 (05) 630-633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lucyna Z, Price P, Faries J. , et al. Shockwave lithotripsy facilitates large-bore vascular access through calcified arteries. J Vasc Surg 2019; 70 (20) e23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rosseel L, De Backer O, Søndergaard L, Bieliauskas G. Intravascular iliac artery lithotripsy to enable transfemoral thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 95 (03) E96-E99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Brodmann M, Werner M, Holden A. , et al. Primary outcomes and mechanism of action of intravascular lithotripsy in calcified, femoropopliteal lesions: results of disrupt PAD II. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 93 (02) 335-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Vatakencherry G, Molloy C, Sheth N, Liao M, Lam CK. Percutaneous access planning, techniques and considerations for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2018; 8 (Suppl. 01) S184-S190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Alvarez-Tostado JA, Moise MA, Bena JF. , et al. The brachial artery: a critical access for endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49 (02) 378-385 , discussion 385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kennedy AM, Grocott M, Schwartz MS, Modarres H, Scott M, Schon F. Median nerve injury: an underrecognised complication of brachial artery cardiac catheterisation?. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997; 63 (04) 542-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Stavroulakis K, Usai MV, Torsello G. , et al. Efficacy and safety of transbrachial access for iliac endovascular interventions. J Endovasc Ther 2016; 23 (03) 454-460
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Giordano A, Messina S, Maresca G, Biondi-Zoccai G. Hemostasis after brachial artery access with the MynxGrip device: a case report. Clin Med Insights Cardiol 2018; 12: 1179546818759298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Valsecchi O, Vassileva A, Musumeci G. , et al. Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions: anatomic considerations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67 (06) 870-878
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Stern JR, Ellozy SH. Transradial delivery of a renal snorkel during complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2017; 51 (07) 513-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Patel VG, Brayton KM, Kumbhani DJ, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. Meta-analysis of stroke after transradial versus transfemoral artery catheterization. Int J Cardiol 2013; 168 (06) 5234-5238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Fischman AM, Swinburne NC, Patel RS. A technical guide describing the use of transradial access technique for endovascular interventions. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 18 (02) 58-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kotowycz MA, Dzavík V. Radial artery patency after transradial catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5 (01) 127-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Rathore S, Stables RH, Pauriah M. , et al. Impact of length and hydrophilic coating of the introducer sheath on radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention: a randomized study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3 (05) 475-483
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Posham R, Biederman DM, Patel RS. , et al. Transradial approach for noncoronary interventions: a single-center review of safety and feasibility in the first 1,500 cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27 (02) 159-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Uflacker A, Lim S, Ragosta M. , et al. Transcaval aortic access for percutaneous thoracic aortic aneurysm repair: initial human experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26 (10) 1437-1441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Greenbaum AB, O'Neill WW, Paone G. , et al. Caval-aortic access to allow transcatheter aortic valve replacement in otherwise ineligible patients: initial human experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63 (25, Pt A): 2795-2804
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Greenbaum AB, Babaliaros VC, Chen MY. , et al. Transcaval access and closure for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective investigation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69 (05) 511-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Yeo KK, Yap J, Tan JW, Lim ST, Koh TH. Venous access closure using the Double-ProGlide Preclose technique after MitraClip implantation: long-term clinical and duplex ultrasound outcomes. J Invasive Cardiol 2016; 28 (02) 40-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Kristmundsson T, Sonesson B, Dias N, Malina M, Resch T. Anatomic suitability for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms and possible benefits of low profile delivery systems. Vascular 2014; 22 (02) 112-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Preece R, Stenson K, Shaw S. , et al. Recent developments and current controversies in short-stay endovascular aneurysm repair. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2019; 60 (04) 460-467
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Lachat ML, Pecoraro F, Mayer D. , et al. Outpatient endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: experience in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2013; 258 (05) 754-758 , discussion 758–759
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar