Novel Use of a Social-Media-Based Survey to Detect Regional Differences in Management of Monochorionic–Diamniotic Twins

Abstract

Objective This study aims to evaluate the utility of social media to distribute a patient survey on differences in management and outcomes of monochorionic–diamniotic (MCDA) pregnancies.

Study Design A cross-sectional survey was posted to an English-language MCDA twins patient-centered support group within the social media site, Facebook from April 2, 2018 to June 26, 2018. Subjects were recruited through a technique called “snowballing,” whereby individuals shared the survey to assist with recruiting. Patient reported data were analyzed using Chi-square and Kruskal–Wallis's tests to explore characteristics associated with surveillance and outcomes as related to region and provider type.

Results Over 3 months, the post “reached” 14,288 Facebook users, among which 5,653 (40%) clicked on the post. A total of 2,357 respondents with MCDA pregnancies completed the survey. Total 1,928 (82%) were from the United States (US) and 419 (18%) from other countries. Total 85% of patients had co-management with maternal–fetal medicine (MFM), more in the US compared with the rest of the world (87 vs. 74%, p < 0.01). MFM involvement led to increased adherence to biweekly ultrasounds (91 vs. 65%, p < 0.01), diagnosis of monochorionicity by 12 weeks (74 vs. 69%, p < 0.01) and better education about twin–twin transfusion syndrome (90 vs. 66%, p < 0.01). Pregnancies with MFM involvement had a higher take-home baby rate for both babies (92 vs. 89%, p < 0.01) or for at least one baby (98 vs. 93%, p < 0.01) compared with those without MFM involvement.

Conclusion A survey distributed via social media can be effective in evaluating real-life management and outcomes of an uncommon obstetrical diagnosis. This survey elucidates wide international variation in adherence to guidelines, management, and outcomes.

Keywords

Facebook - monochorionic diamniotic - social media - survey - web-based research - twins

Note

The data were presented in part at the 28th World Congress on Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology on October 20 to 24, 2018 in Singapore.

• References

• 1 Bahtiyar MO, Emery SP, Dashe JS. , et al; North American Fetal Therapy Network. The North American Fetal Therapy Network consensus statement: prenatal surveillance of uncomplicated monochorionic gestations. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (01) 118-123
• 2 Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics; Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine. Practice bulletin no. 169: multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (04) e131-e146
• 3 Management of monochorionic twin pregnancy: green-top guideline no. 51. BJOG 2017; 124 (01) e1-e45
• 4 Emery SP, Bahtiyar MO, Dashe JS. , et al. The North American Fetal Therapy Network Consensus Statement: prenatal management of uncomplicated monochorionic gestations. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (05) 1236-1243
• 5 Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A. , et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47 (02) 247-263
• 6 Simpson LL. ; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208 (01) 3-18
• 7 Altshuler AL, Gerns Storey HL, Prager SW. Exploring abortion attitudes of US adolescents and young adults using social media. Contraception 2015; 91 (03) 226-233
• 8 O'Brien Y, Martyn F, Glover LE, Wingfield MB. What women want? A scoping survey on women's knowledge, attitudes and behaviours towards ovarian reserve testing and egg freezing. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 217: 71-76
• 9 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
• 10 Muir Gray JA, Gigerenzer G. Reducing unwarranted variation in clinical practice by supporting clinicians and patients in decision making. In: Muir Gray JA, Gigerenzer G. , eds. Better Doctors, Better Patients, Better Decisions: Envisioning Health Care 2020. Cambridge MA, London: MIT Press; 2011: 45e52
• 11 Batalden M, Batalden P, Margolis P. , et al. Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Qual Saf 2016; 25 (07) 509-517
• 12 Bergman K, Sarkar P, O'Connor TG, Modi N, Glover V. Maternal stress during pregnancy predicts cognitive ability and fearfulness in infancy. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007; 46 (11) 1454-1463
• 13 Fischbein R, Nicholas L, Aultman J, Baughman K, Falletta L. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome screening and diagnosis in the United States: a triangulation design of patient experiences. PLoS ONE 2018; 13 (07) e0200087
• 14 Stagnati V, Zanardini C, Fichera A. , et al. Early prediction of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49 (05) 573-582
• 15 Khalil A, Cooper E, Townsend R, Thilaganathan B. Evolution of stage 1 twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS): systematic review and meta-analysis. Twin Res Hum Genet 2016; 19 (03) 207-216
• 16 Morton SM, Bandara DK, Robinson EM, Carr PE. In the 21st century, what is an acceptable response rate?. Aust N Z J Public Health 2012; 36 (02) 106-108
• 17 Glinianaia SV, Obeysekera MA, Sturgiss S, Bell R. Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in monochorionic and dichorionic twins: a population-based study. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (09) 2549-2557