Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2021; 34(03): 273-279
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1695739
Original Article

Multiple Ligament Knee Injuries: Does the Knee Dislocation Classification Predict the Type of Surgical Management?

Garrett T. Maxwell
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Ryan J. Warth
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Adeet Amin
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Matthew A. Darlow
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Lane Bailey
2   Ironman Sports Medicine Institute, Memorial Hermann Medical System, Houston, Texas
,
Walter R. Lowe
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
2   Ironman Sports Medicine Institute, Memorial Hermann Medical System, Houston, Texas
,
Christopher D. Harner
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
2   Ironman Sports Medicine Institute, Memorial Hermann Medical System, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate relationships among multiple ligament knee injury (MLKI) patterns as classified according to the knee dislocation (KD) classification and the types of surgical management pursued. We hypothesized that the KD classification would not be predictive of the types of surgical management, and that categorizing injuries according to additional injury features such as structure, chronicity, grade, and topographic location would be predictive of the types of surgical management. This is a Retrospective cohort study. This study was conducted at a level I trauma center with a 150-mile coverage radius. Query of our billing database was performed using combinations of 43 billing codes (International Classification of Diseases [ICD] 9, ICD-10, and Current Procedural Terminology) to identify patients from 2011 to 2015 who underwent operative management for MLKIs. There were operative or nonoperative treatment for individual ligamentous injuries, repair, or reconstruction of individual ligamentous injuries, and staging or nonstaging or nonstaging of each surgical procedure. The main outcome was the nature and timing of clinical management for specific ligamentous injury patterns. In total, 287 patients were included in this study; there were 199 males (69.3%), the mean age was 30.2 years (SD: 14.0), and the mean BMI was 28.8 kg/m2 (SD: 7.4). There were 212 injuries (73.9%) categorized as either KD-I or KD-V. The KD classification alone was not predictive of surgery timing, staging, or any type of intervention for any injured ligament (p > 0.05). Recategorization of injury patterns according to structure, chronicity, grade, and location revealed the following: partial non-ACL injuries were more frequently repaired primarily (p < 0.001), distal medial-sided injuries were more frequently treated operatively than proximal medial-sided injuries (odds ratio [OR] = 24.7; p <0.0001), and staging was more frequent for combined PCL-lateral injuries (OR = 1.3; p = 0.003) and nonavulsive fractures (OR = 1.2; p = 0.0009). The KD classification in isolation was not predictive of any surgical management strategy. Surgical management was predictable when specifying the grade and topographic location of each ligamentous injury. This is a Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Keywords

knee ligament - sports medicine - knee trauma


Publication History

Received: 06 December 2018

Accepted: 15 July 2019

Article published online:
17 March 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Cook S, Ridley TJ, McCarthy MA. et al. Surgical treatment of multiligament knee injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (10) 2983-2991
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Levy BA, Dajani KA, Whelan DB. et al. Decision making in the multiligament-injured knee: an evidence-based systematic review. Arthroscopy 2009; 25 (04) 430-438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wilson SM, Mehta N, Do HT, Ghomrawi H, Lyman S, Marx RG. Epidemiology of multiligament knee reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (09) 2603-2608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Peskun CJ, Whelan DB. Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of multiligament knee injuries: an evidence-based review. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2011; 19 (02) 167-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Werner BC, Gwathmey Jr FW, Higgins ST, Hart JM, Miller MD. Ultra-low velocity knee dislocations: patient characteristics, complications, and outcomes. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (02) 358-363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schenck Jr RC. The dislocated knee. Instr Course Lect 1994; 43: 127-136
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Wascher DC, Dvirnak PC, DeCoster TA. Knee dislocation: initial assessment and implications for treatment. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11 (07) 525-529
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Davidson J, Burkhart SS. The geometric classification of rotator cuff tears: a system linking tear pattern to treatment and prognosis. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (03) 417-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Duncan CP, Masri BA. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 1995; 44: 293-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Daniel DM, Stone ML, Dobson BE, Fithian DC, Rossman DJ, Kaufman KR. Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (05) 632-644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Frassica FJ, Sim FH, Staeheli JW, Pairolero PC. Dislocation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (263) 200-205
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sisto DJ, Warren RF. Complete knee dislocation. A follow-up study of operative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (198) 94-101
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Richter M, Kiefer H, Hehl G, Kinzl L. Primary repair for posterior cruciate ligament injuries. An eight-year followup of fifty-three patients. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (03) 298-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ríos A, Villa A, Fahandezh H, de José C, Vaquero J. Results after treatment of traumatic knee dislocations: a report of 26 cases. J Trauma 2003; 55 (03) 489-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wong CH, Tan JL, Chang HC, Khin LW, Low CO. Knee dislocations-a retrospective study comparing operative versus closed immobilization treatment outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2004; 12 (06) 540-544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Dedmond BT, Almekinders LC. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of knee dislocations: a meta-analysis. Am J Knee Surg 2001; 14 (01) 33-38
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Weiss NS. Clinical Epidemiology: The Study of the Outcome of Illness. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Fanelli GC, Sousa PL, Edson CJ. Long-term followup of surgically treated knee dislocations: stability restored, but arthritis is common. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (09) 2712-2717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 King AH, Krych AJ, Prince MR, Pareek A, Stuart MJ, Levy BA. Surgical outcomes of medial versus lateral multiligament-injured, dislocated knees. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (09) 1814-1819
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Levy NM, Krych AJ, Hevesi M. et al. Does age predict outcome after multiligament knee reconstruction for the dislocated knee? 2- to 22-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (10) 3003-3007
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Barber FA, Fanelli GC, Matthews LS, Pak SS, Woods GW. The treatment of complete posterior cruciate ligament tears. Arthroscopy 2000; 16 (07) 725-731
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Fanelli GC, Fanelli DG. Knee dislocations and PCL-based multiligament knee injuries in patients aged 18 years and younger: surgical technique and outcomes. J Knee Surg 2016; 29 (04) 269-277
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Levy BA, Boyd JL, Stuart MJ. Surgical treatment of acute and chronic anterior and posterior cruciate ligament and lateral side injuries of the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2011; 19 (02) 110-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Levy BA, Dajani KA, Morgan JA, Shah JP, Dahm DL, Stuart MJ. Repair versus reconstruction of the fibular collateral ligament and posterolateral corner in the multiligament-injured knee. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (04) 804-809
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Levy BA, Stuart MJ. Treatment of PCL, ACL, and lateral-side knee injuries: acute and chronic. J Knee Surg 2012; 25 (04) 295-305
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mariani PP, Santoriello P, Iannone S, Condello V, Adriani E. Comparison of surgical treatments for knee dislocation. Am J Knee Surg 1999; 12 (04) 214-221
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Owens BD, Neault M, Benson E, Busconi BD. Primary repair of knee dislocations: results in 25 patients (28 knees) at a mean follow-up of four years. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21 (02) 92-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Stannard JP, Nuelle CW, McGwin G, Volgas DA. Hinged external fixation in the treatment of knee dislocations: a prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (03) 184-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar