Kinematically Aligned TKA Aligns the Ankle Joint Line Closer to Those of the Native Ankle than Mechanically Aligned TKA in Bipedal Stance

Abstract

Mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (MATKA) aims to make alignment of the hip, knee, and ankle straight unexceptionally. However, emerging evidence suggests that unexceptional straightening the mechanical axis of the lower limb may lead to clinical and radiological problems of the ankle joint. By contrast, kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KATKA) strives to restore the articular surface of the prearthritic knee. In this study, we examined results from KATKA and MATKA to determine which surgery restores the ankle joint orientation closer to the native ankle joint in bipedal stance and hypothesized that KATKA, rather than MATKA, would be more effective. Data from long-leg standing radiographs of 60 healthy adults (control group, n = 120 knees), patients who underwent MATKA (n = 90 knees), and patients who underwent KATKA (n = 90 knees) were retrospectively reviewed. The hip–knee–ankle angle, orientation of the tibial plafond and the talar dome relative to the ground (G-plafond and G-talus, respectively), and orientation of the plafond relative to the mechanical axis of the limb (M-plafond and M-talus, respectively) were measured and analyzed for comparison. Results show that bipedal stance alignment in patients who underwent KATKA (G-plafond: −0.65 ± 3.03 and G-talus: −1.72 ± 4.02) were not significantly different to native ankle joint alignment indicated by the control group. Compared with the native ankle joint measured in the control group (G-plafond: −0.76 ± 2.69 and G-talus: −1.30 ± 3.25), the tibial plafond and talar dome significantly tilted laterally relative to the ground in ankle joints after MATKA (G-plafond: −2.32 ± 3.30 and G-talus: −2.97 ± 3.98, p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). Thus, postoperative ankle joint line orientation after KATKA was horizontal to the floor and closer to that of native ankle joints than those after MATKA. The level of evidence is Level III.

Keywords

knee - ankle - joint - arthroplasty

^* Jung-Taek Kim and Jun Han contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.

• References

• 1 Ji HM, Han J, Jin DS, Seo H, Won YY. Kinematically aligned TKA can align knee joint line to horizontal. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (08) 2436-2441
• 2 Kim DK, Seo MC, Song SJ, Kim KI. Are Korean patients different from other ethnic groups in total knee arthroplasty?. Knee Surg Relat Res 2015; 27 (04) 199-206
• 3 Lasam MP, Lee KJ, Chang CB, Kang YG, Kim TK. Femoral lateral bowing and varus condylar orientation are prevalent and affect axial alignment of TKA in Koreans. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (05) 1472-1483
• 4 Onodera T, Majima T, Iwasaki N, Kamishima T, Kasahara Y, Minami A. Long-term stress distribution patterns of the ankle joint in varus knee alignment assessed by computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry. Int Orthop 2012; 36 (09) 1871-1876
• 5 Güven M, Kocadal O, Akman B, Şayli U, Altıntaş F. Pedobarographic analysis in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2017; 30 (09) 951-959
• 6 Hubbard TJ, Hicks-Little C, Cordova M. Changes in ankle mechanical stability in those with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91 (01) 73-77
• 7 Muehleman C, Margulis A, Bae WC, Masuda K. Relationship between knee and ankle degeneration in a population of organ donors. BMC Med 2010; 8: 48
• 8 Reilly K, Barker K, Shamley D, Newman M, Oskrochi GR, Sandall S. The role of foot and ankle assessment of patients with lower limb osteoarthritis. Physiotherapy 2009; 95 (03) 164-169
• 9 Tallroth K, Harilainen A, Kerttula L, Sayed R. Ankle osteoarthritis is associated with knee osteoarthritis. Conclusions based on mechanical axis radiographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008; 128 (06) 555-560
• 10 Yan CH, Chiu KY, Ng FY. Total knee arthroplasty for primary knee osteoarthritis: changing pattern over the past 10 years. Hong Kong Med J 2011; 17 (01) 20-25
• 11 Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73 (05) 709-714
• 12 Gursu S, Sofu H, Verdonk P, Sahin V. Effects of total knee arthroplasty on ankle alignment in patients with varus gonarthrosis: do we sacrifice ankle to the knee?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (08) 2470-2475
• 13 Bellemans J. Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: opposes. Orthopedics 2011; 34 (09) e507-e509
• 14 Howell SM, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik KT, Hull ML. Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (10) 2271-2280
• 15 Howell SM, Howell SJ, Kuznik KT, Cohen J, Hull ML. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (03) 1000-1007
• 16 Hutt J, Massé V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA. Functional joint line obliquity after kinematic total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2016; 40 (01) 29-34
• 17 Shelton TJ, Howell SM, Hull ML. Is there a force target that predicts early patient-reported outcomes after kinematically aligned TKA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477 (05) 1200-1207
• 18 Shelton TJ, Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Hull ML. Do varus or valgus outliers have higher forces in the medial or lateral compartments than those which are in-range after a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? limb and joint line alignment after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B (10) 1319-1328
• 19 Lee JH, Jeong BO. Radiologic changes of ankle joint after total knee arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 2012; 33 (12) 1087-1092
• 20 Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86 (02) 420-428
• 21 Lee KM, Chang CB, Park MS, Kang SB, Kim TK, Chung CY. Changes of knee joint and ankle joint orientations after high tibial osteotomy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015; 23 (02) 232-238
• 22 Cho WS, Cho HS, Byun SE. Changes in hindfoot alignment after total knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritic patients with varus deformity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016
• 23 Victor JM, Bassens D, Bellemans J, Gürsu S, Dhollander AA, Verdonk PC. Constitutional varus does not affect joint line orientation in the coronal plane. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (01) 98-104
• 24 An VVG, Twiggs J, Leie M, Fritsch BA. Kinematic alignment is bone and soft tissue preserving compared to mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2019; 26 (02) 466-476
• 25 Paley D. Normal lower limb alignment and joint orientation. In: Principles of Deformity Correction. Berlin: Springer; 2003: 1-18
• 26 Paley D. Normal lower limb alignment and joint orientation. In: Principles of Deformity Correction. Springer; 2014: 1-18
• 27 Skyttä ET, Lohman M, Tallroth K, Remes V. Comparison of standard anteroposterior knee and hip-to-ankle radiographs in determining the lower limb and implant alignment after total knee arthroplasty. Scand J Surg 2009; 98 (04) 250-253
• 28 Cooke TD, Pichora D, Siu D, Scudamore RA, Bryant JT. Surgical implications of varus deformity of the knee with obliquity of joint surfaces. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71 (04) 560-565
• 29 El-Azab H, Glabgly P, Paul J, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S. Patellar height and posterior tibial slope after open- and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a radiological study on 100 patients. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (02) 323-329