J Knee Surg 2021; 34(01): 074-079
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693450
Original Article

In-Hospital Complications following Arthrotomy versus Arthroscopy for Septic Knee Arthritis: A Cohort-Matched Comparison

Yehuda E. Kerbel
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Alexander M. Lieber
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Gregory J. Kirchner
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Natalie N. Stump
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
John P. Prodromo
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Philip M. Petrucelli
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Mitesh P. Shah
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Shyam Brahmabhatt
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopedic Institute, Abington–Jefferson Health, Abington, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

There is a paucity of literature comparing the relative merits of open arthrotomy versus arthroscopy for the surgical treatment of septic knee arthritis. The primary goal of this study is to compare the risk of perioperative complications between these two surgical techniques. To this end, 560 patients treated for septic arthritis of the native knee with arthroscopy were statistically matched 1:1 with 560 patients treated with open arthrotomy. The outcome measures included major complications, minor complications, mortality, inpatient hospital charges, and length of stay (LOS). Major complications were defined as myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, postoperative shock, unplanned ventilation, deep surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, infected postoperative seroma, hospital acquired urinary tract infection, and retained surgical item. Minor complications included phlebitis and thrombophlebitis, postprocedural emphysema, minor surgical site infection, peripheral nerve complication, and intraoperative hemorrhage. Mortality data were extracted from the database using the Uniform Bill patient disposition. Complications were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, whereas mean costs and LOS were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis H-test. Major complications occurred in 3.8% of the patients in the arthroscopy cohort and 5.4% of the patients in the arthrotomy cohort (p = 0.20). Too few patients in our sample died to report based on National (Nationwide) Impatient Sample (NIS) minimum reporting standards. Rates of minor complications were similar for the arthroscopy and arthrotomy cohorts (12.5 vs. 13.9%; p = 0.48). Multivariate analysis did not reveal any greater risk of minor or major complication between the two procedures. Inpatient hospital cost was similar for arthroscopy ( = $15,917; standard deviation [SD] = 14,424) and arthrotomy ( = $16,020; SD = 18,665; p = 0.42). LOS was also similar for both arthrotomy (6.78 days, SD = 6.75) and arthroscopy (6.24 days, SD = 5.95; p = 0.23). Patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment of septic arthritis of the knee showed no difference in relative risk of perioperative complications, LOS, or hospital cost compared with patients who underwent open arthrotomy.



Publication History

Received: 03 March 2019

Accepted: 19 May 2019

Article published online:
09 July 2019

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Mathews CJ, Weston VC, Jones A, Field M, Coakley G. Bacterial septic arthritis in adults. Lancet 2010; 375 (9717): 846-855
  • 2 Morgan DS, Fisher D, Merianos A, Currie BJ. An 18 year clinical review of septic arthritis from tropical Australia. Epidemiol Infect 1996; 117 (03) 423-428
  • 3 Sharp JT, Lidsky MD, Duffy J, Duncan MW. Infectious arthritis. Arch Intern Med 1979; 139 (10) 1125-1130
  • 4 Shirtliff ME, Mader JT. Acute septic arthritis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002; 15 (04) 527-544
  • 5 Singh JA, Yu S. The burden of septic arthritis on the U.S. inpatient care: A national study. PLoS One 2017; 12 (08) e0182577
  • 6 Kaandorp CJ, Van Schaardenburg D, Krijnen P, Habbema JD, van de Laar MA. Risk factors for septic arthritis in patients with joint disease. A prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38 (12) 1819-1825
  • 7 Mathews CJ, Kingsley G, Field M. et al. Management of septic arthritis: a systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66 (04) 440-445
  • 8 Wirtz DC, Marth M, Miltner O, Schneider U, Zilkens KW. Septic arthritis of the knee in adults: treatment by arthroscopy or arthrotomy. Int Orthop 2001; 25 (04) 239-241
  • 9 Peres LR, Marchitto RO, Pereira GS, Yoshino FS, de Castro Fernandes M, Matsumoto MH. Arthrotomy versus arthroscopy in the treatment of septic arthritis of the knee in adults: a randomized clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (10) 3155-3162
  • 10 Böhler C, Dragana M, Puchner S, Windhager R, Holinka J. Treatment of septic arthritis of the knee: a comparison between arthroscopy and arthrotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (10) 3147-3154
  • 11 Dave OH, Patel KA, Andersen CR, Carmichael KD. Surgical procedures needed to eradicate infection in knee septic arthritis. Orthopedics 2016; 39 (01) 50-54
  • 12 Flanagan CD, Rascoe AS, Wang DM, Vallier HA. Revenue for initial orthopaedic trauma care: effects of patient and injury characteristics. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32 (09) 433-438
  • 13 BLS Data Viewer. Accessed January 16, 2019 at: https://beta.bls.gov/dataViewer/view/timeseries/CUUR0000SAM1
  • 14 Requirements for Publishing Results with HCUP Data. Accessed April 17, 2019 at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/publishing.jsp
  • 15 Chuang YC, Wang JL, Chen YC, Chang SC. Characteristics and outcomes of community-onset septic arthritis in adults. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2009; 42 (03) 258-264
  • 16 Sreenivas T, Nataraj AR, Menon J. Acute hematogenous septic arthritis of the knee in adults. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2013; 23 (07) 803-807
  • 17 Odum SM, Van Doren BA, Anderson RB, Davis WH. In-hospital complications following ankle arthrodesis versus ankle arthroplasty: a matched cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (17) 1469-1475
  • 18 Saifi C, Fein AW, Cazzulino A. et al. Trends in resource utilization and rate of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion throughout the United States from 2006 to 2013. Spine J 2018; 18 (06) 1022-1029
  • 19 Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, Delamarter RB. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine 2012; 37 (01) 67-76
  • 20 Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H, Schmier JK, Parvizi J. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (8, Suppl): 61-5.e1
  • 21 Lieber AM, Kirchner GJ, Kerbel YE, Khalsa AS. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement fails to reduce overall postoperative complications in fusion surgery. Spine J 2019; 19 (02) 212-217
  • 22 Aïm F, Delambre J, Bauer T, Hardy P. Efficacy of arthroscopic treatment for resolving infection in septic arthritis of native joints. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015; 101 (01) 61-64
  • 23 Thiery JA. Arthroscopic drainage in septic arthritides of the knee: a multicenter study. Arthroscopy 1989; 5 (01) 65-69
  • 24 Silva Jr. JM, Barros MA, Chahda MA, Santos IM, Marubayashi LY, Malbouisson LM. Risk factors for perioperative complications in endoscopic surgery with irrigation. Braz J Anesthesiol 2013; 63 (04) 327-333
  • 25 Bovonratwet P, Nelson SJ, Bellamkonda K. et al. Similar 30-day complications for septic knee arthritis treated with arthrotomy or arthroscopy: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis. Arthroscopy 2018; 34 (01) 213-219