The Ultimate Skull Base Maneuver Does Not Involve Removing Bone: Quantifying the Benefits of the Interfascial Dissection

Abstract

Introduction Several adjunctive osteal skull base maneuvers have been proposed to increase surgical exposure of the anterolateral approach. However, one of the easiest methods does not involve bone: the interfascial temporalis muscle dissection.

Methods Sequential dissections were performed bilaterally on five fixed silicone-injected cadaver heads. The amount of sphenoid drilling, scalp retraction, and brain retraction was standardized in all specimens. For each approach, surgical angles were measured for four deep targets: the tip of the anterior clinoid process, the internal carotid artery terminus, the origin of the posterior communicating artery, and the anterior communicating artery. Five surgical angles were measured for each target.

Results There were increases on the order of 20% in the anteroposterior (AP)-mid, AP–lateral, and mediolateral–anterior angles for all deep targets with interfascial approach versus a myocutaneous flap. An orbitozygomatic osteotomy additionally increased almost all the angles, but incrementally less so.

Conclusion An interfascial dissection increases the surgical exposure to a larger degree than additional osteotomies for several surgically relevant working angles. The addition of an orbitozygomatic osteotomy affords a particular benefit for the suprachiasmatic region. Increased adoption of interfascial mobilization or the temporalis muscle—an easily performed and low-risk maneuver—during anterolateral craniotomies may obviate the need for more involved skull base drilling.

Keywords

anterolateral approach - pterional - interfascial - frontotemporal–orbitozygomatic - orbitozygomatic - skull base

• References

• 1 Hakuba A, Tanaka K, Suzuki T, Nishimura S. A combined orbitozygomatic infratemporal epidural and subdural approach for lesions involving the entire cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 1989; 71 (5 Pt 1): 699-704
• 2 Pellerin P, Lesoin F, Dhellemmes P, Donazzan M, Jomin M. Usefulness of the orbitofrontomalar approach associated with bone reconstruction for frontotemporosphenoid meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1984; 15 (05) 715-718
• 3 Yaşargil MG, Reichman MV, Kubik S. Preservation of the frontotemporal branch of the facial nerve using the interfascial temporalis flap for pterional craniotomy. Technical article. J Neurosurg 1987; 67 (03) 463-466
• 4 Alaywan M, Sindou M. Fronto-temporal approach with orbito-zygomatic removal. Surgical anatomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1990; 104 (3-4): 79-83
• 5 D'Ambrosio AL, Mocco J, Hankinson TC, Bruce JN, van Loveren HR. Quantification of the frontotemporal orbitozygomatic approach using a three-dimensional visualization and modeling application. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (03) (Suppl. 01) 251-260 , discussion 260–261
• 6 Dzierzanowski J, Słoniewski P, Rut M. Morphometry of the pterional and pterional-orbitozygomatic approaches to the basilar artery bifurcation by the use of neuronavigation systems: a new technical concept. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2008; 67 (04) 267-272
• 7 Figueiredo EG, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM. , et al. Quantitative anatomic study of three surgical approaches to the anterior communicating artery complex. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (2, Suppl): 397-405 , discussion 397–405
• 8 Gonzalez LF, Crawford NR, Horgan MA, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Working area and angle of attack in three cranial base approaches: pterional, orbitozygomatic, and maxillary extension of the orbitozygomatic approach. Neurosurgery 2002; 50 (03) 550-555 , discussion 555–557
• 9 Honeybul S, Neil-Dwyer G, Lees PD, Evans BT, Lang DA. The orbitozygomatic infratemporal fossa approach: a quantitative anatomical study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1996; 138 (03) 255-264
• 10 Kurbanov A, Sanders-Taylor C, Keller JT, Andaluz N, Zuccarello M. The extended transorbital craniotomy: an anatomic study. Neurosurgery 2015; 11 (Suppl. 02) 338-344 , discussion 344
• 11 Nanda A, Vannemreddy PS, Vincent DA. Microsurgical and endoscopic approaches to the basilar bifurcation: quantitative comparison of combined pterional/anterior temporal and orbitozygomatic extended approaches. Skull Base 2001; 11 (02) 93-97
• 12 Schwartz MS, Anderson GJ, Horgan MA, Kellogg JX, McMenomey SO, Delashaw Jr JB. Quantification of increased exposure resulting from orbital rim and orbitozygomatic osteotomy via the frontotemporal transsylvian approach. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (06) 1020-1026
• 13 Sindou M, Alaywan M. [Orbital and/or zygomatic removal in an approach to lesions near the cranial base. Surgical technic, anatomic study and analysis of a series of 24 cases]. Neurochirurgie 1990; 36 (04) 225-233
• 14 Wong JH, Tymianski R, Radovanovic I, Tymianski M. Minimally invasive microsurgery for cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 2015; 46 (09) 2699-2706
• 15 Yasargil MG. Microneurosurgery. Vol IV. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1984
• 16 Seoane E, Tedeschi H, de Oliveira E, Wen HT, Rhoton Jr AL. The pretemporal transcavernous approach to the interpeduncular and prepontine cisterns: microsurgical anatomy and technique application. Neurosurgery 2000; 46 (04) 891-898 , discussion 898–899
• 17 Krisht AF. Transcavernous approach to diseases of the anterior upper third of the posterior fossa. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (02) E2