Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35(07): 485-488
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1679882
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Anterolateral Thigh Flap in a Chicken Model: A Novel Perforator Training Model

Alfio Luca Costa   #
1   Department of Human Pathology of the Adult, the Child and the Adolescent, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
,
Filippo Cucinotta   #
2   Department of Engineering, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
,
Antonina Fazio
1   Department of Human Pathology of the Adult, the Child and the Adolescent, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
,
Gabriele Delia
1   Department of Human Pathology of the Adult, the Child and the Adolescent, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
,
Mariarosaria Galeano
1   Department of Human Pathology of the Adult, the Child and the Adolescent, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
,
Francesco Stagno d'Alcontres
1   Department of Human Pathology of the Adult, the Child and the Adolescent, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
,
Bruno Battiston
3   Department of Traumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
,
Pierluigi Tos
4   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology for Hand, ASST Gaetano Pini, Milan, Italy
,
Alexandru Georgescu
5   Department of Plastic Surgery, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Rehabilitation Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
,
Michele Rosario Colonna
1   Department of Human Pathology of the Adult, the Child and the Adolescent, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

05 July 2018

14 January 2019

Publication Date:
22 February 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Preclinical training in perforator flap harvesting is typically conducted on living animal models; however, repeated training is not possible with these models because of ethical and/or economical constraints. We describe an anterolateral thigh flap (ALT flap) training model using chicken thigh that seems to be an appropriate training model prior, for example, to raise a perforator flap in a living rat or swine model.

Methods A total of 10 chicken legs were used in this study. Six chicken legs were anatomically dissected to confirm the presence of the perforator and to identify the main vascular tree. In four chicken legs, a skin flap was planned based on the perforator and intramuscular dissection was performed under magnification.

Results The perforator was identified in all dissections and was consistently found 3 cm above the line extending from the patella to the head of the femur in its third proximal. Proximally, the mean diameter of the artery and vein was 0.56 (σ = 0.04) and 0.84 (σ = 0.06) mm, respectively. The mean dissection time to raise the flap was 88 (σ = 7) min.

Conclusion This is the first description of a nonliving biological simulation model for training in perforator flap dissection that mimics an ALT flap. As an ex vivo chicken model, it is a cost effective and readily accessible model suitable for repeated practice.

Keywords

perforator flap - chicken - training - ALT

# indicates equal author contribution.


 

  • References

  • 1 Blondeel PN, Morris SF, Hallock GG, Neligan P. Perforator Flaps: Anatomy, Technique and Clinical Applications. 1st ed. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2006: 1042
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Seaber AV. Laboratory design in preparing for elective microvascular surgery. Hand Clin 1985; 1 (02) 233-245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ilie VG, Ilie VI, Dobreanu C, Ghetu N, Luchian S, Pieptu D. Training of microsurgical skills on nonliving models. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (07) 571-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Blondeel PN. Technical aspects of perforator dissection. In: Blondeel PN, Morris SF, Hallock GG, Neligan PC. , eds. Perforator Flaps: Anatomy, Technique & Clinical Applications. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishers; 2013: 137-138
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Grinsell DG, McCoubrey GW, Finkemeyer JP. The deep inferior epigastric perforator learning curve in the current era. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (01) 72-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hallock GG. Is there a “learning curve” for muscle perforator flaps?. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60 (02) 146-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ha Y, Song SH, Kang NH, Oh SH. Proper choice of vessels for supermicrosurgery training: an experimental animal study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (09) 742-748
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bas CE, Cwykiel J, Siemionow M. A new supermicrosurgery training model of saphenous artery and great saphenous vein anastomosis for development of advanced microsurgical skills. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (06) 426-434
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Trignano E, Fallico N, Zingone G, Dessy LA, Campus GV. Microsurgical Training with the Three-Step Approach. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (02) 87-91
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 MacIntyre IMC, Munro A. Simulation in surgical training. BMJ 1990; 300 (6732): 1088-1089
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mei J, Yin Z, Zhang J. , et al. A mini pig model for visualization of perforator flap by using angiography and MIMICS. Surg Radiol Anat 2010; 32 (05) 477-484
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kayano S, Nakagawa M, Nagamatsu S, Koizumi T, Akazawa S. Why not perforator flap training models in rats?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (02) e134-e135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hallock GG, Rice DC. Cranial epigastric perforator flap: a rat model of a true perforator flap. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 50 (04) 393-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rodríguez A, Alvarez A, Aguirrezabalaga J, Martelo F. The anteromedial thigh flap as a training model of a perforator flap in rat. J Reconstr Microsurg 2007; 23 (05) 251-255
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Nistor A, Jiga L, Georgescu D. , et al. Abstract 39: the pig as an ideal training model for perforator flap dissection in living tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (3, Suppl): 49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ardelean F, Chiroiu B, Georgescu A, Petcu S, Papuc I, Lacătuş R. Perforator flap in pig experimental study with applications in reconstructive surgery. Cluj Vet J 2009; 15 (01) 57-62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Fanua SP, Kim J, Shaw Wilgis EF. Alternative model for teaching microsurgery. Microsurgery 2001; 21 (08) 379-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Russell WMS, Burch RL. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London: Methuen; 1959
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Lannon DA, Atkins JA, Butler PE. Non-vital, prosthetic, and virtual reality models of microsurgical training. Microsurgery 2001; 21 (08) 389-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Couceiro J, Ozyurekoglu T, Sanders S, Tien H. Microsurgical training regimen with nonliving chicken models. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (03) 251-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hino A. Training in microvascular surgery using a chicken wing artery. Neurosurgery 2003; 52 (06) 1495-1497 , discussion 1497–1498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Funatsu MK, Esteban D, Junior AH, Hoyos MB. New training model for reconstructive microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (02) 692-694
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cifuentes IJ, Yañez RA, Salisbury MC, Rodriguez JR, Varas JE, Dagnino BL. A novel perforator flap training model using a chicken leg. J Hand Microsurg 2016; 8 (01) 17-20
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kiran G, Murali A. Automatic rectification of perspective distortion from a single image using plane homography. Int J Comput Sci Appl 2013; 3 (05) 47-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Phoon AF, Gumley GJ, Rtshiladze MA. Microsurgical training using a pulsatile membrane pump and chicken thigh: a new, realistic, practical, nonliving educational model. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (05) 278e-279e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Schoffl H, Hager D, Hinterdorfer C. , et al. Pulsatile perfused porcine coronary arteries for microvascular training. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 57 (02) 213-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hong JP. The use of supermicrosurgery in lower extremity reconstruction: the next step in evolution. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (01) 230-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hong JP, Koshima I. Using perforators as recipient vessels (supermicrosurgery) for free flap reconstruction of the knee region. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 64 (03) 291-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar