Comparison of Outcomes in Oncoplastic Pelvic Reconstruction with VRAM versus Omental Flaps: A Large Cohort Analysis

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study is to describe our experience and outcomes in oncoplastic pelvic reconstruction for patients who underwent either vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (VRAM) or omental flap following abdominoperineal resection (APR) at a single tertiary care institution.

Methods All patients who underwent pelvic reconstruction following APR with either VRAM or omental flaps from January 1992 to January 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics and relevant comorbidities including chemotherapy and radiation therapy data were collected and analyzed. In addition, margin status at the time of oncologic resection was analyzed. Flap-specific data were collected for each approach. Oncologic data collected included cancer type, stage at time of APR, and rate of tumor recurrence within the flap.

Results A total of 562 patients were identified who underwent pelvic reconstruction with either VRAM or omental pedicle flaps. Of these, 274 (48.8%) underwent VRAM reconstruction and 288 (51.2%) underwent omental flap reconstruction. All margins were negative at time of cancer ablation surgery. Complications data included: seroma (VRAM = 2 [0.36%]; omentum = 32 [5.69%], p < 0.0001), wound dehiscence (VRAM = 31 [5.52%]; omentum = 17 [3.02%], p = 0.022), abscess (VRAM = 4 [0.71%]; omentum = 27 [4.8%], p < 0.0001), cellulitis (VRAM = 2 [0.36%]; omentum = 10 [1.78%], p = 0.025). Statistical comparison of tumor recurrence between these two reconstructive approaches showed a significantly higher recurrence rate in omental flaps compared with VRAM flaps (p = 0.000127).

Conclusion The results of this study suggest a significantly higher tumor recurrence rate in omental flap pelvic reconstruction compared with VRAM flaps. This knowledge has the potential to influence surgical planning and flap selection in pelvic reconstruction.

Keywords

pelvic reconstruction - VRAM - omentum

• References

• 1 Speicher PJ, Turley RS, Sloane JL, Mantyh CR, Migaly J. Pelvic exenteration for the treatment of locally advanced colorectal and bladder malignancies in the modern era. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18 (04) 782-788
• 2 Howell AM, Jarral OA, Faiz O, Ziprin P, Darzi A, Zacharakis E. How should perineal wounds be closed following abdominoperineal resection in patients post radiotherapy--primary closure or flap repair? Best evidence topic (BET). Int J Surg 2013; 11 (07) 514-517
• 3 Jurado M, Bazán A, Elejabeitia J, Paloma V, Martínez-Monge R, Alcázar JL. Primary vaginal and pelvic floor reconstruction at the time of pelvic exenteration: a study of morbidity. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 77 (02) 293-297
• 4 D'Souza DN, Pera M, Nelson H, Finical SJ, Tran NV. Vaginal reconstruction following resection of primary locally advanced and recurrent colorectal malignancies. Arch Surg 2003; 138 (12) 1340-1343
• 5 Soper JT, Secord AA, Havrilesky LJ, Berchuck A, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparison of gracilis and rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap neovaginal reconstruction performed during radical pelvic surgery: flap-specific morbidity. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007; 17 (01) 298-303
• 6 Butler CE, Gündeslioglu AO, Rodriguez-Bigas MA. Outcomes of immediate vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206 (04) 694-703
• 7 Nelson RA, Butler CE. Surgical outcomes of VRAM versus thigh flaps for immediate reconstruction of pelvic and perineal cancer resection defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (01) 175-183
• 8 Campbell CA, Butler CE. Use of adjuvant techniques improves surgical outcomes of complex vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstructions of pelvic cancer defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (02) 447-458
• 9 Creagh TA, Dixon L, Frizelle FA. Reconstruction with Vertical Rectus Abdominus Myocutaneous flap in advanced pelvic malignancy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (06) 791-797
• 10 Espinosa-de-Los-Monteros A, Arista-de la Torre L, Vergara-Fernandez O, Salgado-Nesme N. Contralateral component separation technique for abdominal wall closure in patients undergoing vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap transposition for pelvic exenteration reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 77 (01) 90-92
• 11 Lefevre JH, Parc Y, Kernéis S. , et al. Abdomino-perineal resection for anal cancer: impact of a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneus flap on survival, recurrence, morbidity, and wound healing. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (05) 707-711
• 12 Buchel EW, Finical S, Johnson C. Pelvic reconstruction using vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52 (01) 22-26
• 13 Butler CE, Rodriguez-Bigas MA. Pelvic reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection: is it worthwhile?. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12 (02) 91-94
• 14 Chessin DB, Hartley J, Cohen AM. , et al. Rectus flap reconstruction decreases perineal wound complications after pelvic chemoradiation and surgery: a cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12 (02) 104-110
• 15 Khoo AK, Skibber JM, Nabawi AS. , et al. Indications for immediate tissue transfer for soft tissue reconstruction in visceral pelvic surgery. Surgery 2001; 130 (03) 463-469
• 16 Pawlik TM, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA. Pelvic exenteration for advanced pelvic malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13 (05) 612-623
• 17 Mazzaferro D, Song P, Massand S, Mirmanesh M, Jaiswal R, Pu LLQ. The omental free flap-a review of usage and physiology. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (03) 151-169