Recognition and Management of Colonic Perforation following Endoscopy

Abstract

Although rare, perforation can be a devastating complication of colonoscopy. Incidence ranges from 0.012 to 0.65% during diagnostic procedures and is higher in therapeutic procedures. Early diagnosis and management are of paramount importance to decrease morbidity. Diagnostic imaging after colonoscopy can reveal extraintestinal air, but overall clinical status including leukocytosis, fever, pain, and peritonitis is equally important to determine management. With the expanding availability of complex endoscopic interventions, an increasing number of perforations are recognized during colonoscopy or immediately afterward based on high degree of suspicion. Colonoscopic management of these early perforations may be feasible and avoid the morbidity of surgery. Patients who require surgery may be managed with laparoscopic or open surgical techniques. Surgical management may consist of primary repair of the injury, resection with anastomosis, or resection with ostomy. Mechanical bowel preparation before endoscopy decreases fecal contamination after perforation, often obviating the need for ostomy creation.

Keywords

colonoscopy - perforation - colon perforation

• References

• 1 Shi X, Shan Y, Yu E. , et al. Lower rate of colonoscopic perforation: 110,785 patients of colonoscopy performed by colorectal surgeons in a large teaching hospital in China. Surg Endosc 2014; 28 (08) 2309-2316
• 2 Damore II LJ, Rantis PC, Vernava III AM, Longo WE. Colonoscopic perforations. Etiology, diagnosis, and management. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39 (11) 1308-1314
• 3 Jentschura D, Raute M, Winter J, Henkel T, Kraus M, Manegold BC. Complications in endoscopy of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Therapy and prognosis. Surg Endosc 1994; 8 (06) 672-676
• 4 Nelson RL, Abcarian H, Prasad ML. Iatrogenic perforation of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1982; 25 (04) 305-308
• 5 Crispin A, Birkner B, Munte A, Nusko G, Mansmann U. Process quality and incidence of acute complications in a series of more than 230,000 outpatient colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2009; 41 (12) 1018-1025
• 6 Rutter M, Chilton A. Quality Assurance Guidelines for Colonoscopy. Vol. 6. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes. Sheffield, UK: NHS BCSP Publication; 2011: 24
• 7 Quallick MR, Brown WR. Rectal perforation during colonoscopic retroflexion: a large, prospective experience in an academic center. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69 (04) 960-963
• 8 Adeyemo A, Bannazadeh M, Riggs T, Shellnut J, Barkel D, Wasvary H. Does sedation type affect colonoscopy perforation rates?. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57 (01) 110-114
• 9 Lee SH, Kim KJ, Yang DH. , et al. Postpolypectomy fever, a rare adverse event of polypectomy: nested case-control study. Clin Endosc 2014; 47 (03) 236-241
• 10 Raju GS, Pham B, Xiao SY, Brining D, Ahmed I. A pilot study of endoscopic closure of colonic perforations with endoclips in a swine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62 (05) 791-795
• 11 Kim JS, Kim BW, Kim JI. , et al. Endoscopic clip closure versus surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colon perforations developed during diagnostic colonoscopy: a review of 115,285 patients. Surg Endosc 2013; 27 (02) 501-504
• 12 An SB, Shin DW, Kim JY, Park SG, Lee BH, Kim JW. Decision-making in the management of colonoscopic perforation: a multicentre retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (07) 2914-2921
• 13 Magdeburg R, Collet P, Post S, Kaehler G. Endoclipping of iatrogenic colonic perforation to avoid surgery. Surg Endosc 2008; 22 (06) 1500-1504
• 14 Yang DH, Byeon JS, Lee KH. , et al. Is endoscopic closure with clips effective for both diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy-associated bowel perforation?. Surg Endosc 2010; 24 (05) 1177-1185
• 15 Chan WK, Roslani AC, Law CW, Goh KL, Mahadeva S. Clinical outcomes and direct costings of endoluminal clipping compared to surgery in the management of iatrogenic colonic perforation. J Dig Dis 2013; 14 (12) 670-675
• 16 Schurr MO, Hartmann C, Ho CN, Fleisch C, Kirschniak A. An over-the-scope clip (OTSC) system for closure of iatrogenic colon perforations: results of an experimental survival study in pigs. Endoscopy 2008; 40 (07) 584-588
• 17 von Renteln D, Schmidt A, Vassiliou MC, Rudolph HU, Gieselmann M, Caca K. Endoscopic closure of large colonic perforations using an over-the-scope clip: a randomized controlled porcine study. Endoscopy 2009; 41 (06) 481-486
• 18 Khater S, Rahmi G, Perrod G. , et al. Over-the-scope clip (OTSC) reduces surgery rate in the management of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5 (05) E389-E394
• 19 Voermans RP, Le Moine O, von Renteln D. , et al; CLIPPER Study Group. Efficacy of endoscopic closure of acute perforations of the gastrointestinal tract. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10 (06) 603-608
• 20 Kantsevoy SV, Bitner M, Hajiyeva G. , et al. Endoscopic management of colonic perforations: clips versus suturing closure (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84 (03) 487-493
• 21 Carpio G, Albu E, Gumbs MA, Gerst PH. Management of colonic perforation after colonoscopy. Report of three cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32 (07) 624-626
• 22 Farley DR, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Pemberton JH, Ilstrup DM, Larson DR. Management of colonoscopic perforations. Mayo Clin Proc 1997; 72 (08) 729-733
• 23 Araghizadeh FY, Timmcke AE, Opelka FG, Hicks TC, Beck DE. Colonoscopic perforations. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44 (05) 713-716
• 24 Shin DK, Shin SY, Park CY. , et al. Optimal methods for the management of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforation. Clin Endosc 2016; 49 (03) 282-288
• 25 Won DY, Lee IK, Lee YS. , et al. The indications for nonsurgical management in patients with colorectal perforation after colonoscopy. Am Surg 2012; 78 (05) 550-554
• 26 Castellví J, Pi F, Sueiras A. , et al. Colonoscopic perforation: useful parameters for early diagnosis and conservative treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26 (09) 1183-1190
• 27 Bleier JI, Moon V, Feingold D. , et al. Initial repair of iatrogenic colon perforation using laparoscopic methods. Surg Endosc 2008; 22 (03) 646-649
• 28 Martínez-Pérez A, de'Angelis N, Brunetti F. , et al. Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg 2017; 12: 8-017
• 29 Orsoni P, Berdah S, Verrier C. , et al. Colonic perforation due to colonoscopy: a retrospective study of 48 cases. Endoscopy 1997; 29 (03) 160-164
• 30 Hansen AJ, Tessier DJ, Anderson ML, Schlinkert RT. Laparoscopic repair of colonoscopic perforations: indications and guidelines. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11 (05) 655-659
• 31 Demetriades D, Murray JA, Chan L. , et al; Committee on Multicenter Clinical Trials. American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Penetrating colon injuries requiring resection: diversion or primary anastomosis? An AAST prospective multicenter study. J Trauma 2001; 50 (05) 765-775
• 32 Abbas S. Resection and primary anastomosis in acute complicated diverticulitis, a systematic review of the literature. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007; 22 (04) 351-357
• 33 Gawlick U, Nirula R. Resection and primary anastomosis with proximal diversion instead of Hartmann's: evolving the management of diverticulitis using NSQIP data. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 72 (04) 807-814 , quiz 1124
• 34 Oberkofler CE, Rickenbacher A, Raptis DA. , et al. A multicenter randomized clinical trial of primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for perforated left colonic diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis. Ann Surg 2012; 256 (05) 819-826 , discussion 826–827
• 35 Tadlock MD, Karamanos E, Skiada D. , et al. Emergency surgery for acute diverticulitis: which operation? A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013; 74 (06) 1385-1391 , quiz 1610
• 36 Bridoux V, Regimbeau JM, Ouaissi M. , et al. Hartmann's procedure or primary anastomosis for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis: a prospective multicenter randomized trial (DIVERTI). J Am Coll Surg 2017; 225 (06) 798-805