Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2019; 36(05): 530-536
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669947
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Identification of a Pivotal Period in the Oral Feeding Progression of Preterm Infants

Sandra Fucile
1   Department of Paediatrics/Neonatology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
2   School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
,
Sarah Phillips
1   Department of Paediatrics/Neonatology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
,
Kelly Bishop
2   School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
,
Meagan Jackson
2   School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
,
Taylor Yuzdepski
2   School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
,
Kimberly Dow
1   Department of Paediatrics/Neonatology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

24 January 2018

02 August 2018

Publication Date:
12 September 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective Preterm infants are at risk of encountering oral feeding difficulties which impede on the transition to independent oral feeds. The objective of this study was to identify a pivotal period where regressions are most likely to occur during their oral feeding progression.

Study Design This is a retrospective study on 101 infants born <35 weeks' gestation. The sample was separated into two groups, infants who experienced a regression during their oral feeding progression and those who did not. A pivotal period was defined as a time frame where setbacks (a decrease in oral feed attempts by one) are most likely to occur at the start (1–2 oral feed attempts per day), middle (3–5 oral feed attempts per day), or end (6–8 oral feed attempts per day) of the oral feeding progression.

Result Eighty-two percent of infants experienced setbacks; 45% of all setbacks occurred at the middle time frame (p = 0.03). Infants' degree of maturity and enteral tube feeding intolerances were associated with increased occurrence of setbacks (p = 0.04).

Conclusion The midpoint in the oral feeding progression is a pivotal period where setbacks are most likely to occur. This time frame can be used by clinicians to evaluate oral-motor skills for earlier provision of interventions to reduce the occurrence of oral feeding difficulties in this high-risk population.

Keywords

prematurity - infants - sucking - bottle/breast feeding
 

  • References

  • 1 American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Hospital discharge of the high-risk neonate. Pediatrics 2008; 122 (05) 1119-1126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Jadcherla SR, Wang M, Vijayapal AS, Leuthner SR. Impact of prematurity and co-morbidities on feeding milestones in neonates: a retrospective study. J Perinatol 2010; 30 (03) 201-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lau C. Development of infant oral feeding skills: what do we know?. Am J Clin Nutr 2016; 103 (02) 616S-621S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Park J, Knafl G, Thoyre S, Brandon D. Factors associated with feeding progression in extremely preterm infants. Nurs Res 2015; 64 (03) 159-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lau C, Geddes D, Mizuno K, Schaal B. The development of oral feeding skills in infants. Int J Pediatr 2012; 2012: 572341
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rommel N, van Wijk M, Boets B. , et al. Development of pharyngo-esophageal physiology during swallowing in the preterm infant. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23 (10) e401-e408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jadcherla S. Dysphagia in the high-risk infant: potential factors and mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr 2016; 103 (02) 622S-628S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Crowe L, Chang A, Wallace K. Instruments for assessing readiness to commence suck feeds in preterm infants: effects on time to establish full oral feeding and duration of hospitalisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (08) CD005586
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Watson J, McGuire W. Responsive versus scheduled feeding for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (10) CD005255
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dutta S, Singh B, Chessell L. , et al. Guidelines for feeding very low birth weight infants. Nutrients 2015; 7 (01) 423-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dodrill P, Donovan T, Cleghorn G, McMahon S, Davies PS. Attainment of early feeding milestones in preterm neonates. J Perinatol 2008; 28 (08) 549-555
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dodrill P, McMahon S, Donovan T, Cleghorn G. Current management of transitional feeding issues in preterm neonates born in Queensland, Australia. Early Hum Dev 2008; 84 (10) 637-643
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hwang YS, Ma MC, Chen-Sea MJ, Kao HM, Tsai WH. Factors affecting early feeding performance in preterm infants below 32 weeks gestation. J Trop Pediatr 2012; 58 (01) 77-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Crapnell TL, Rogers CE, Neil JJ, Inder TE, Woodward LJ, Pineda RG. Factors associated with feeding difficulties in the very preterm infant. Acta Paediatr 2013; 102 (12) e539-e545
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pickler RH, McGrath JM, Reyna BA. , et al. Effects of the neonatal intensive care unit environment on preterm infant oral feeding. Res Rep Neonatol 2013; 2013 (03) 15-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lima AH, Côrtes MG, Bouzada MC, Friche AA. Preterm newborn readiness for oral feeding: systematic review and meta-analysis. CoDAS 2015; 27 (01) 101-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gennattasio A, Perri EA, Baranek D, Rohan A. Oral feeding readiness assessment in premature infants. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2015; 40 (02) 96-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kish MZ. Oral feeding readiness in preterm infants: a concept analysis. Adv Neonatal Care 2013; 13 (04) 230-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jones LR. Oral feeding readiness in the neonatal intensive care unit. Neonatal Netw 2012; 31 (03) 148-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Stevenson DK, Cohen RS, Sunshire P. Neonatology: Clinical Practice and Procedures. Philadelphia: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Bancalari E, Claure N. Definitions and diagnostic criteria for bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol 2006; 30 (04) 164-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Volpe JJ. Intraventricular hemorrhage and brain injury in the premature infant. Neuropathology and pathogenesis. Clin Perinatol 1989; 16 (02) 361-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bell MJ. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. N Engl J Med 1978; 298 (05) 281-282
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 International Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. The international classification of retinopathy of prematurity revisited. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123 (07) 991-999
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Thoyre SM, Brown RL. Factors contributing to preterm infant engagement during bottle-feeding. Nurs Res 2004; 53 (05) 304-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lau C, Smith EO. A novel approach to assess oral feeding skills of preterm infants. Neonatology 2011; 100 (01) 64-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Barlow SM. Oral and respiratory control for preterm feeding. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 17 (03) 179-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lau C, Fucile S, Schanler RJ. A self-paced oral feeding system that enhances preterm infants' oral feeding skills. J Neonatal Nurs 2015; 21 (03) 121-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Fucile S, McFarland DH, Gisel EG, Lau C. Oral and nonoral sensorimotor interventions facilitate suck-swallow-respiration functions and their coordination in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev 2012; 88 (06) 345-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Fucile S, Gisel E, Lau C. Oral stimulation accelerates the transition from tube to oral feeding in preterm infants. J Pediatr 2002; 141 (02) 230-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Law-Morstatt L, Judd DM, Snyder P, Baier RJ, Dhanireddy R. Pacing as a treatment technique for transitional sucking patterns. J Perinatol 2003; 23 (06) 483-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lau C. Is there an advantage for preterm infants to feed orally in an upright or sidelying position?. J Neonatal Nurs 2013; 19 (01) 28-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Lau C, Smith EO. Interventions to improve the oral feeding performance of preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2012; 101 (07) e269-e274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gupta A, Gulati P, Kim W, Fernandez S, Shaker R, Jadcherla SR. Effect of postnatal maturation on the mechanisms of esophageal propulsion in preterm human neonates: primary and secondary peristalsis. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104 (02) 411-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Jadcherla SR, Hoffmann RG, Shaker R. Effect of maturation of the magnitude of mechanosensitive and chemosensitive reflexes in the premature human esophagus. J Pediatr 2006; 149 (01) 77-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Jadcherla SR, Shaker R. Esophageal and upper esophageal sphincter motor function in babies. Am J Med 2001; 111 (Suppl 8A): 64S-68S
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Jadcherla SR. Gastroesophageal reflux in the neonate. Clin Perinatol 2002; 29 (01) 135-158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar