Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000018.xml
Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34(06): 641-645
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1666872
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1666872
Rapid Communication
Rhytidectomy in Patients with Cochlear Implants
Further Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
02 November 2018 (online)
Abstract
As the incidence of rhytidectomy and cochlear implantation increases, so does the likelihood that an individual patient will undergo both procedures over their lifetime. This is particularly relevant as the US population not only ages but ages well. The purpose of this paper is to describe cochlear implants and to characterize pre-, intra-, and postoperative considerations of rhytidectomy in patients with cochlear implants. A thorough understanding of the relevant anatomy and physiology is crucial to the avoidance of potentially serious complications in patients with cochlear implants.
-
References
- 1 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2016 Cosmetic surgery national data bank statistics. Available at: https://www.surgery.org/media/statistics . Accessed June 22, 2017.
- 2 National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. Quick statistics about hearing. Available at: https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/quick-statistics-hearing . Published August 18, 2015. Accessed July 1, 2017
- 3 Bradham T, Jones J. Cochlear implant candidacy in the United States: prevalence in children 12 months to 6 years of age. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 72 (07) 1023-1028
- 4 Lin FR, Chien WW, Li L, Clarrett DM, Niparko JK, Francis HW. Cochlear implantation in older adults. Medicine (Baltimore) 2012; 91 (05) 229-241
- 5 Cochlear. Hearing loss treatments. Availble at: http://www.cochlear.com/wps/wcm/connect/au/home/understand/hearing-and-hl/hl-treatments/cochlear-implant . Accessed June 24, 2017.
- 6 Mangus B, Rivas A, Tsai BS, Haynes DS, Roland Jr JT. Surgical techniques in cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2012; 45 (01) 69-80
- 7 Balkany TJ, Whitley M, Shapira Y. , et al. The temporalis pocket technique for cochlear implantation: an anatomic and clinical study. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30 (07) 903-907
- 8 Manchio JV, Litchfield CR, Sati S, Bryan DJ, Weinzweig J, Vernadakis AJ. Duration of smoking cessation and its impact on skin flap survival. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (04) 1105-1117
- 9 Niamtu J. The revision decision. SURGE Mag. 2010;3(4):26–29. Available at: http://www.lovethatface.com/files/2013/04/SURGE_v2_December20101.pdf
- 10 Niamtu J. Facelift (cervicofacial rhytidectomy). In: Cosmetic Facial Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018: 33-180
- 11 Niamtu III J. Evaluation of the facelift patient. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (01) 1-8
- 12 Jeyakumar A, Wilson M, Sorrel JE. , et al. Monopolar cautery and adverse effects on cochlear implants. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139 (07) 694-697
- 13 Nucleus cochlear implants, important information: Warnings, precautions and electromagnetic compatibility. Sydney, Australia: Cochlear Corporation; 2012
- 14 Jeyakumar A, Jackson NM, Givens VB, Brickman TM, Arriaga MA. Does electrocautery damage cochlear implants?. Otol Neurotol 2015; 36 (04) 600-603
- 15 Behan J, Higgins S, Wysong A. Safety of cochlear implants in electrosurgery: A systematic review of the literature. Dermatol Surg 2017; 43 (06) 775-783
- 16 Varela VH, López RJ, Ingalaturre A, Guevara JM, Collado A. [Cochlear implants using the Ultracision harmonic scalpel]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp ••• 56 (10) 491-494
- 17 Roland Jr JT, Fishman AJ, Waltzman SB, Cohen NL. Shaw scalpel in revision cochlear implant surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2000; 185: 23-25
- 18 Starr JP, Gates RN, Palafox BA, Quill A. Retrospective cohort study comparing redo operations using ferromagnetic dissection and conventional monopolar dissection. Surg Innov 2016; 23 (05) 511-514