Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34(03): 255-260
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1653987
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Twisted Nose: What to Do When It's Not Straight

Joseph R. Gonzalez
1   Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
,
Andrew A. Winkler
1   Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 June 2018 (online)

Abstract

Septorhinoplasty is among the most common facial plastic and reconstructive surgeries and its complexities are reflected in a relatively high revision rate. The patient with a postoperative twisted nose presents an additional challenge and requires that the surgeon display empathy and possess a deep knowledge of the aesthetic and functional intricacies of the nose. Correction of the twisted nose should be approached in a systematic fashion with unique considerations for each “third” of the nose. While there are many options in the overall surgical armamentarium, each surgeon will find specific techniques that are most efficacious and reproducible for their individual practice. This article discusses select surgical “pearls” and techniques that can aid the surgeon in their own surgical decision-making.

 
  • References

  • 1 Tanna N, Nguyen KT, Ghavami A. , et al. Evidence-based medicine: current practices in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (01) 137e-151e
  • 2 American Society of Plastic Surgeons. “2015 plastic surgery statistics report.”
  • 3 Yu K, Kim A, Pearlman SJ. Functional and aesthetic concerns of patients seeking revision rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2010; 12 (05) 291-297
  • 4 Neaman KC, Boettcher AK, Do VH. , et al. Cosmetic rhinoplasty: revision rates revisited. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (01) 31-37
  • 5 Boccieri A. The crooked nose. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2013; 33 (03) 163-168
  • 6 Guyuron B, Uzzo CD, Scull H. A practical classification of septonasal deviation and an effective guide to septal surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (07) 2202-2209 , discussion 2210–2212
  • 7 Rohrich RJ, Gunter JP, Deuber MA, Adams Jr WP. The deviated nose: optimizing results using a simplified classification and algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (06) 1509-1523 , discussion 1524–1525
  • 8 Constantine FC, Ahmad J, Geissler P, Rohrich RJ. Simplifying the management of caudal septal deviation in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (03) 379e-388e
  • 9 Courtiss EH. Septorhinoplasty of the traumatically deformed nose. Ann Plast Surg 1978; 1 (05) 443-449
  • 10 Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Tambone V, Persichetti P. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274 (04) 1807-1811
  • 11 Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (02) 157-163
  • 12 Moubayed SP, Ioannidis JPA, Saltychev M, Most SP. The 10-item Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) for functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; 20 (01) 37-42
  • 13 Cochran CS, Ducic Y, Defatta RJ. Rethinking nasal osteotomies: an anatomic approach. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (04) 662-667
  • 14 Kosins AM, Daniel RK, Nguyen DP. Rhinoplasty: the asymmetric crooked nose-an overview. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (04) 361-373
  • 15 Ghassemi A, Riediger D, Hölzle F, Gerressen M. The intraoral approach to lateral osteotomy: the role of a diamond burr. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37 (01) 135-138
  • 16 Avsar Y. The oscillating micro-saw: a safe and pliable instrument for transverse osteotomy in rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2012; 32: 700-708
  • 17 Ilhan AE, Cengiz B, Caypinar Eser B. Double-blind comparison of ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy in terms of early postoperative edema and ecchymosis. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (04) 390-401
  • 18 Taşkın Ü, Batmaz T, Erdil M, Aydın S, Yücebaş K. The comparison of edema and ecchymosis after piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274 (02) 861-865
  • 19 Meller C, Havas TE. Piezoelectric technology in otolaryngology, and head and neck surgery: a review. J Laryngol Otol 2017; 131 (S2, no. S2): S12-S18
  • 20 Gerbault O, Daniel RK, Kosins AM. The role of piezoelectric instrumentation in rhinoplasty surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (01) 21-34
  • 21 Greywoode JD, Pribitkin EA. Sonic rhinoplasty: histologic correlates and technical refinements using the ultrasonic bone aspirator. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (05) 316-321
  • 22 Ellis DA, Shaikh JA. “The Twisted Nose.”. In Aesthetic Facial Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 1991: 313-325
  • 23 Harshbarger RJ, Sullivan PK. The optimal medial osteotomy: a study of nasal bone thickness and fracture patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (07) 2114-2119 , discussion 2120–2121
  • 24 Rudy S, Moubayed SP, Most SP. Midvault reconstruction in primary rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33 (02) 133-138
  • 25 Foda HM. The crooked nose: correction of dorsal and caudal septal deviations [in German]. HNO 2010; 58 (09) 899-906
  • 26 Oneal RM, Berkowitz RL. Upper lateral cartilage spreader flaps in rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 1998; 18 (05) 370-371
  • 27 Murakami C. Nasal valve collapse. Ear Nose Throat J 2004; 83 (03) 163-164
  • 28 Paniello RC. Nasal valve suspension. An effective treatment for nasal valve collapse. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (12) 1342-1346
  • 29 Pontius AT, Leach Jr JL. New techniques for management of the crooked nose. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004; 6 (04) 263-266
  • 30 Sheen JH. Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73 (02) 230-239
  • 31 Ahmad J, Rohrich RJ. The crooked nose. Clin Plast Surg 2016; 43 (01) 99-113
  • 32 Gubisch W. Twenty-five years experience with extracorporeal septoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2006; 22 (04) 230-239
  • 33 Toriumi DM. Subtotal septal reconstruction: an update. Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29 (06) 492-501
  • 34 Most SP. Anterior septal reconstruction: outcomes after a modified extracorporeal septoplasty technique. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8 (03) 202-207
  • 35 Rimmer J, Ferguson LM, Saleh HA. Versatile applications of the polydioxanone plate in rhinoplasty and septal surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012; 14 (05) 323-330
  • 36 Caughlin BP, Been MJ, Rashan AR, Toriumi DM. The effect of polydioxanone absorbable plates in septorhinoplasty for stabilizing caudal septal extension grafts. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015; 17 (02) 120-125
  • 37 Fuller JC, Levesque PA, Lindsay RW. Polydioxanone plates are safe and effective for L-strut support in functional septorhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (12) 2725-2730
  • 38 Toriumi DM, Checcone MA. New concepts in nasal tip contouring. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2009; 17 (01) 55-90 , vi
  • 39 Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty: creating an aesthetic tip. A preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 80 (06) 775-783
  • 40 McCollough EG, English JL. A new twist in nasal tip surgery. An alternative to the Goldman tip for the wide or bulbous lobule. Arch Otolaryngol 1985; 111 (08) 524-529
  • 41 Gruber RP, Nahai F, Bogdan MA, Friedman GD. Changing the convexity and concavity of nasal cartilages and cartilage grafts with horizontal mattress sutures: part I. Experimental results. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (02) 589-594
  • 42 Kridel RW, Scott BA, Foda HM. The tongue-in-groove technique in septorhinoplasty. A 10-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999; 1 (04) 246-256 , discussion 257–258