J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34(09): 742-748
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1648221
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Proper Choice of Vessels for Supermicrosurgery Training: An Experimental Animal study

Yooseok Ha
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea
,
Seung Han Song
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea
,
Nak Heon Kang
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea
,
Sang-Ha Oh
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea
2   Brain Research Institute, School of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

24 November 2017

22 March 2018

Publication Date:
02 May 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background Reconstruction using supermicrosurgery, a technique of microneurovascular anastomosis for smaller vessels (< 0.8 mm), has become popular. Experimental animal studies for supermicrosurgery training have been reported; however, there have been few studies performed according to vessel diameter and pedicle length. In this study, the external diameters of four vessels (femoral, superficial epigastric, axillary, and common thoracic) and pedicle length of two flaps (superficial epigastric and common thoracic–long thoracic) were measured.

Methods The inguinal and pectoral regions of Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 19) were dissected anatomically, and the external diameters of the four vessels were measured (right and left, artery and vein measured separately). After elevating the superficial epigastric and common thoracic–long thoracic flaps, the pedicle length of the flaps was also measured.

Results Among the 16 vessels examined, the external diameters of 11 and 5 vessels were above and below 0.8 mm, respectively. The external diameters of the superficial epigastric vessel and common thoracic vessel (both arteries and veins) were below 0.8 mm. The external diameters of the femoral and axillary vessels (veins) were above 0.8 mm. The length of the common thoracic–long thoracic pedicle was approximately10 mm longer than that of the superficial epigastric pedicle.

Conclusions The external diameters of the superficial epigastric vessel and common thoracic vessel are small enough for supermicrosurgery training. The pedicle lengths of both the superficial epigastric and common thoracic–long thoracic flaps are sufficient to perform free flap experiments. Supermicrosurgical free flaps using these two vessels and a study of the physiology and pharmacology of the flaps will likely be possible in the future.

 
  • References

  • 1 Koshima I. Microsurgery in the future: introduction to supra-microsurgery and perforator flaps. First International Course on Perforator Flap and Arterialized Skin Flaps. Special invited lecture. Ghent, Belgium: 1997
  • 2 Koshima I, Nanba Y, Tsutsui T, Takahashi Y. Medial plantar perforator flaps with supermicrosurgery. Clin Plast Surg 2003; 30 (03) 447-455 , vii
  • 3 Koshima I, Tsutsui T, Takahashi Y, Nanba Y. Free gluteal artery perforator flap with a short, small perforator. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 51 (02) 200-204
  • 4 Koshima I, Inagawa K, Yamamoto M, Moriguchi T. New microsurgical breast reconstruction using free paraumbilical perforator adiposal flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (01) 61-65
  • 5 Kompatscher P, Manestar M, Schuster A, Lang A, Beer GM. The thoracoacromial vessels as recipient vessels in microsurgery and supermicrosurgery: an anatomical and sonographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (01) 77-83
  • 6 Koshima I, Inagawa K, Urushibara K, Moriguchi T. Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis for the treatment of lymphedema in the upper extremities. J Reconstr Microsurg 2000; 16 (06) 437-442
  • 7 Yamano Y. Replantation of fingertips. J Hand Surg [Br] 1993; 18 (02) 157-162
  • 8 Hong JP. The use of supermicrosurgery in lower extremity reconstruction: the next step in evolution. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (01) 230-235
  • 9 MacDonald JD. Learning to perform microvascular anastomosis. Skull Base 2005; 15 (03) 229-240
  • 10 Yonekawa Y, Frick R, Roth P, Taub E, Imhof H. Laboratory training in microsurgical techniques and microvascular anastomosis. Oper Tech Neurosurg 1999; 2 (03) 149-158
  • 11 Chan WY, Matteucci P, Southern SJ. Validation of microsurgical models in microsurgery training and competence: a review. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (05) 494-499
  • 12 Ozkan O, Koshima I, Gonda K. A supermicrosurgical flap model in the rat: a free true abdominal perforator flap with a short pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (02) 479-485
  • 13 Yamashita S, Sugiyama N, Hasegawa K, Namba Y, Kimata Y. A novel model for supermicrosurgery training: the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap in rats. J Reconstr Microsurg 2008; 24 (08) 537-543
  • 14 Harii K, Omori K, Omori S. Hair transplantation with free scalp flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974; 53 (04) 410-413
  • 15 Matsumura N, Horie Y, Shibata T, Kubo M, Hayashi N, Endo S. Basic training model for supermicrosurgery: a novel practice card model. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27 (06) 377-382
  • 16 Cifuentes IJ, Rodriguez JR, Yañez RA. , et al. A novel ex vivo training model for acquiring supermicrosurgical skills using a chicken leg. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (09) 699-705
  • 17 Zhang F, Sones WD, Lineaweaver WC. Microsurgical flap models in the rat. J Reconstr Microsurg 2001; 17 (03) 211-221
  • 18 Strauch B, Murray DE. Transfer of composite graft with immediate suture anastomosis of its vascular pedicle measuring less than 1 mm. in external diameter using microsurgical techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967; 40 (04) 325-329
  • 19 Petry JJ, Wortham KA. The anatomy of the epigastric flap in the experimental rat. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 74 (03) 410-413
  • 20 Dunn RM, Mancoll J. Flap models in the rat: a review and reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (02) 319-328
  • 21 Padubidri AN, Browne Jr E. Modification in flap design of the epigastric artery flap in rats--a new experimental flap model. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 39 (05) 500-504
  • 22 Ozkan O, Coskunfirat OK, Ozgentas HE. A new experimental flap model: free muscle perforator flap. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 51 (06) 603-606
  • 23 Fujimaki A, O'Brien BM, Kurata T, Threlfall GN. Experimental micro-anastomosis of 0.4-0.5 mm vessels. Br J Plast Surg 1977; 30 (04) 269-272
  • 24 Ikuta Y. Studies on small vessel anastomosis. Hiroshima J Med Sci 1968; 17 (04) 285-311
  • 25 Huang CD, Chow SP, Chan CW. Experience with anastomoses of arteries approximately 0.20 mm in external diameter. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69 (02) 299-305
  • 26 Narushima M, Koshima I, Mihara M, Uchida G, Gonda K. Intravascular stenting (IVaS) for safe and precise supermicrosurgery. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60 (01) 41-44
  • 27 Miyamoto S, Takushima A, Okazaki M, Shiraishi T, Minabe T, Harii K. Free pectoral skin flap in the rat based on the long thoracic vessels: a new flap model for experimental study and microsurgical training. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61 (02) 209-214
  • 28 Bas CE, Cwykiel J, Siemionow M. A new supermicrosurgery training model of saphenous artery and great saphenous vein anastomosis for development of advanced microsurgical skills. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (06) 426-434
  • 29 Koshima I, Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Mihara M, Iida T. Perforator flaps and supermicrosurgery. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (04) 683-689 , vii–iii