Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 1980; 19(02): 99-105
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1635268
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Morphosemantic Analysis of -ITIS Forms in Medical Language

MORPHOSBMANTISCHE ANALYSE VON -ITIS-FORMEN IN DER MEDIZINISCHEN SPRACHE
M. G. Pacak
1   From the Division of Computer Research and Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
,
L. M. Norton
1   From the Division of Computer Research and Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
,
G. S. Dunham
1   From the Division of Computer Research and Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

This paper describes an automated procedure for morphosemantic analysis and semantic interpretation of medical compound word forms ending in -ITIS. The requirements for morphosemantic analysis of -ITIS forms include : a) semantic classification of morphosemantic constituents forming -ITIS word forms, b) establishment of morphosemantic distribution patterns occurring in -ITIS forms, c) preparation of paraphrasing rules.

Diese Arbeit beschreibt ein automatisches Verfahren zur morphosemantischen Analyse und semantischen Interpretation von medizinischen zusammengesetzten Wortformen, die auf -ITIS enden. Die Erfordernisse für die morphosemantische Analyse von -ITIS-Formen beinhalten: a) semantische Klassifikation morphosemantischer Bestandteile, welche -ITIS-Wortformen bilden; b) Feststellung morphosemantischer Verteilungsmuster, wie sie in -ITIS-Formen vorkommen; c) Vorbereitung von Paraphrasierregpln.

Key-Words:

Medical Language - Morphosemantics - Automated Compound Word Segmentation - Paraphrasing

Schlüssel-Wörter:

Medizinische Sprache - Morphosemantik - automatische Segmentierung zusammengesetzter Wörter - Paraphrasierung
 

  • References

  • 1 Ayers M. D. English Words from Greek and Latin Elements. Baltimore, Md.: Williams and Wilkins Co; 1968
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Browh A. F. Normal and Reverse English Word List. Philadelphia, Pa.: University of Pennsylvania; 1963
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Delamare J, Garnter M. Dictionnaire des Termes Techniques de Médicine. Paris: Librairie Maloine S. A; 1969
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Dirks J. H. The Language of Medicine. Hagerstown: Harper and Row; 1976
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Dorland’s Medical Dictionary. 24 th Ed. Philadelphia Pa.: Saunders; 1965
  • 6 Dunham G. S, Pacak M. G, Pratt A. W. Automatic Indexing of Pathology Data. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci 1978; 29: 81-90.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Feebio L. Terminología Medica. Torino: Unione Tipografico — Editrice Torinese; 1967
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Graitson M. Identification et transformation automatique des morphèmes terminaux dans le lexique médical français. Cah. Lexicol 1975; 26: 85-109.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Pacak M, Cousineau L, White W. The Segmentation Approach to Dictionary Construction. J. clin. Comput 1972; 2: 37-43.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Pacak M, Dunham G. S. Automated Morphosemantic Analysis of Compound Word Forms in Medical Language. Internal Report, DORT, NIH 1974
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Pacak M, Dunham G. S. Computers and Medical Language. Med. Inform 1979; 4: 13-27.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Pacak M, Pratt A. W. The Function of Semantics in Automated Language Processing. Proceedings of the Symposium on Information Storage and Retrieval, University of Maryland. 1971: 5-18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Pacak M, Pratt A. W. Identification and Transformation of Terminal Morphemes in Medical English II. Meth. Inform. Med 1978; 17: 95-100.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Pacak M, Pratt A. W, White W. C. Automated Morpho-syntactic Analysis of Medical Language. Inform Proc. Mngmt 1976; 12: 71-76.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Pratt A. W. Medicine, Computers, and Linguistics. Advances in Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 3, New York: Academic Press; 1973: 97-140.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Pratt A. W, Pacak M. Identification and Transformation of Terminal Morphemes in Medical English. Meth. Inform. Med 1969; 8: 84-90.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Roberts F. Medical Terms, Then Origin and Construction. London: William Heinemann Medical Books, Ltd; 1971
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Roussel P. PROLOG: Manuel de référence et d’utilisation. Marseille-Luminy: Groupe d’Intelligence Artificielle; 1975
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Sharpe D. W. The Evolution of a Medical Vocabulary. J. clin. Comput 3 1973
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Stedman’s Medical Dictionary. 18 th Ed. Baltimore Md.: Williams and Wilkins Co.; 1966
  • 21 Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) Skokie, III.: College of American Pathologists; 1976
  • 22 Systematized Nomenclature oe Pathology (SNOP) Chicago, Ill.: College of American Pathologists; 1965
  • 23 Warren D.H.D. Implementing PROLOG — Compiling Predicate Logic Programs. Research Reports 39 and 40. Edinburgh: Dept. of Artificial Intelligence; 1977
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Wabben D. H. D, Pereira L. M, Pereira F.C.N. PROLOG — The Language and its Implementation Compared with LISP. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Programming Languages, Rochester, N.Y. 1977. SIGART/SIGPLAN Notices 1911: 109-115.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Wingert F. Morphosyntactical Analysis of Medical Compound Word Forms. In: Schneider W, Săgvall Hein A.-L. (Eds): Computational Linguistics in Medicine Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1977: 79-89.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Zetkin M, Kuhtz E. H, Fichel K. Wörterbuch der Medizin. Berlin: VEB Verlag Volk und Gesundheit; 1969
    Search in Google Scholar