Trabecular anisotropy and collagen fibre orientation in the mandibular condyle following experimental functional appliance treatment using sheep

Summary

In order to study the modifying effects of functional appliances on the mechanical environment of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), we characterised the structure of the mandibular condyle subsequent to an experimental functional appliance intervention. Eight, four-month-old, castrated male Merino sheep, were randomly allocated to experimental and control groups (n = 4 in each group). Forward mandibular displacement was induced with an intraoral appliance. The study period was 15 weeks, during which time fluorochromes were administered to all of the animals. Midsagittal sections of the TMJ were selected for analysis and trabecular anisotropy was estimated using bone histomorphometry. Only the experimental group demonstrated that the trabecular bone in the central condylar region was less anisotropic when compared to the subchondral region. Also, the variation in trabecular anisotropy of the central condylar region was found to be smaller in the experimental group. The collagen fibre orientation was analysed under polarised light as the proportion of the dark or bright fibres observed in regions which existed before, and regions which formed during the experiment, as determined by the fluorochrome labels. In the experimental group, more bright collagen fibres were found in the most superior region of the mandibular condyle when compared with the controls. These results suggested that the experimental functional appliances changed the orientation and pattern of the mechanical forces acting on the mandibular condyle, and possibly increased the magnitude of the lateral functional forces applied to the most superior part of the condyle during such treatments.

Keywords

Sheep mandibular condyle - growth modification - collagen fibre orientation - trabecular anisotropy

• References

• 1 Aggarwal P, Kharbanda OP, Mathur R. et al. Muscle response to the twin-block appliance: an electromyographic study of the masseter and anterior temporal muscles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 405-14.
• 2 Ascenzi A, Bonucci E. The ultimate tensile strength of single osteons. Acta Anat 1964; 58: 160-83.
• 3 Ascenzi A, Bonucci E. The tensile properties of single osteons. Anat Rec 1967; 158: 375-86.
• 4 Ascenzi A, Bonucci E. The compressive properties of single osteons. Anat Rec 1968; 161: 377-92.
• 5 Biewener AA, Fazzalari NL, Konieczynski DD. et al. Adaptive changes in trabecular bone architecture in relationship to functional strain pattern and disuse. Bone 1996; 19: 1-8.
• 6 Birkebaek L, Melsen B, Terp S. A laminagraphic study of the alterations in the temporomandibular joint following activator treatment. Eur J Orthod 1984; 6: 257-66.
• 7 Boyde A, Bianco P, Portigliatti-Barbos M. et al. Collagen orientation in compact bone: I. A new method for the determination of the proportion of collagen parallel to the plane of compact bone sections. Metab Bone Dis Rel Res 1984; 5: 299-307.
• 8 Boyde A, Riggs CM. The quantitative study of the orientation of collagen in compact bone slices. Bone 1990; 11: 35-9.
• 9 Charlier JP, Petrovic A, Herrmann-Stutzmann J. Effects ofmandibularhyperpropulsion on the pre-chondroblastic zone of young rat condyle. Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 71-4.
• 10 Chintakanon K, Turker K, Sampson W. et al. Effects of twin-block therapy on protrusive muscle functions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000; 118: 392-6.
• 11 Compston JE, Vedi S, Stellon AJ. Inter-observer and intra-observer variation in bone histomorphometry. Calcif Tissue Int 1986; 38: 67-70.
• 12 de Vernejoul MC, Knutz D, Miravet L. et al. Bone histomorphometric reproducibility in normal patients. CalcifTissue Int 1981; 33: 369-74.
• 13 Eckstein F, Jacobs CR, Merz R. Mechanobiological adaptation of subchondral bone as a function of joint incongruity and loading. Med Eng Phys 1997; 19: 720-8.
• 14 Eckstein F, Merz B, Schon M. et al. Tension and bending, butnot compression alone determine the functional adaptation of subchondral bone in congruous joints. Anat Embryol 1999; 199: 85-97.
• 15 Giesen EBW, van Eijden TMGJ. The three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the human mandibular condyle. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 957-63.
• 16 Graber TM. Functional appliances. In: Orthodontics current principles and techniques. Graber TM, Vanarsdall JR. (eds) St. Louis: Mosby; 2000: 473-520.
• 17 Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of bass, bionator and twin-block appliances Part I. The hard tissue. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20: 501-16.
• 18 Jacobs C, Eckstein F. Computer simulation of subchondral bone adaptation to mechanical loading in an incongruous joint. Anat Rec 1997; 249: 317-26.
• 19 Kalmey JK, Lovejoy CO. Collagen fiber orientation in the femoral necks of apes and humans: do their histological structures reflect differences in locomotor loading?. Bone 2002; 31: 327-32.
• 20 Ma B. Growth modification of the temporomandibular joint by functional appliances: a histimorphometric study using sheep (PhD thesis). The University of Adelaide; 2002
• 21 Ma B, Sampson W, Fazzalari N. et al. Induced mandibular condylar growth in a sheep model after functional appliance treatment. Australian Orthod J 2001; 17: 81-8.
• 22 Ma B, Sampson W, Fazzalari N. et al. Experimental forward mandibular displacement in sheep. Arch Oral Biol 2002; 47: 75-84.
• 23 Ma B, Sampson W, Wilson D. et al. A histomorphometric study of adaptive responses of cancellous bone in different regions in the sheep mandibular condyle following experimental forward mandibular displacement. Arch Oral Biol 2002; 47: 519-27.
• 24 Martin RB, Ishida J. The relative effects of collagen fiber orientation, porosity, density, and mineralization on bone strength. J Biomech 1989; 22: 419-26.
• 25 Martin RB, Lau ST, Mathews PV. et al. Collagen fibre organization is related to mechanical properties and remodelling in equine bone, a comparision of two methods. J Biomech 1996; 29: 1515-21.
• 26 McNamara JAJr, Carlson DS. Quantitative analysis of temporomandibular joint adaptations to protrusive function. Am J Orthod 1979; 76: 593-611.
• 27 McNamara JAJr. Functional determinants of craniofacial size and shape. Eur J Orthod 1980; 2: 131-59.
• 28 Osaki S, Tohno S, Tohno Y. et al. Determination of the orientation of collagen fibers in human bone. Anat Rec 2002; 266: 103-7.
• 29 Pancherz H. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1979; 76: 423-42.
• 30 Petrovic AG, Stutzmann J, Oudet C. Orthopedic appliances modulate the bone formation in the mandible as a whole. Swed Dent J (Suppl) 1982; 15: 197-201.
• 31 Sessle BJ, Woodside DG, Bourque P. et al. Effect of functional appliances on jaw muscle activity. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 98: 222-30.
• 32 Stutzmann JJ, Petrovic AG. A new parameter for estimating condylar growth direction. In: Dentofacial Orthopedics with Functional Appliances, 2nd ed. Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG (eds). Mosby, St. Louis 1997; 64-73.
• 33 Teng S, Herring SW. Anatomic and directional variation in the mechanical properties of the mandibular condyle in pig. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1842-50.
• 34 Vargervik K, Harvold EP. Response to activator treatment in class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 242-51.
• 35 Williams S, Melsen B. Condylar development and mandibular rotation and displacement during activator treatment: an implant study. Am J Orthod 1982; 81: 322-6.
• 36 Woodside DG. Do functional appliances have orthopedic effects?. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113: 11-4.
• 37 Wright CDP, Vedi S, Garrahan NJ. et al. Combined inter-observer and inter-method variation in bone histomorphometry. Bone 1992; 13: 205-8.
• 38 Yamin-Lacouture C, Woodside DG, Sectakof PA. et al. The action of three types of functional appliances on the activity of the masticatory muscles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112: 560-72.