Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999; 12(01): 20-25
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632553
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Fine Morphological Assessment of Stripped Screw Sites in Cortical Bone

R. B. Fitch
1   From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
,
J. L. Oliver
2   Veterinary Pathology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
,
G. Hosgood
1   From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
,
R. M. Moore
1   From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received:05 January 1998

Accepted:17 April 1998

Publication Date:
10 February 2018 (online)

Summary

Unintentional over-tightening of orthopaedic screws resulting in loss of screw purchase (“screw stripping”) is a potential complication during fracture fixation. This report describes the microstructural and radiographic effects on bone caused by stripping a 2.7 mm orthopaedic screw, and subsequent replacement in these stripped screw sites with either a 3.5 mm cortical or a 4.0 mm cancellous orthopaedic screws in both tapped and untapped holes. Over-tightening of a 2.7 mm screw resulted in shearing of the bone directly engaged by the screw threads. Additional fractures occurred in surrounding bone, primarily superficial subperiosteal saucer fractures in the cis cortex and to a lesser degree, in the subendosteum of the trans cortex. Bone damage was consistently more severe in the cis cortex. Salvaging stripped screw sites by insertion of a 3.5 mm or 4.0 mm screw resulted in additional fracturing and displacement, which was more severe in the untapped sites. Decreased holding power of screws placed in stripped screw sites could be attributed to collateral structural bone damage occurring during screw stripping and replacement screw application.

Over-tightening of orthopaedic screws until mechanical failure (“screw stripping”) results in damage to cortical bone which extends beyond the outer thread diameter of the screw. Damage, most often subperiosteal saucer fractures, was greater in the cis cortex. The subperiosteal saucer fractures decreased the functional length of screw engagement of the larger replacement screws in the cortical bone, which may account for decreases in expected holding power.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Nunamaker D. Perren S. Force measurements in screw fixation. J Biomechan 1976; 9: 669-75.
  • 2 Korvick DL, Monville JD, Pijanowski GJ. et al The effects of screw removal on bone strain in an idealized plated bone model. Vet Surg 1988; 17: 111-6.
  • 3 Boyd CL, Bynum D. Ray DR. et al In Vitro evaluation of bone fasteners. Southwestern Vet 1970; 23: 279-81.
  • 4 Gantous A, Phillips JH. The effects of varying pilot hole size on the holding power of miniscrews and microscrews. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995: 1165-9.
  • 5 Anderson MA, Mann FA, Kinden DA. et al Evaluation of cortical bone damage and axial holding power of nonthreaded and enhanced threaded pins placed with and without drilling of a pilot hole in femurs from canine cadavers. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996; 208 (06) 883-7.
  • 6 McDonald DE, Palmer RH, Hulse DA. et al Holding power of external skeletal fixator pins in the near and far cortices of cadaver canine tibiae. Vet Surg 1994; 23: 488-93.
  • 7 Fitch R, Kerwin S, Sedrish S. et al In vitro comparison of the holding power of 3.5 mm versus 4.0 mm cancellous orthopedic screws placed in canine tibial screw sites previously stripped by a 2.7 mm cortical screw. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1998; 11: 146-51.
  • 8 Hughes AN, Jordan BA. The mechanical properties of surgical bone screws and some aspects of insertion practice. Injury. British J Accident Surg 1972; 4: 25-38.
  • 9 DeCoster TA, Heetderks DB, Downey DJ. et al Optimizing bone screw pullout force. J Orthop Trauma 1990; 4: 169-74.
  • 10 Kirpensteijn J, Jean G, Roush JK. et al Holding power of orthopedic screws in metacarpal and metatarsal bones of young calves. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1992; 5: 100-3.
  • 11 Sardinas JC, Kraus KH, Sisson R. Comparison of the holding power of 3.5mm cortical versus 4.0mm cancellous orthopedic screws in the pelvis of immature dogs (cadavers). Am J Vet Res 1995; 56: 248-51.
  • 12 Yovich JV, Turner AS, Smith FW. Holding power of orthopedic screws in equine third metacarpal and metatarsal bones, Part II. Adult Horse Bone. Vet Surg 1985; 14: 230-4.
  • 13 Yovich JV, Turner AS, Smith FW. Holding power of orthopedic screws in equine third metacarpal and metatarsal bones, Part I. Foal bone. Vet Surg 1985; 14 (03) 221-9.
  • 14 Yovich JV, Turner AS, Smith FW. Holding power of orthopedic screws; comparison of self-tapped and pre-tapped screws in foal bones. Vet Surg 1986; 15 (01) 55-9.
  • 15 Hearn T, Surowiak J, Schatzker J. Effects of tapping on the holding strength of cancellous bone screws. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1992; 5: 10-2.
  • 16 Chapman JR, Harrington RM, Lee LM. et al Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J Biomech Eng 1996; 118 (03) 391-8.
  • 17 Boyle JM, Frost DE, Foley WL. et al Evaluation of emergency screws in nonstripped pilot holes in bone. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1993; 8: 211-5.
  • 18 Boyle JM, Frost DE, Foley DE. et al. Torque and pullout analysis of six currently available self-tapping and "emergency" screws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51: 45-50.