Development and Evaluation of a Simulation Model for Microvascular Anastomosis Training

Abstract

Background Many plastic surgery training programs have implemented microvascular preparatory courses. However, these courses vary in length across institutions, lack formal assessment, and trainees receive certificates of completion rather than competency. In addition, many institutions use animate tissues as practice models which may not be readily available, require special treatment or storage, and lack consistency across vessel segments. In this study, we developed a proficiency-based training microvascular anastomosis curriculum using a synthetic model. In addition, we developed and validated a scoring rubric and patency testing apparatus.

Methods Proficiency benchmarks were developed by evaluating four plastic surgeons performing interrupted end-to-end anastomoses on synthetic vessels mounted superficially and at depth. Using a pretest–posttest design, seven plastic surgery residents from two institutions were asked to train to proficiency on the superficial exercise. Skills transfer was evaluated using a vessel mounted at depth. Each anastomosis was scored on 11 metrics of mechanics, completion time, stenosis, and leakage.

Results Experts outperformed residents prior to engaging in the training curriculum, confirming construct validity. Residents' skills significantly improved on 10 of 14 metrics after training, confirming curriculum effectiveness. Only one resident was able to achieve all proficiency benchmarks on two consecutive training trials. Skills learned on the superficially mounted vessel moderately transferred to the vessel mounted at depth as evidenced by significant pre- to posttest learning gains for 4 of the 14 metrics.

Conclusion The proficiency goals may have been overly stringent; however, residents improved microvascular anastomosis skills on the majority of metrics by engaging in simulation-based training using a readily available synthetic model.

Keywords

simulation - surgical education - proficiency-based training

• References

• 1 Willis RE, Richa J, Oppeltz R. , et al. Comparing three pedagogical approaches to psychomotor skills acquisition. Am J Surg 2012; 203 (01) 8-13
• 2 Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Römer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev 1993; 100 (03) 363-406
• 3 Gallagher AG. Metric-based simulation training to proficiency in medical education:- what it is and how to do it. Ulster Med J 2012; 81 (03) 107-113
• 4 Goova MT, Hollett LA, Tesfay ST. , et al. Implementation, construct validity, and benefit of a proficiency-based knot-tying and suturing curriculum. J Surg Educ 2008; 65 (04) 309-315
• 5 Mashaud LB, Arain NA, Hogg DC, Scott DJ. Development, validation, and implementation of a cost-effective intermediate-level proficiency-based knot-tying and suturing curriculum for surgery residents. J Surg Educ 2013; 70 (02) 193-199
• 6 Ritter EM, Scott DJ. Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 2007; 14 (02) 107-112
• 7 Van Sickle KR, Buck L, Willis R. , et al. A multicenter, simulation-based skills training collaborative using shared GI Mentor II systems: results from the Texas Association of Surgical Skills Laboratories (TASSL) flexible endoscopy curriculum. Surg Endosc 2011; 25 (09) 2980-2986
• 8 Lyons C, Goldfarb D, Jones SL. , et al. Which skills really matter? proving face, content, and construct validity for a commercial robotic simulator. Surg Endosc 2013; 27 (06) 2020-2030
• 9 Theman TA, Labow BI. Is there bias against simulation in microsurgery training?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (07) 540-545
• 10 Ghanem AM, Al Omran Y, Shatta B, Kim E, Myers S. Anastomosis lapse index (ALI): a validated end product assessment tool for simulation microsurgery training. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (03) 233-241
• 11 Kim E, Singh M, Akelina Y, Shurey S, Myers SR, Ghanem AM. Effect of microvascular anastomosis technique on end product outcome in simulated training: a prospective blinded randomized controlled trial. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (07) 556-561
• 12 Stone JP, Doherty CC, Schrag CH. Incidence and type of errors in microsurgical technique in surgical trainees. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (07) 528-532
• 13 Trignano E, Fallico N, Zingone G, Dessy LA, Campus GV. Microsurgical training with the three-step approach. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (02) 87-91
• 14 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR. , et al. The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill: the use of clinically relevant outcome measures. Ann Surg 2004; 240 (02) 374-381
• 15 Klein I, Steger U, Timmermann W, Thiede A, Gassel HJ. Microsurgical training course for clinicians and scientists at a German University hospital: a 10-year experience. Microsurgery 2003; 23 (05) 461-465
• 16 de Klerk DJ, Ploncard P. Laboratory training in microsurgical techniques for neurosurgery. S Afr Med J 1972; 46 (45) 1740-1742
• 17 Balasundaram I, Aggarwal R, Darzi LA. Development of a training curriculum for microsurgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 48 (08) 598-606
• 18 Nimmons GL, Chang KE, Funk GF, Shonka DC, Pagedar NA. Validation of a task-specific scoring system for a microvascular surgery simulation model. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (10) 2164-2168
• 19 Chan W, Niranjan N, Ramakrishnan V. Structured assessment of microsurgery skills in the clinical setting. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (08) 1329-1334
• 20 Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med 2006; 119 (02) 166.e7-166.e16
• 21 Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Satava RM. Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg Endosc 2003; 17 (10) 1525-1529
• 22 Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA. , et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002; 236 (04) 458-463 , discussion 463–464
• 23 Aggarwal R, Ward J, Balasundaram I, Sains P, Athanasiou T, Darzi A. Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 2007; 246 (05) 771-779
• 24 Gomez PP, Willis RE, Van Sickle K. Evaluation of two flexible colonoscopy simulators and transfer of skills into clinical practice. J Surg Educ 2015; 72 (02) 220-227
• 25 Cohen ER, Feinglass J, Barsuk JH. , et al. Cost savings from reduced catheter-related bloodstream infection after simulation-based education for residents in a medical intensive care unit. Simul Healthc 2010; 5 (02) 98-102
• 26 Andreatta P, Saxton E, Thompson M, Annich G. Simulation-based mock codes significantly correlate with improved pediatric patient cardiopulmonary arrest survival rates. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011; 12 (01) 33-38
• 27 Wayne DB, Didwania A, Feinglass J, Fudala MJ, Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC. Simulation-based education improves quality of care during cardiac arrest team responses at an academic teaching hospital: a case-control study. Chest 2008; 133 (01) 56-61
• 28 Evgeniou E, Tsironi M, Riley D. Improving fellowship training in microsurgery: a threshold concepts perspective on the curricula of fellowship programs. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (08) 579-589
• 29 Szalay D, MacRae H, Regehr G, Reznick R. Using operative outcome to assess technical skill. Am J Surg 2000; 180 (03) 234-237
• 30 Lascar I, Totir D, Cinca A. , et al. Training program and learning curve in experimental microsurgery during the residency in plastic surgery. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (04) 263-267
• 31 Blackwell KE, Brown MT, Gonzalez D. Overcoming the learning curve in microvascular head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123 (12) 1332-1335
• 32 Hui KC, Zhang F, Shaw WW. , et al. Learning curve of microvascular venous anastomosis: a never ending struggle?. Microsurgery 2000; 20 (01) 22-24
• 33 Van Sickle KR, Ritter EM, Smith CD. The pretrained novice: using simulation-based training to improve learning in the operating room. Surg Innov 2006; 13 (03) 198-204