Impact of Time Interval between Radiation and Free Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Abstract

Background To evaluate whether the timing of surgery after radiation in autologous breast reconstruction affects major complications.

Methods We performed a retrospective review of 454 free flaps (331 patients) for breast reconstruction at a single institution from 2003 to 2014. Charts were reviewed for age, BMI, laterality, flap type (TRAM, msTRAM, DIEP), surgeon, donor vessels (IMA, TD), chemotherapy, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, DVT, venous anastomoses, vein size, and time from radiation (none, < 12 months, or ≥ 12 months). The primary outcome of major complications was defined as partial/total flap loss, thrombosis, ischemia, or hematoma requiring return to the operating room. To identify independent predictors of major complications, a multivariate logistic regression was constructed. Alpha = 0.05 indicated significance in all tests.

Results Average age was 47.4 ± 8.4. Free flaps consisted of msTRAM (41.1%), TRAM (29.6%), or DIEP (29.3%). The donor vessel was IMA in 66.9% of flaps or TD in 33.0% of patients with 90.7% using only one vein and 9.3% with two veins. The average IMA/TDV size was 2.5 cm ± 0.5. Preoperative radiation occurred in 31.2% of flaps. There were 54 flaps with at least one major complication (11.7%). On multivariate regression, only flap type (OR =4.04, p < .01) and vein size (OR = 0.13, p = 0.02) independently predicted major complications.

Conclusion There was no significant difference in major complications between flaps who had reconstruction within 12 months and greater than 12 months after radiation. Only having a more muscle sparing technique or smaller vein size were independent risk factors for major complications.

Keywords

radiation - free flap - autologous breast reconstruction

• References

• 1 Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (2) 395-408
• 2 Spear SL, Onyewu C. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (3) 930-942
• 3 Tran NV, Chang DW, Gupta A, Kroll SS, Robb GL. Comparison of immediate and delayed free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (1) 78-82
• 4 O'Sullivan B, Davis AM, Turcotte R , et al. Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the limbs: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359 (9325): 2235-2241
• 5 Chao AH, Chang DW, Shuaib SW, Hanasono MM. The effect of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant irradiation on microvascular free flap reconstruction in sarcoma patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (3) 675-682
• 6 Baumann DP, Crosby MA, Selber JC , et al. Optimal timing of delayed free lower abdominal flap breast reconstruction after postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (3) 1100-1106
• 7 Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, de Blacam C, Gautam S, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Delayed autologous breast reconstruction after postmastectomy radiation therapy: is there an optimal time?. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (1) 14-18
• 8 Butler PD, Wu LC. Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2015; 4 (3) 212-221
• 9 Fischer JP, Sieber B, Nelson JA , et al. Comprehensive outcome and cost analysis of free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction: an experience with 1303 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (2) 195-203
• 10 Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (2) 466-475 , discussion 476–477
• 11 Andrades P, Fix RJ, Danilla S , et al. Ischemic complications in pedicle, free, and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60 (5) 562-567
• 12 Broer PN, Weichman KE, Tanna N , et al. Venous coupler size in autologous breast reconstruction—does it matter?. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (7) 514-518
• 13 Miller RB, Reece G, Kroll SS , et al. Microvascular breast reconstruction in the diabetic patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (1) 38-45 , discussion 46–48
• 14 Schaverien MV, Munnoch DA. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on outcomes of immediate free autologous breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39 (5) 430-436
• 15 Hicks Jr GL. Coronary artery operation in radiation-associated atherosclerosis: long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 53 (4) 670-674
• 16 Renner SM, Massel D, Moon BC. Mediastinal irradiation: a risk factor for atherosclerosis of the internal thoracic arteries. Can J Cardiol 1999; 15 (5) 597-600
• 17 Nasso G, Canosa C, De Filippo CM , et al. Thoracic radiation therapy and suitability of internal thoracic arteries for myocardial revascularization. Chest 2005; 128 (3) 1587-1592
• 18 Krag C, De Rose G, Lyczakowski T, Freeman CR, Shapiro SH. Free flaps and irradiated recipient vessels: an experimental study in rabbits. Br J Plast Surg 1982; 35 (3) 328-336
• 19 Tan E, O'Brien BM, Brennen M. Free flap transfer in rabbits using irradiated recipient vessels. Br J Plast Surg 1978; 31 (2) 121-123
• 20 Schultze-Mosgau S, Rödel F, Radespiel-Tröger M, Wörl J, Grabenbauer GG, Neukam FW. Vascularization of the area between free grafts and irradiated graft beds in the neck in rats. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 40 (1) 37-44
• 21 Schultze-Mosgau S, Grabenbauer GG, Radespiel-Tröger M , et al. Vascularization in the transition area between free grafted soft tissues and pre-irradiated graft bed tissues following preoperative radiotherapy in the head and neck region. Head Neck 2002; 24 (1) 42-51
• 22 Halle M, Bodin I, Tornvall P, Wickman M, Farnebo F, Arnander C. Timing of radiotherapy in head and neck free flap reconstruction—a study of postoperative complications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (7) 889-895