Range of Motion of the Upper Extremity in a Healthy Pediatric Population: Introduction to Normative Data

Abstract

Objective In the pediatric population traumatic injuries of the upper extremity are common. After therapy a decision has to be made if the mobility of the joint lies within a normal range. The purpose of this study was to give an introduction to normative data. We investigate if there is a significant difference in the range of motion (ROM) between male and female probands and furthermore, if an effect of the age can be detected.

Methods We performed an institutional review board-approved study of healthy girls and boys aged between 2 and 16 years without any medical history of an upper extremity fracture. We investigated the active ROM of the elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal, and interphalangeal joints. Furthermore, age, handedness, weight, and height were recorded. A total of 171 adolescents with a mean age of 10.6 years were included and separated into four cohorts by age: 2 to 5, 6 to 10, 11 to 13, and 14 to 16 years.

Results We found significant differences between the genders in the age group from 11 to 13 years for the flexion of the elbow, the pronation, the flexion of the interphalangeal joint of the thumb, as well as the flexion of the metacarpophalangeal joints of digitus II to V. Furthermore, a significant difference in the same joints except from the elbow flexion could be demonstrated between the genders.

Conclusion Our study contributes normative data for upper extremity ROM in the pediatric population and presents a gender-related difference in certain joints.

Clinical Relevance Normative data for the ROM of upper extremity joints in children is helpful for the evaluation of pediatric orthopedic patients and provides the framework for therapeutic resolution. Since a great number of traumatic injuries in children affect the upper extremity, this information may help the physician to estimate the impact of the injury and decide on the therapeutic management.

Keywords

upper extremity - pediatric population - range of motion

• References

• 1 Hanlon CR, Estes Jr WL. Fractures in childhood, a statistical analysis. Am J Surg 1954; 87 (3) 312-323
• 2 Reikerås O. Bilateral differences of normal hand strength. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1983; 101 (3) 223-224
• 3 Gûnal I, Köse N, Erdogan O, Göktürk E, Seber S. Normal range of motion of the joints of the upper extremity in male subjects, with special reference to side. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78 (9) 1401-1404
• 4 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C ; The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. Am J Ind Med 1996; 29 (6) 602-608
• 5 Jester A, Harth A, Rauch J, Germann G. DASH data of non-clinical versus clinical groups of persons—a comparative study of T-norms for clinical use [in German]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2010; 42 (1) 55-64
• 6 Klum M, Wolf MB, Hahn P, Leclère FM, Bruckner T, Unglaub F. Predicting grip strength and key pinch using anthropometric data, DASH questionnaire and wrist range of motion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132 (12) 1807-1811
• 7 Sankar WN, Laird CT, Baldwin KD. Hip range of motion in children: what is the norm?. J Pediatr Orthop 2012; 32 (4) 399-405
• 8 Barad JH, Kim RS, Ebramzadeh E, Silva M. Range of motion of the healthy pediatric elbow: cross-sectional study of a large population. J Pediatr Orthop B 2013; 22 (2) 117-122
• 9 Cave EF, Roberts SM. A method of measuring and recording joint function. J Bone Joint Surg 1936; 18 (2) 455-466
• 10 Lefevre-Colau MM, Poiraudeau S, Oberlin C , et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the modified Kapandji index for assessment of functional mobility of the rheumatoid hand. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84 (7) 1032-1038
• 11 Swanson AB, Göran-Hagert C, de Groot Swanson G. Evaluation of impairment in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am 1987; 12 (5 Pt 2) 896-926
• 12 Armstrong AD, MacDermid JC, Chinchalkar S, Stevens RS, King GJ. Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998; 7 (6) 573-580
• 13 Carter TI, Pansy B, Wolff AL , et al. Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (8) 1422-1428
• 14 Lewis E, Fors L, Tharion WJ. Interrater and intrarater reliability of finger goniometric measurements. Am J Occup Ther 2010; 64 (4) 555-561
• 15 Colaris J, van der Linden M, Selles R, Coene N, Allema JH, Verhaar J. Pronation and supination after forearm fractures in children: Reliability of visual estimation and conventional goniometry measurement. Injury 2010; 41 (6) 643-646
• 16 de Kraker M, Selles RW, Molenaar TM, Schreuders TA, Hovius SE, Stam HJ. Palmar abduction measurements: reliability and introduction of normative data in healthy children. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (9) 1704-1708
• 17 Golden DW, Jhee JT, Gilpin SP, Sawyer JR. Elbow range of motion and clinical carrying angle in a healthy pediatric population. J Pediatr Orthop B 2007; 16 (2) 144-149
• 18 Klum M, Wolf MB, Hahn P, Leclère FM, Bruckner T, Unglaub F. Normative data on wrist function. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (10) 2050-2060