J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2015; 76(06): 508-512
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558408
Case Report
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Recruitment of Contralateral Supplementary Motor Area in Functional Recovery Following Medial Frontal Lobe Surgery: An fMRI Case Study

Marcus Andre Acioly
1   Division of Neurosurgery, State University of Rio de Janeiro - Surgical Specialties, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Alexandre Martins Cunha
1   Division of Neurosurgery, State University of Rio de Janeiro - Surgical Specialties, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Maud Parise
1   Division of Neurosurgery, State University of Rio de Janeiro - Surgical Specialties, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Erika Rodrigues
2   Department of Neuroimaging, I'Dor Neuroimaging Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Fernanda Tovar-Moll
2   Department of Neuroimaging, I'Dor Neuroimaging Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

22 October 2014

31 March 2015

Publication Date:
20 August 2015 (online)

Abstract

Background and Objective Supplementary motor area (SMA) syndrome, an executive disorder with motor and speech dysfunctions, is rather unpredictable with typically a complete or almost complete functional recovery within weeks or months. Compensatory mechanisms are associated with contralateral cortical recruitment of the lateral premotor circuitry. We sought to investigate the role of healthy SMA for motor recovery following surgery in the medial frontal lobe.

Methods A 48-year-old right-handed man presented with focal motor seizures. The diagnostic work-up revealed a low-grade glioma at the superior frontal gyrus. The patient was operated on with intraoperative monitoring of motor pathways, and resection was taken to the functional boundaries.

Results Postoperatively, the patient experienced a typical SMA syndrome that almost completely resolved in the long term. Motor recovery occurred concurrently with a shift of SMA activation to the healthy hemisphere together with an increased lateral premotor circuitry, especially for the hand map.

Conclusion Our results confirm brain remodeling of the lateral premotor cortex, as previously described, and indicate that functional improvement is also paralleled with a shift of SMA activation toward the healthy hemisphere.

 
  • References

  • 1 Penfield W, Welch K. The supplementary motor area of the cerebral cortex; a clinical and experimental study. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1951; 66 (3) 289-317
  • 2 Nachev P, Kennard C, Husain M. Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; 9 (11) 856-869
  • 3 Boy F, Husain M, Singh KD, Sumner P. Supplementary motor area activations in unconscious inhibition of voluntary action. Exp Brain Res 2010; 206 (4) 441-448
  • 4 Laplane D, Talairach J, Meininger V, Bancaud J, Orgogozo JM. Clinical consequences of corticectomies involving the supplementary motor area in man. J Neurol Sci 1977; 34 (3) 301-314
  • 5 Krainik A, Lehéricy S, Duffau H , et al. Role of the supplementary motor area in motor deficit following medial frontal lobe surgery. Neurology 2001; 57 (5) 871-878
  • 6 Krainik A, Lehéricy S, Duffau H , et al. Postoperative speech disorder after medial frontal surgery: role of the supplementary motor area. Neurology 2003; 60 (4) 587-594
  • 7 Krainik A, Duffau H, Capelle L , et al. Role of the healthy hemisphere in recovery after resection of the supplementary motor area. Neurology 2004; 62 (8) 1323-1332
  • 8 Nelson L, Lapsiwala S, Haughton VM , et al. Preoperative mapping of the supplementary motor area in patients harboring tumors in the medial frontal lobe. J Neurosurg 2002; 97 (5) 1108-1114
  • 9 Rosenberg K, Nossek E, Liebling R , et al. Prediction of neurological deficits and recovery after surgery in the supplementary motor area: a prospective study in 26 patients. J Neurosurg 2010; 113 (6) 1152-1163
  • 10 Rostomily RC, Berger MS, Ojemann GA, Lettich E. Postoperative deficits and functional recovery following removal of tumors involving the dominant hemisphere supplementary motor area. J Neurosurg 1991; 75 (1) 62-68
  • 11 Russell SM, Kelly PJ. Incidence and clinical evolution of postoperative deficits after volumetric stereotactic resection of glial neoplasms involving the supplementary motor area. Neurosurgery 2007; 61 (1, Suppl): 358-367 ; discussion 367–368
  • 12 Sailor J, Meyerand ME, Moritz CH , et al. Supplementary motor area activation in patients with frontal lobe tumors and arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24 (9) 1837-1842
  • 13 Zentner J, Hufnagel A, Pechstein U, Wolf HK, Schramm J. Functional results after resective procedures involving the supplementary motor area. J Neurosurg 1996; 85 (4) 542-549
  • 14 Thulborn KR, Carpenter PA, Just MA. Plasticity of language-related brain function during recovery from stroke. Stroke 1999; 30 (4) 749-754
  • 15 Duffau H. New concepts in surgery of WHO grade II gliomas: functional brain mapping, connectionism and plasticity—a review. J Neurooncol 2006; 79 (1) 77-115
  • 16 Reinges MH, Krings T, Rohde V , et al. Prospective demonstration of short-term motor plasticity following acquired central pareses. Neuroimage 2005; 24 (4) 1248-1255
  • 17 Roux FE, Ranjeva JP, Boulanouar K , et al. Motor functional MRI for presurgical evaluation of cerebral tumors. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1997; 68 (1–4 Pt 1): 106-111
  • 18 Huda S, Rodriguez R, Lastra L , et al. Cortical activation during foot movements: II effect of movement rate and side. Neuroreport 2008; 19 (16) 1573-1577
  • 19 Orr EL, Lacourse MG, Cohen MJ, Cramer SC. Cortical activation during executed, imagined, and observed foot movements. Neuroreport 2008; 19 (6) 625-630
  • 20 Weiller C, Jüptner M, Fellows S , et al. Brain representation of active and passive movements. Neuroimage 1996; 4 (2) 105-110
  • 21 Ogg RJ, Laningham FH, Clarke D , et al. Passive range of motion functional magnetic resonance imaging localizing sensorimotor cortex in sedated children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2009; 4 (4) 317-322