Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2015; 47(03): 171-174
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1548847
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Treatment of Proximal Scaphoid Non-union by Resection of the Proximal Pole and Palmaris Longus Interposition Arthroplasty

Behandlung der proximalen Skaphoidpseudarthrose durch Resektion des proximalen Pols und Interpositionsarthroplastik mit der Sehne des M. palmaris longus
F. Smeraglia
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Federico II, Napoli, Italy
,
G. Ciaramella
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Federico II, Napoli, Italy
,
S. Cerbasi
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Federico II, Napoli, Italy
,
G. Balato
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Federico II, Napoli, Italy
,
M. Mariconda
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Federico II, Napoli, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 07 March 2014

accepted 12 March 2015

Publication Date:
17 June 2015 (online)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term clinical and radiographic outcome in a group of patients treated with resection of the proximal pole and tendon ball arthroplasty because of a scaphoid non-union.

Patients and Methods: 15 patients affected by scaphoid non-union and treated with resection arthroplasty were studied at a mean follow-up of 9.1 years. The assessment included a visual analogue scale (VAS) to evaluate pain, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and the measurement of grip and pinch strength. We also evaluated pre-operative and follow-up radiographs to determine the stage of SNAC wrist.

Results: We obtained a good subjective clinical result in 11 patients and a poor result in 4. Mean VAS and DASH score at follow-up was 1.2±1.2 and 12±12,1, respectively. Grip and key pinch strength in the surgically treated hand were 89% of the contralateral hand. There was significant increase in the SNAC stage at follow-up with respect to the preoperative evaluation in the operated wrist.

Conclusion: Resection of the proximal pole and tendon ball arthroplasty provided long-term relief of pain and good functional results in most patients affected by scaphoid non-union. This technique did not affect the natural history of SNAC wrist with its clinical and functional consequences.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Ziel der Studie war es, das langfristige klinische und radiografische Ergebnis der Behandlung einer proximalen Kahnbeinpseudarthrose mittels Ersatz des proximalen Pols durch Interposition eines Sehnenballes zu ermitteln.

Patienten und Methoden: 15 Patienten, bei denen bei einer Kahnbeinpseudarthrose der proximale Pol reseziert und durch einen Sehnenball ersetzt worden war, konnten im Mittel nach 9,1 Jahren erneut untersucht werden. Neben der Messung der Grob- und Feingriffstärke wurden die Schmerzen mit der visuellen Analogskala (VAS) und die Einschränkung der Gebrauchsfähigkeit der oberen Extremität mit dem DASH-Fragebogen ermittelt. Weiterhin erfolgte eine Auswertung der präoperativen und der bei der Nachuntersuchung gefertigten Röntgenaufnahmen.

Ergebnisse: 11 Patienten erzielten subjektiv ein gutes klinisches Resultat, 4 ein schlechtes. Die mittleren VAS- und DASH-Werte bei der Nachuntersuchung lagen bei 1.2±1.2 bzw. 12±12,1. Grob- und Feingriffstärke betrugen 89% der kontralateralen Hand. Radiologisch fand sich eine signifikante Verschlechterung bei der Nachuntersuchung im Vergleich zur präoperativen Untersuchung.

Schlussfolgerung: Der Ersatz des proximalen Kahnbeinpoles mit einem Sehnenball bei proximaler Kahnbeinpseudarthrose führt bei den meisten Patienten zu langfristiger Schmerzlinderung und guten funktionalen Resultaten. Die Entwicklung eines karpalen Kollaps mit den sich daraus ergebenden Konsequenzen lässt sich jedoch nicht verhindern.

 
  • References

  • 1 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH [Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 602-608
  • 2 Krimmer H, Kraphol B, Saurbier M et al. Der posttraumatische karpale Kollaps (SLAC- und SNAC-wrist) – Stadieneinteilung und therapeutische Möglichkeiten. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1997; 29: 228-233
  • 3 Cooney WP, Linscheid RL, Dobyns JH. Scaphoid fracture. Problems assiociated with nonunion and avascular necrosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1984; 15: 381-391
  • 4 Munk B, Larsen CF. Bone grafting the scaphoid non unions: a systematic review of 147 publications including 5246 cases of scaphoid non unions. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75: 618-629
  • 5 Chang MA, Bishop AT, Moran SL et al. The outcomes and complications of 1,2-intracompartmentalsupraretinacular artery pedicled vascularized bone grafts of scaphoid nonunions. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31: 387-396
  • 6 Boyer MI, Von Shroeder HP, Axelrod TS. Scaphoid nonunion with avascular necrosis of the proximal pole. Treatment with a vascularized bone graft from the dorsum of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Br 1998; 23: 686-690
  • 7 Jessu M, Wavreille G, Strouk G et al. Scaphoid non union trated by Kuhlmann’s vascularized bone graft: radiographic outcome and complication. Chir Main 2008; 27: 86-96
  • 8 Gabl M, Reinhart C, Lutz M et al. Vascularized bone graft from the iliac crest for the treatment of the proximal part of the scaphoid with an avascular fragment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 1414-1428
  • 9 Jones Jr DB, Burger H, Bishop AT et al. Treatment of scaphoid waist nonunions with an avascular proximal pole and carpal collapse: a comparison of two vascularized bone graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 2616-2625
  • 10 Garcia Elias M, Lluch A. Partial excision of the scaphoid: is it ever indicated?. Hand Clin 2001; 17: 687-695
  • 11 Gras M, Wahegaonkar AL, Mathoulin C. Treatment of avascular necrosis of the proximal pole of the scaphoid by arthroscopic resection and prosthetic semireplacement arthroplasty using the scaphoid implant (APSI): long term functional outcomes. J Wrist Surg 2012; 1: 159-164
  • 12 Qvik LI, Wilhelm KH. Tendon interposition arthroplasty after resection of necrotic carpal bone. Aust N Z J Surg 1980; 50: 272-277
  • 13 Eaton RG, Akelman E, Eaton BH. Fascial implant arthroplasty for treatment of radioscaphoid degenerative disease. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14: 766-774
  • 14 Mariconda M, Soscia E, Sirignano C et al. Long-term clinical results and MRI changes after tendon ball arthroplasty for advanced Kienbock’s disease. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2013; 38: 508-514
  • 15 Daruwalla ZJ, Davies KL, Shafighian A et al. An alternative treatment option for scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) and radioscaphoid osteoarthritis: early results of prospective study on the pyrocarbon adaptive proximal scaphoid impant (APSI). Ann Acad Med Singap 2013; 42: 278-284
  • 16 Mulford JS, Ceulemans LJ, Nam D et al. Proximal row carpectomy vs four corner fusion for scapholunate (Slac) or scaphoid non union advanced collapse (Snac) wrist: a systematic review of outcomes. J Hand Surg Eur 2009; 34: 256-263
  • 17 Merrel GA, Dermott EM, Weiss AP. Four corner arthrodesis using a circular plate and distal radius bone grafting: a conservative case series. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33: 635-642
  • 18 Green DP. The effect of avascular necrosis on Russe bone grafting for scaphoid nonunions. J Hand Surg Am 1985; 10: 597-605