Download PDF
Dialyse aktuell 2014; 18(7): 366-375
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1394095
Dialyse
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Der PD-Katheter – Welcher, wann und wie?

PD catheter – Which, when and how to insert?
Thomas Mettang
1   Fachbereich Nephrologie, DKD Helios Kliniken Wiesbaden
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 October 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zur Durchführung der Peritonealdialyse kommen verschiedene, meist aus Silikon gefertigte Katheter zum Einsatz. Die Katheter unterscheiden sich in Form, Länge und der Anzahl sogenannter Cuffs. Manche Katheter weisen im Bereich des intraperitonealen Anteiles Distanzringe auf. Augenblicklich kann davon ausgegangen werden, dass die auf dem Markt befindlichen Katheter medizinisch gleichwertig sind, auch wenn Metaanalysen einen Vorteil der gestreckten gegenüber den gecurlten Modellen aufzuzeigen scheinen. PD-Katheter können auf verschiedene Weise implantiert werden. Das am häufigsten genutzte Verfahren ist die offene chirurgische Implantation. Mittlerweile werden auch viele PD-Katheter laparoskopisch oder laparoskopisch-assistiert implantiert. Viele verschiedene Varianten der operativen Vorgehensweise sind beschrieben. Die meisten der bislang durchgeführten Untersuchungen belegen hinsichtlich des Katheterüberlebens bzw. katheterassoziierter Komplikationen eine Gleichwertigkeit der Implantationsverfahren. Wenn auch nicht zwingend, so sollte der Zeitpunkt der Katheterimplantation nach Möglichkeit so gewählt werden, dass mindestens 2 Wochen bis zur Aufnahme der Dialysebehandlung zugewartet werden kann („break-in period“).

Peritoneal dialysis treatment requires the insertion of a peritoneal catheter. Available catheters are mostly made of silicon and differ in size, design and the number of cuffs. In some catheters, discs are fixed to the proximal part to allow spatial distance to the surrounding bowel. So far, different designs of PD catheters do not influence catheter survival or complications, although some meta-analyses do suggest that straight catheters do better than curled ones. There are different ways for PD catheter implantation. Most frequently, open surgery is used. However, there is growing experience in laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted techniques. No advantage regarding catheter survival or complications of one over the other technique could clearly be shown so far. If ever possible, timing of implantation should allow for a 2 weeks break-in period to ensure proper healing and to avoid early mechanical complications.

Key words

peritoneal dialysis - catheter - insertion - cuff - surgery
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Xie J, Kiryluk K, Ren H et al. Coiled versus straight peritoneal dialysis catheters: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2011; 58: 946-955
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hagen SM, Lafranca JA, Ijzermans JN et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of peritoneal dialysis catheter type on complication rate and catheter survival. Kidney Int 2014; 84: 920-932
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Sikaneta T, Cheung KM, Abdolell M et al. The Toronto Western Hospital catheter: one center's experience and review of the literature. Int J Artif Organs 2006; 29: 59-63
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Ash SR. Chronic peritoneal dialysis catheters: overview of design, placement, and removal procedures. Semin Dial 2003; 16: 323-334
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Vaccarisi S, Spadafora N, Bonaiuto E et al. Laparoscopic placement of “self-locating catheter”: our experience and areview of literature. Transplant Proc 2012; 44: 1873-1875
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Russo R, Conte M, Corciulo R. Difficulties in removing the self-locating peritoneal catheter. Perit Dial Int 2011; 31: 500-502
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Crabtree JH, Burchette RJ, Siddiqi NA. Optimal peritoneal dialysis catheter type and exit site location: an anthropometric analysis. ASAIO J 2005; 51: 743-747
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Warady BA, Bakkaloglu S, Newland J et al. Consensus guidelines for the prevention and treatment of catheter-related infections and peritonitis in pediatric patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: 2012 update. Perit Dial Int 2012; 32 (Suppl. 02)
    Google Scholar
  • 9 de la Cruz MC, Dimkovic N, Bargman JM et al. Is catheter function influenced by the side of the body in which the peritoneal dialysis catheter is placed?. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21: 526-526
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Gadallah MF, Ramdeen G, Mignone J et al. Role of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing postoperative peritonitis in newly placed peritoneal dialysis catheters. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36: 1014-1014
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Piraino B, Bailie GR, Bernardini J. ISPD Ad Hoc Advisory Committee. Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2005 update. Perit Dial Int 2005; 25: 107-131
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kao CY, Chuang JH, Lee SY. A new simplified one-port laparoscopic technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. Perit Dial Int 2014; 34: 109-113
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Maio R, Figueiredo N, Costa P. Laparoscopic placement of Tenckhoff catheters for peritoneal dialysis: a safe, effective and reproducible procedure. Perit Dial Int 2008; 28: 170-173
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Manouras AJ, Kekis PB, Stamou KM et al. Laparoscopic placement of Oreopoulos-Zellerman catheters in CAPD patients. Perit Dial Int 2004; 24: 252-255
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Carrillo SA, Ghersi MM, Unger SW. Laparoscopic-assisted peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: a microinvasive technique. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 825-825
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mettang T, Krumme B, Wilhelm A, Duschka L. Endoscopic transluminal insertion of a peritoneal dialysis catheter. Perit Dial Int 2010; 30: 63-65
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tiong HY, Poh J, Sunderaraj K et al. Surgical complications of Tenckhoff catheters used in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Singapore Med J 2006; 47: 707-711
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Bunker D, Ilie V, Fisher D. Laparoscopic Tenckhoff catheter insertion: a retrospective study over 6 years. ANZ J Surg 2014; 84: 73-77
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gadallah MF, Pervez A, el-Shahawy MA et al. Peritoneoscopic versus surgical placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a prospective randomized study on outcome. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 33: 118-122
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Jwo SC, Chen KS, Lee CC, Chen HY. Prospective randomized study for comparison of open surgery with laparoscopic-assisted placement of Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter--a single center experience and literature review. J Surg Res 2010; 159: 489-496
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Park YS, Min SI, Kim DK et al. The outcomes of percutaneous versus open placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters. World J Surg 2014; 38: 1058-1064
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Figueiredo A, Goh BL, Jenkins S et al. International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal access. Perit Dial Int 2010; 30: 424-429
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Strippoli GF, Tong A, Johnson D et al. Catheter type, placement and insertion techniques for preventing peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD 004680 2004; 18
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Liu Y, Zhang L, Lin A et al. Impact of break-in period on the short-term outcomes of patients started on peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2014; 34: 49-56
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar