Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2014; 30(04): 394-404
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383551
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Deep Plane Facelifting for Facial Rejuvenation

Neil Gordon
1   Section of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
,
Stewart Adam
1   Section of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 July 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide the facial plastic surgeon with anatomical and embryologic evidence to support the use of the deep plane technique for optimal treatment of facial aging. A detailed description of the procedure is provided to allow safe and consistent performance. Insights into anatomical landmarks, technical nuances, and alternative approaches for facial variations are presented. The following points will be further elucidated in the article. The platysma muscle/submuscular aponeurotic system/galea are the continuous superficial cervical fascia encompassing the majority of facial fat, and this superficial soft tissue envelope is poorly anchored to the face. The deep cervical fascia binds the structural aspects of the face and covers the facial nerve and buccal fat pad. Facial aging is mainly due to gravity's long-term effects on the superficial soft tissue envelope, with more subtle effects on the deeper structural compartments. The deep plane is the embryologic cleavage plane between these fascial layers, and is the logical place for facial dissection. The deep plane allows access to the buccal fat pad for treatment of jowling. Soft tissue mobilization is maximized in deep plane dissections and requires careful hairline planning. Flap advancement creates tension only at the fascia level allowing natural, tension-free skin closure, and long-lasting outcomes. The deep plane advancement flap is well vascularized and resistant to complications.

Keywords

deep plane - facelift - rhytidectomy - aging face
 

  • References

  • 1 Shaw Jr RB, Katzel EB, Koltz PF , et al. Aging of the facial skeleton: aesthetic implications and rejuvenation strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (1) 374-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Fitzgerald R, Graivier MH, Kane M , et al. Update on facial aging. Aesthet Surg J 2010; 30 (Suppl): 11S-24S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58 (1) 80-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Skoog TG. Plastic surgery: The Aging Face. In: Skoog TG, , ed. Plastic surgery: new methods and refinements. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1974: 300-330
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (1) 53-61 , discussion 62–63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Furnas DW. The retaining ligaments of the cheek. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83 (1) 11-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Raskin E, Latrenta GS. Why do we age in our cheeks?. Aesthet Surg J 2007; 27 (1) 19-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gordon NA . Revision rhytidectomy: technique, modifications, and indications. Presented at: the 10th International Symposium on Facial Plastic Surgery & American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; April 29, 2010; Hollywood, FL
    PubMed
  • 9 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (7) 2219-2227 , discussion 2228–2231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Barton Jr FE. Rhytidectomy and the nasolabial fold. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (4) 601-607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gordon NA, Rosenberg R. Deep plane rhytidectomy: technical modifications, nuances, and observations, a 17 year experience. Presented at: Master's seminars AAFPRS annual meeting; September 5, 2012; Washington, DC
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Brennan HG, Koch RJ. Management of aging neck. Facial Plast Surg 1996; 12 (3) 241-255
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (1) 1-13
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Hamra ST. Composite Rhytidectomy. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Yousif NJ, Gosain A, Matloub HS, Sanger JR, Madiedo G, Larson DL. The nasolabial fold: an anatomic and histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (1) 60-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Owsley JQ. Lifting the malar fat pad for correction of prominent nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91 (3) 463-474 , discussion 475–476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Whetzel TP, Mathes SJ. The arterial supply of the face lift flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (2) 480-486 , discussion 487–488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Schuster RH, Gamble WB, Hamra ST, Manson PN. A comparison of flap vascular anatomy in three rhytidectomy techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95 (4) 683-690
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Parikh SS, Jacono AA. Deep-plane face-lift as an alternative in the smoking patient. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (4) 283-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Grover R, Jones BM, Waterhouse N. The prevention of haematoma following rhytidectomy: a review of 1078 consecutive facelifts. Br J Plast Surg 2001; 54 (6) 481-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Zoumalan RA, Rosenberg DB. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus—positive surgical site infections in face-lift surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008; 10 (2) 116-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rees TD, Liverett DM, Guy CL. The effect of cigarette smoking on skin-flap survival in the face lift patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73 (6) 911-915
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Gordon NA, Godin M, Johnson CM. The deep plane rhytidectomy: technique, modifications and outcome of three hundred cases. Presented at: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Annual Meeting; September 27, 1996; Washington, DC
    PubMedGoogle Scholar