Is Nerve Regeneration after Reconstruction with Collagen Nerve Conduits Terminated after 12 months? The Long-Term Follow-Up of Two Prospective Clinical Studies

Abstract

Background Long-term follow-up data of digital nerve reconstructions with nerve conduits are limited. Furthermore, it is not known whether nerve regeneration after tubulization is terminated after 12 months, or whether improvement can be expected after this period of time. Therefore, we present the long-term follow-up of two prospective clinical trials.

Patients and Methods We invited 45 patients who were enrolled in two prospective clinical trials for long-term follow-up. All patients underwent digital nerve reconstruction with conduits made from bovine collagen I due to a gap length of < 26 mm. Sensibility was assessed using static and moving two-point discrimination and monofilament testing. Follow-up data of 1 week, 3, 6, and 12 months, and the current examination were available. Improvement of sensibility was investigated by comparison of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand classification score at 12-month follow-up with the score raised at current examination.

Results We examined 20 reconstructed nerves in 16 patients with a mean follow-up of 58.1 months (range, 29.3–93.3 months). We found an improved sensibility at current follow-up compared with the 12-month follow-up in 13 cases. Three cases had the same values whereas four cases had worsened sensibility. Improvement of sensibility was associated with a significantly shorter nerve gap length with significantly better results if the gap length was < 10 mm.

Conclusion Our results provide evidence that the long-term recovery of sensibility after digital nerve tubulization depends on the nerve gap length with better results in those < 10 mm. Nerve regeneration after tubulization seems not to be terminated after 12 months.

Keywords

nerve injury - digital nerve reconstruction - nerve regeneration - nerve conduit - collagen I conduit - hand

• References

• 1 Noble J, Munro CA, Prasad VS, Midha R. Analysis of upper and lower extremity peripheral nerve injuries in a population of patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma 1998; 45 (1) 116-122
• 2 Renner A, Cserkuti F, Hankiss J. Late results after nerve transplantation on the upper extremities [in German]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2004; 36 (1) 13-18
• 3 Rosberg HE, Carlsson KS, Höjgård S, Lindgren B, Lundborg G, Dahlin LB. Injury to the human median and ulnar nerves in the forearm—analysis of costs for treatment and rehabilitation of 69 patients in southern Sweden. J Hand Surg [Br] 2005; 30 (1) 35-39
• 4 Jaquet JB, Luijsterburg AJ, Kalmijn S, Kuypers PD, Hofman A, Hovius SE. Median, ulnar, and combined median-ulnar nerve injuries: functional outcome and return to productivity. J Trauma 2001; 51 (4) 687-692
• 5 McAllister RM, Gilbert SE, Calder JS, Smith PJ. The epidemiology and management of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries in modern practice. J Hand Surg [Br] 1996; 21 (1) 4-13
• 6 de Medinaceli L, Prayon M, Merle M. Percentage of nerve injuries in which primary repair can be achieved by end-to-end approximation: review of 2,181 nerve lesions. Microsurgery 1993; 14 (4) 244-246
• 7 Taras JS, Jacoby SM, Lincoski CJ. Reconstruction of digital nerves with collagen conduits. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (9) 1441-1446
• 8 Bertleff MJ, Meek MF, Nicolai JP. A prospective clinical evaluation of biodegradable neurolac nerve guides for sensory nerve repair in the hand. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30 (3) 513-518
• 9 Thomsen L, Bellemere P, Loubersac T, Gaisne E, Poirier P, Chaise F. Treatment by collagen conduit of painful post-traumatic neuromas of the sensitive digital nerve: a retrospective study of 10 cases. Chir Main 2010; 29 (4) 255-262
• 10 Battiston B, Geuna S, Ferrero M, Tos P. Nerve repair by means of tubulization: literature review and personal clinical experience comparing biological and synthetic conduits for sensory nerve repair. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (4) 258-267
• 11 Lohmeyer JA, Kern Y, Schmauss D , et al. Prospective Clinical Study on Digital Nerve Repair with Collagen Nerve Conduits and Review of Literature. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013;
• 12 Lohmeyer JA, Siemers F, Machens HG, Mailänder P. The clinical use of artificial nerve conduits for digital nerve repair: a prospective cohort study and literature review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2009; 25 (1) 55-61
• 13 Archibald SJ, Krarup C, Shefner J, Li ST, Madison RD. A collagen-based nerve guide conduit for peripheral nerve repair: an electrophysiological study of nerve regeneration in rodents and nonhuman primates. J Comp Neurol 1991; 306 (4) 685-696
• 14 Dellon AL, Kallman CH. Evaluation of functional sensation in the hand. J Hand Surg Am 1983; 8 (6) 865-870
• 15 Paprottka FJ, Wolf P, Harder Y , et al. Sensory recovery outcome after digital nerve repair in relation to different reconstructive techniques: meta-analysis and systematic review. Plast Surg Int 2013; 2013: 704589
• 16 Stang F, Stollwerck P, Prommersberger KJ, van Schoonhoven J. Posterior interosseus nerve vs. medial cutaneous nerve of the forearm: differences in digital nerve reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133 (6) 875-880
• 17 Weber RA, Breidenbach WC, Brown RE, Jabaley ME, Mass DP. A randomized prospective study of polyglycolic acid conduits for digital nerve reconstruction in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (5) 1036-1045 , discussion 1046–1048
• 18 Rinker B, Liau JY. A prospective randomized study comparing woven polyglycolic acid and autogenous vein conduits for reconstruction of digital nerve gaps. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (5) 775-781
• 19 Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL. Clinical nerve reconstruction with a bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid tube. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 85 (3) 419-424
• 20 Haug A, Bartels A, Kotas J, Kunesch E. Sensory recovery 1.  year after bridging digital nerve defects with collagen tubes. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (1) 90-97
• 21 Meek MF, Coert JH. Recovery of two-point discrimination function after digital nerve repair in the hand using resorbable FDA- and CE-approved nerve conduits. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (10) 1307-1315
• 22 Konofaos P, Ver Halen JP. Nerve repair by means of tubulization: past, present, future. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (3) 149-164
• 23 Chiriac S, Facca S, Diaconu M, Gouzou S, Liverneaux P. Experience of using the bioresorbable copolyester poly(DL-lactide-ε-caprolactone) nerve conduit guide Neurolac™ for nerve repair in peripheral nerve defects: report on a series of 28 lesions. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37 (4) 342-349
• 24 Mackinnon SE, Dellon AE. Surgery of the Peripheral Nerve. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Thieme; 1988
• 25 ASfSot Hand. The Hand: Examination and Diagnosis. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1990
• 26 Lohmeyer JA, Hülsemann W, Mann M, Schmauß D, Machens HG, Habenicht R. Return of sensitivity after digital nerve reconstruction in children: how does age affect outcome? [in German]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2013; 45 (5) 265-270