Integrating the iPad into an Intensive, Comprehensive Aphasia Program

Abstract

The proliferation of tablet technology and the development of apps to support aphasia rehabilitation offer increasing opportunities for speech-language pathologists in a clinical setting. This article describes the components of an Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Program at Boston University and details how usage of the iPad (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA) was incorporated. We describe how the iPad was customized for use in individual, dyadic, and group treatment formats and how its use was encouraged through home practice tasks. In addition to providing the participants with step-by-step instructions for the usage of each new app, participants had multiple opportunities for practice across various treatment formats. Examples of how the participants continued using their iPad beyond the program suggest how the usage of this device has generalized into their day-to-day life. An overall summary of performance on targeted linguistic measures as well as an analysis of functional and quality-of-life measures reveal statistically significant improvements pre- to posttreatment.

Keywords

Aphasia - treatment - iPad - ICAP - interdisciplinary

• References

• 1 Holland AL, Weinberg P, Dittelman J. How to use apps clinically in the treatment of aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 2012; 33 (3) 223-233
• 2 King JM. Supporting communication with technology. In: Simmons-Mackie N, King JM, Beukelman DR, , eds. Supporting Communication for Adults with Acute and Chronic Aphasia. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing; 2013: 73-97
• 3 Sutton M. App-titude: apps to aid aphasia. The ASHA Leader; 2012
• 4 McCall D. Steps to success with technology for individuals with aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 2012; 33 (3) 234-242
• 5 Rose ML, Cherny LR, Worrall LE. Intensive comprehensive aphasia programs: An international survey of practice. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2013; 20 (5) 379-387
• 6 LPAA Project Group, Chapey R, Duchan J, Elman R, Garcia L, Kagan A, Lyon J, Simmons-Mackie N. Life participation approach to aphasia: a statement of values for the future. In: Chapey R, , ed. Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2008: 279-289
• 7 Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36 (2) 338-350
• 8 Caplan D, Bub D. Psycholinguistic assessment of aphasia. Mini-seminar presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; Seattle, WA; November, 1990
• 9 Roach A, Schwartz MF, Martin N, Grewal Rs, Brecher A. The Philadelphia Naming Test: scoring and rationale. Clinical Aphasiology 1996; 24: 121-133
• 10 Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary. 3rd. ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006: 499-526
• 11 Brookshire RH, Nicholas LE. The Discourse Comprehension Test. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders/The Psychological Corporation; 1997
• 12 Kagan A, Simmons-Mackie N, Rowland A , et al. Assessment for Living with Aphasia. Toronto, ON: Aphasia Institute; 2010
• 13 Frattali CM, Thompson CK, Holland AL, Wohl CB, Ferketic MM. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adults. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 1995
• 14 Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999; 30 (10) 2131-2140
• 15 Beukelman D, Garrett K, Yorkston K. Augmentative Communication Strategies for Adults with Acute and Chronic Medical Conditions. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing; 2007
• 16 Beeson PM. Treating acquired writing impairment: strengthening graphemic representations. Aphasiology 1999; 13: 367-386
• 17 Holland AL, Halper AS, Cherney LR. Tell me your story: analysis of script topics selected by persons with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2010; 19 (3) 198-203
• 18 Leonard C, Rochon E, Laird L. Treating naming impairments in aphasia: findings from a phonological components analysis treatment. Aphasiology 2008; 22 (9) 923-947
• 19 Thompson CK, Shapiro LP. Treating agrammatic aphasia within a linguistic framework: Treatment of Underlying Forms. Aphasiology 2005; 19 (10-11) 1021-1036
• 20 Davis GA, Wilcox MJ. Incorporating parameters of natural conversation in aphasia treatment. In: Chapey R, , ed. Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1981
• 21 Boyle M. Semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2004; 13 (3) 236-249
• 22 Edmonds LA, Nadeau SE, Kiran S. Effect of verb network strengthening treatment (VNeST) on lexical retrieval of content words in sentences in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology 2009; 23 (3) 402-424
• 23 Pulvermüller F, Neininger B, Elbert T , et al. Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32 (7) 1621-1626
• 24 Hoover EL, Kaplan JH. Starting an Aphasia Center in an Academic Setting: A Review of the First Years. Seminar presentation at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association; New Orleans, LA; November, 2009
• 25 Elman R, Bernstein-Ellis E. Aphasia book clubs: Making the connection. Stroke Connection 2006. ; May/June, 32-33