Zentralbl Chir 2014; 139(4): 406-410
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1360120
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Mittlere gastrointestinale Blutung – die Endoskopie bringt Licht ins Dunkel

Mid-Gastrointestinal Bleeding – Endoscopy Sheds Light in the Darkness
A. May
Klinik für Innere Medizin II: Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Endokrinologie, Pneumologie, HSK Wiesbaden, Deutschland
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
07. Januar 2014 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die mittlere gastrointestinale Blutung (MGI) ist als eine Blutung definiert, deren Blutungsquelle im Dünndarm lokalisiert ist, und stellt die häufigste Indikation zur Dünndarmendoskopie dar. Die intraoperative Enteroskopie galt über Jahrzehnte als Goldstandard. Mit Einführung der Dünndarmendoskopietechniken spielen diese heutzutage die zentrale Rolle, während die intraoperative Enteroskopie ein Reserveverfahren für selektionierte Patienten geworden ist. Aktuell stehen neben der rein diagnostischen Kapselendoskopie 5 nichtchirurgische flexible Enteroskopietechniken zur Verfügung. In Deutschland und Europa werden hauptsächlich die ballonassistierten Enteroskopietechniken (Doppelballon- und Singleballonenteroskopie) eingesetzt. Die Doppelballonenteroskopie (DBE) wurde als erste flexible Enteroskopietechnik eingeführt und hat sich weltweit etabliert. Für die DBE stehen die meisten Studienergebnisse zur Verfügung und sie ist die Technik mit der höchsten Rate an kompletten Enteroskopien. Dennoch sind technische Weiterentwicklungen, welche die Dünndarmendoskopie schneller und einfacher machen, wünschenswert. Bei Patienten mit chronischer MGI oder problematischen Patienten empfiehlt sich die Kapselendoskopie als Screeningverfahren. Bei der akuten MGI ist der flexiblen Enteroskopie aufgrund der hohen diagnostischen Ausbeute und der endoskopischen Therapiemöglichkeit der Vorzug zu geben. In problematischen Fällen oder wenn endoskopisch kein Erfolg zu erzielen ist, haben diagnostisch die CT-Angiografie und therapeutisch die konventionelle Angiografie mit Embolisation ihren Stellenwert.

Abstract

Mid-gastrointestinal bleeding is defined as a bleeding of the small bowel and is the most common indication for small bowel endoscopy. Intraoperative enteroscopy has been regarded as gold standard for a long time. With the introduction of different endoscopy techniques, they play now the central role, whereas intraoperative enteroscopy has become a reserve method for selected patients. Actually, there are, beside capsule endoscopy, five non-surgical, flexible enteroscopy techniques available. In Germany and Europe balloon-assisted enteroscopy (double balloon and single balloon enteroscopy) is mainly used. Double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is the “oldest” flexible enteroscopy technique and has become established throughout the world for diagnostic and therapeutic examinations of the small bowel. The majority of the studies have been performed with DBE and it provides the highest rate of complete enteroscopy. Nevertheless, technical improvements to make enteroscopy easier and faster are still required. In patients with chronic MGI or problematic situations capsule endoscopy is an ideal screening option. In case of acute MGI the flexible enteroscopy techniques should be preferred because of the high diagnostic yield combined with the possibility of endoscopic therapeutic interventions. In difficult cases with unsuccessful enteroscopy, CT angiography and conventional angiography with the option of embolisation had proved their value.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 May A, Nachbar L, Ell C. Double-balloon enteroscopy (push-and-pull enteroscopy) of the small bowel: feasibility and diagnostic and therapeutic yield in patients with suspected small bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 62-70
  • 2 Zhong J, Ma T, Zhang C et al. A retrospective study of the application on double-balloon enteroscopy in 378 patients with suspected small-bowel diseases. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 208-215
  • 3 Ell C, May A. Mid-gastrointestinal bleeding: capsule endoscopy and push-and-pull enteroscopy give rise to a new medical term. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 73-75
  • 4 Pasha SF, Hara AK, Leighton JA et al. Diagnostic evaluation and management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a changing paradigm. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY) 2009; 5: 839-850
  • 5 Lee SS, Oh TS, Kim HJ et al. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: diagnostic performance of multidetector CT enterography. Radiology 2011; 259: 739-748
  • 6 Hansmann J, Eichholz J. Radiologische Diagnostik des Dünndarms. Radiologe 2012; 52: 849-866
  • 7 Kwak HS, Han YM, Lee ST et al. The clinical outcomes of transcatheter microcoil embolization in patients with active lower gastrointestinal bleeding in the small bowel. Korean J Radiol 2009; 10: 391-397
  • 8 Hartmann D, Schmidt H, Bolz G et al. A prospective two-center study comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with intraoperative enteroscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 826-832
  • 9 Bonnet S, Douard R, Malamut G et al. Intraoperative enteroscopy in the management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45: 277-284
  • 10 Aktas H, Mensink PB. Small bowel diagnostics: current place of small bowel endoscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2012; 26: 209-220
  • 11 Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A et al. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature 2000; 405 (6785) 417
  • 12 May A, Albert J, Moog G et al. Update des Positionspapiers der Sektion Endoskopie der DGVS. Z Gastroenterol 2010; 48: 1384-1404
  • 13 Taylor AC, Chen RY, Desmond PV. Use of an overtube for enteroscopy – does it increase depth of insertion? A prospective study of enteroscopy with and without an overtube. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 227-230
  • 14 Benz C, Jakobs R, Riemann JF. Do we need the overtube for push enteroscopy?. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 658-661
  • 15 May A, Nachbar L, Schneider M et al. Prospective comparison of push enteroscopy and push-and-pull enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2016-2024
  • 16 Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y et al. Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 216-220
  • 17 May A, Nachbar L, Wardak A et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy: preliminary experience in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding or chronic abdominal pain. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 985-991
  • 18 Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sunada K et al. Clinical outcomes of double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 1010-1016
  • 19 May A, Färber M, Aschmoneit I et al. Prospective multicenter trial comparing push-and-pull enteroscopy with single- and double-balloon techniques in patients with small-bowel disorders. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 575-581
  • 20 Xin L, Liao Z, Jiang YP et al. Indications, detectability, positive findings, total enteroscopy, and complications of diagnostic double-balloon endoscopy: a systematic review of data of the first decade of use. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 563-570
  • 21 Messer I, May A, Manner H et al. Prospective, randomized, single-center trial comparing double-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel disorders. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 241-249
  • 22 Tsujikawa T, Saitoh Y, Andoh A et al. Novel single-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of the small intestine: preliminary experiences. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 11-15
  • 23 Kav T, Balaban Y, Bayraktar Y. The power suction maneuver in single balloon enteroscopy. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 961-962
  • 24 May A, Nachbar L, Ell C. Push-and-pull enteroscopy using a single-balloon technique for difficult colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 395-398
  • 25 Takano N, Yamada A, Watabe H et al. Single-balloon versus double-balloon endoscopy for achieving total enteroscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 734-739
  • 26 Möschler O, May AD, Müller MK et al. DBE-Studiengruppe Deutschland. [Complications in double-balloon enteroscopy: results of the German DBE registry.]. Z Gastroenterol 2008; 46: 266-270
  • 27 Möschler O, May A, Müller MK et al. German DBE Study Group Complications in and performance of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE): results from a large prospective DBE database in Germany. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 484-489
  • 28 Gerson LB, Batenic MA, Newsom SL et al. Long-term outcomes after double-balloon enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 664-669
  • 29 Mensink P, Haringsma J, Kucharzik T et al. Complications of double balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter survey. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 613-615
  • 30 Witkin AS, Fenkel JM, Infantolino A et al. Spiral enteroscopy in geriatric patients: retrospective review of a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: AB371
  • 31 Mönkemüller K, Neumann H, Meyer F et al. A retrospective analysis of emergency double-balloon enteroscopy for small-bowel bleeding. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 715-717
  • 32 Ell C, Remke S, May A et al. The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 685-689
  • 33 Shishido T, Oka S, Tanaka S et al. Outcome of patients who have undergone total enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 666-672
  • 34 May A, Friesing-Sosnik T, Manner H et al. Long-term outcome after argon plasma coagulation of small-bowel lesions using double-balloon enteroscopy in patiens with mid-gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 759-765
  • 35 Samaha E, Rahmi G, Landi B et al. Long-term outcome of patients treated with double balloon enteroscopy for small bowel vascular lesions. Gastroenterology 2012; 107: 240-246
  • 36 Williamson JB, Judah JR, Gaidos JKJ et al. Prospective evaluation of the long-term outcomes after deep small-bowel spiral enteroscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 771-778