Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(07): 583-589
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358474
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Active vs. Passive Recovery During High-intensity Training Influences Hormonal Response

P. Wahl
1   Institute of Training Science and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne, Germany
2   Molecular and Cellular Sport Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Germany
3   The German Research Centre of Elite Sport, German Sport University Cologne, Germany
,
S. Mathes
1   Institute of Training Science and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne, Germany
,
S. Achtzehn
1   Institute of Training Science and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne, Germany
,
W. Bloch
2   Molecular and Cellular Sport Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Germany
3   The German Research Centre of Elite Sport, German Sport University Cologne, Germany
,
J. Mester
1   Institute of Training Science and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne, Germany
3   The German Research Centre of Elite Sport, German Sport University Cologne, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 30 September 2013

Publication Date:
20 November 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of active (A) vs. passive (P) recovery during high-intensity interval training on the acute hormonal and metabolic response. Twelve triathletes/cyclists performed four 4 min intervals on a cycle ergometer, either with A- or P-recovery between each bout. Testosterone, hGH, cortisol, VEGF, HGF and MIF were determined pre, 0′, 30′, 60′ and 180′ after both interventions. Metabolic perturbations were characterized by lactate, blood gas and spirometric analysis. A-recovery caused significant increases in circulating levels of cortisol, testosterone, T/C ratio, hGH, VEGF and HGF. Transient higher levels were found for cortisol, testosterone, hGH, VEGF, HGF and MIF after A-recovery compared to P-recovery, despite no differences in metabolic perturbations. A-recovery was more demanding from an athlete’s point of view. Based on the data of testosterone, hGH and the T/C-ratio, as well as on the data of VEGF and HGF it appears that this kind of exercise protocol with A-recovery phases between the intervals may promote anabolic processes and may lead to pro-angiogenic conditions more than with P-recovery. These data support the findings that also the long term effects of both recovery modes seem to differ, and that both can induce specific adaptations.

Key words

cortisol - testosterone - hGH - VEGF - MIF - HGF
 

  • References

  • 1 Ben AA, Zouhal H, Chamari K, Thevenet D, de Mullenheim PY, Gastinger S, Tabka Z, Prioux J. Effects of recovery mode (active vs. passive) on performance during a short high-intensity interval training program: a longitudinal study. Eur J Appl Physiol 2013; 113: 1373-1383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Conway K, Price P, Harding KG, Jiang WG. The molecular and clinical impact of hepatocyte growth factor, its receptor, activators, and inhibitors in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2006; 14: 2-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Dupont G, Moalla W, Matran R, Berthoin S. Effect of short recovery intensities on the performance during two Wingate tests. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 1170-1176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Enoki T, Yoshida Y, Lally J, Hatta H, Bonen A. Testosterone increases lactate transport, monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) 1 and MCT4 in rat skeletal muscle. J Physiol 2006; 577: 433-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fukumura D, Xu L, Chen Y, Gohongi T, Seed B, Jain RK. Hypoxia and acidosis independently up-regulate vascular endothelial growth factor transcription in brain tumors in vivo. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 6020-6024
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Galbo H. Influence of aging and exercise on endocrine function. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2001; 11 Suppl S49-S57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Godfrey RJ, Madgwick Z, Whyte GP. The exercise-induced growth hormone response in athletes. Sports Med 2003; 33: 599-613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gordon SE, Kraemer WJ, Vos NH, Lynch JM, Knuttgen HG. Effect of acid-base balance on the growth hormone response to acute high-intensity cycle exercise. J Appl Physiol 1994; 76: 821-829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gray AB, Telford RD, Weidemann MJ. Endocrine response to intense interval exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 1993; 66: 366-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Grieb G, Merk M, Bernhagen J, Bucala R. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF): a promising biomarker. Drug News Perspect 2010; 23: 257-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hackney AC, Hosick KP, Myer A, Rubin DA, Battaglini CL. Testosterone responses to intensive interval versus steady-state endurance exercise. J Endocrinol Invest 2012; 35: 947-950
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Haegele M, Zinner C, Wahl P, Sperlich B, Mester J. Aktiv oder Passiv – der Effekt unterschiedlicher Erholungsprotokolle nach hochintensivem Intervall-Training (HIT). Leistungssport 2009; 39: 10-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hill EE, Zack E, Battaglini C, Viru M, Viru A, Hackney AC. Exercise and circulating cortisol levels: the intensity threshold effect. J Endocrinol Invest 2008; 31: 587-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hunt TK, Aslam RS, Beckert S, Wagner S, Ghani QP, Hussain MZ, Roy S, Sen CK. Aerobically derived lactate stimulates revascularization and tissue repair via redox mechanisms. Antioxid Redox Signal 2007; 9: 1115-1124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kim HR, Park MK, Cho ML, Yoon CH, Lee SH, Park SH, Leng L, Bucala R, Kang I, Choe J, Kim HY. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor upregulates angiogenic factors and correlates with clinical measures in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 927-936
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kokalas N, Tsalis G, Tsigilis N, Mougios V. Hormonal responses to three training protocols in rowing. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 92: 128-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Hormonal responses and adaptations to resistance exercise and training. Sports Med 2005; 35: 339-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Miniero R, Altomare F, Rubino M, Matarazzo P, Montanari C, Petri A, Raiola G, Bona G. Effect of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) on hemoglobin concentration in children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency-related anemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2012; 34: 407-411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Morici G, Zangla D, Santoro A, Pelosi E, Petrucci E, Gioia M, Bonanno A, Profita M, Bellia V, Testa U, Bonsignore MR. Supramaximal exercise mobilizes hematopoietic progenitors and reticulocytes in athletes. Am J Physiol 2005; 289: R1496-R1503
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nakamura T, Sakai K, Nakamura T, Matsumoto K. Hepatocyte growth factor twenty years on: Much more than a growth factor. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011. 26. 188-202
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Schmidt A, Bierwirth S, Weber S, Platen P, Schinkothe T, Bloch W. Short intensive exercise increases the migratory activity of mesenchymal stem cells. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 195-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Scott CB. Contribution of anaerobic energy expenditure to whole body thermogenesis. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2005; 2: 14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sengupta S, Gherardi E, Sellers LA, Wood JM, Sasisekharan R, Fan TP. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor can induce angiogenesis independently of vascular endothelial growth factor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003; 23: 69-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Shahidi NT. A review of the chemistry, biological action, and clinical applications of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Clin Ther 2001; 23: 1355-1390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Spierer DK, Goldsmith R, Baran DA, Hryniewicz K, Katz SD. Effects of active vs. passive recovery on work performed during serial supramaximal exercise tests. Int J Sports Med 2004; 25: 109-114
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Tremblay MS, Copeland JL, Van Helder W. Influence of exercise duration on post-exercise steroid hormone responses in trained males. Eur J Appl Physiol 2005; 94: 505-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Van Beaumont W. Evaluation of hemoconcentration from hematocrit measurements. J Appl Physiol 1972; 32: 712-713
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Viru A, Viru M. Cortisol – essential adaptation hormone in exercise. Int J Sports Med 2004; 25: 461-464
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Wahl P, Haegele M, Zinner C, Bloch W, Mester J. High Intensity Training (HIT) für die Verbesserung der Ausdauerleistungsfähigkeit im Leistungssport. Schweiz Zeitschr Sportmed Sporttraumatol 2010; 58: 125-133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Wahl P, Hagele M, Zinner C, Bloch W, Mester J. High Intensity Training (HIT) for the improvement of endurance capacity of recreationally active people and in prevention & rehabilitation. Wien Med Wochenschr 2010; 160: 627-636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Wahl P, Zinner C, Achtzehn S, Behringer M, Bloch W, Mester J. Effects of acid-base balance and high or low intensity exercise on VEGF and bFGF. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 1405-1413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wahl P, Zinner C, Achtzehn S, Bloch W, Mester J. Effect of high- and low-intensity exercise and metabolic acidosis on levels of GH, IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and cortisol. Growth Horm IGF Res 2010; 20: 380-385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Wahl P, Zinner C, Grosskopf C, Rossmann R, Bloch W, Mester J. Passive recovery is superior to active recovery during a high-intensity shock microcycle. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 1384-1393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Wolfe RR. Control of muscle protein breakdown: effects of activity and nutritional states. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2001; 11: S164-S169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar