Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2013; 17(04): 162-167
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1356788
Schwerpunkt Schmerz
Vertiefung
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Wie beeinflusst Manuelle Therapie den Schmerz?

Annina Schmid
1   Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom, URL: www.neuro-research.ch
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 September 2013 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Diverse klinische Praxisrichtlinien empfehlen Manuelle Therapie nicht nur bei Bewegungseinschränkungen, sondern auch bei muskuloskeletalen Schmerzen [2], [55]. Dr. Annina Schmid interessiert sich für die Wirkungsweise von Manueller Therapie. In diesem Artikel fasst sie die drei Hauptwirkungsweisen zusammen, die eine Schmerzlinderung durch Manuelle Therapie erklären könnten.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Abbott JH, Patla CE, Jensen RH. The initial effects of an elbow mobilization with movement techniqü on grip strength in subjects with lateral epicondylalgia. Man Ther 2001; 6 (03) 163-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Airaksinen O et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain European Spine Journal 2006; 15 (Suppl. 02) 192-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Aquino RL et al. Applying Joint Mobilization at Different Cervical Vertebral Levels dös not Inflünce Immediate Pain Reduction in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Man Manip Ther 2009; 17 (02) 95-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bialosky JE et al. A randomized sham-controlled trial of a neurodynamic techniqü in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Orthopädic and Sports Physical Therapy 2009; 39 (10) 709-723
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bialosky JE et al. Spinal manipulative therapy has an immediate effect on thermal pain sensitivity in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Physical Therapy 2009; 89 (12) 1292-1303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bialosky JE et al. The influnce of expectation on spinal manipulation induced hypoalgesia: an experimental study in normal subjects. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 19-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bialosky JE et al. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model. Man Ther 2009; 14 (05) 531-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bialosky JE et al. The relationship of the audible pop to hypoalgesia associated with high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust manipulation: a secondary analysis of an experimental study in pain-free participants. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010; 33 (02) 117-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Brodersen KH et al. Decoding the perception of pain from fMRI using multivariate pattern analysis. Neuroimage 2012; 63 (03) 1162-1170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cassidy JD, Lopes AA, Yong-Hing K. The immediate effect of manipulation versus mobilization on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992; 15 (09) 570-575
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chiu T, Wright A. Comparing the effects of two cervical mobilisation techniqüs on sympathetic outflow to the upper limb in normal subjects. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal 1998; 16: 13-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chiu T, Wright A. To compare the effects of different rates of application of a cervical mobilisation techniqü on sympathetic outflow to the upper limb in normal subjects. Manual Therapy 1996; 1 (04) 198-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Coppieters MW et al. The immediate effects of a cervical lateral glide treatment techniqü in patients with neurogenic cervicobrachial pain. Journal of Orthopädic and Sports Physical Therapy 2003; a 33 (07) 369-378
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Coronado RA et al. Changes in pain sensitivity following spinal manipulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 2012; 22 (05) 752-767
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cramer G et al. Basic science research related to chiropractic spinal adjusting: the state of the art and recommendations revisited. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006; 29 (09) 726-761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 George SZ et al. Immediate effects of spinal manipulation on thermal pain sensitivity: an experimental study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 68-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Glover JR, Morris JG, Khosla T. Back pain: a randomized clinical trial of rotational manipulation of the trunk. British Journal of Industrial Medicine 1974; 31 (01) 59-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Haas M et al. Efficacy of cervical endplay assessment as an indicator for spinal manipulation. Spine 2003; 28 (11) 1091-1096
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Henderson CN. The basis for spinal manipulation: chiropractic perspective of indications and theory. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 2012; 22 (05) 632-642
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hsieh CY et al. Mulligan‘s mobilization with movement for the thumb: a single case report using magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate the positional fault hypothesis. Man Ther 2002; 7 (01) 44-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Iannetti GD, Mouraux A. From the neuromatrix to the pain matrix (and back). Exp Brain Res 2010; 205 (01) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kavanagh J. Is there a positional fault at the inferior tibiofibular joint in patients with acute or chronic ankle sprains compared to normals?. Man Ther 1999; 4 (01) 19-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Korr IM. Proprioceptors and somatic dysfunction. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1975; 74 (07) 638-650
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kulig K, Landel R, Powers CM. Assessment of lumbar spine kinematics using dynamic MRI: a proposed mechanism of sagittal plane motion induced by manual posterior-to-anterior mobilization. Journal of Orthopädic and Sports Physical Therapy 2004; 34 (02) 57-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lovick TA, Li P. Integrated function of neurones in the rostral ventrolateral medulla. Progress in Pain Research 1989; 81: 223-232
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lovick TA. Interactions between descending pathways from the dorsal and ventrolateral periaqüductal gray matter in teh rat. In: De Paulis A, Bandler R, Editors The midbrain periaqüductal gray matter. New York: Plenum Press; 1991
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Maigne JY, Vautravers P. Mechanism of action of spinal manipulative therapy. Joint, Bone, Spine 2003; 70 (05) 336-341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Maitland GD. Manipulation der Wirbelsäule. 2. Auflage. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 1994
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Malisza KL et al. Functional MRI involving painful stimulation of the ankle and the effect of physiotherapy joint mobilization. Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 21 (05) 489-496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Malisza KL et al. Functional MRI of the rat lumbar spinal cord involving painful stimulation and the effect of peripheral joint mobilization. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2003; 18 (02) 152-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 McCollam RL, Benson CJ. Effects of postero-anterior mobilization on lumbar extension and flexion. J of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 1993; 1: 134-141
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 McGregor AH, Wragg P, Gedroyc MW. Can interventional MRI provide an insight into the mechanics of a posterior-anterior mobilisation?. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2001; 16 (10) 926-929
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 McGuiness J, Vicenzino B, Wright A. Inflünce of a cervical mobilization techniqü on respiratory and cardiovascular function. Man Ther 1997; 2 (04) 216-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 McLean S et al. A pilot study of the manual force levels required to produce manipulation induced hypoalgesia. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002; 17 (04) 304-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Paungmali A et al. Hypoalgesic and sympathöxcitatory effects of mobilization with movement for lateral epicondylalgia. Physical Therapy 2003; 83 (04) 374-383
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Petersen N, Vicenzino B, Wright A. The effects of a cervical mobilisation techniqü on sympathetic outflow to the upper limb in normal subjects. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 1993; 9 (03) 149-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Pickar JG. Neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation. Spine Journal 2002; 2 (05) 357-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Price DD et al. Peripheral suppression of first pain and central summation of second pain evoked by noxious heat pulses. Pain 1977; 3 (01) 57-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Rolke R et al. Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials. Eur J Pain 2006; 10 (01) 77-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Roy RA, Boucher JP, Comtois AS. Inflammatory response following a short-term course of chiropractic treatment in subjects with and without chronic low back pain. J Chiropr Med 2010; 9 (03) 107-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Rubinstein SM et al. Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 9 CD008880
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Rubinstein SM et al. Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain: an update of a Cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36 (13) E825-E846
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Schafer A et al. Outcomes differ between subgroups of patients with low back and leg pain following neural manual therapy: a prospective cohort study. European Spine Journal 2011; 20 (03) 482-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Schafer A, Hall T, Briffa K. Classification of low back-related leg pain - a proposed patho-mechanism-based approach. Man Ther 2009; 14 (02) 222-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Schmid A et al. Paradigm shift in manual therapy?. Evidence for a central nervous system component in the response to passive cervical joint mobilisation Man Ther 2008; 13 05 387-396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Schmid AB et al. Effect of splinting and exercise on intraneural edema of the median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome-an MRI study to reveal therapeutic mechanisms. J Orthop Res 2012;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Schomacher J. The effect of an analgesic mobilization techniqü when applied at symptomatic or asymptomatic levels of the cervical spine in subjects with neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Man Manip Ther 2009; 17 02 101-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 So PS, Jiang Y, Qin Y. Touch therapies for pain relief in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (04) CD006535
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Soon BT et al. A crossover study on the effect of cervical mobilization on motor function and pressure pain threshold in pain-free individuals. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010; 33 (09) 652-658
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Sterling M, Jull G, Wright A. Cervical mobilisation: concurrent effects on pain, sympathetic nervous system activity and motor activity. Manual Therapy 2001; 6 (02) 72-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Sterling M. Kinästhetic exercise dös not improve outcome (or kinästhesia) in patients with acute whiplash. Aust J Physiother 2001; 47 (01) 67-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Teodorczyk-Injeyan JA, Injeyan HS, Rügg R. Spinal manipulative therapy reduces inflammatory cytokines but not substance P production in normal subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006; 29 (01) 14-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Terrett AC, Vernon H. Manipulation and pain tolerance. A controlled study of the effect of spinal manipulation on paraspinal cutaneous pain tolerance levels American Journal of Physical Medicine 1984; 63 05 217-225
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Tullberg T et al. Manipulation dös not alter the position of the sacroiliac joint. A röntgen stereophotogrammetric analysis Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23 10 1124-1128 discussion 1129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 van Tulder M et al. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care European Spine Journal 2006; 15 (Suppl. 02) S169-S191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Vernon H. Biological rationale for possible benefits of spinal manipulation. In: Chiropractic in the United States: training, practice and research. Cherkin CD, Mootz RD, Editors AHCPR Publication 1997 No 98-N002 105-117
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Vicenzino B. An Investigation of the effects of spinal manual therapy on forequarter pressure and thermal pain thresholds and sympathetic nervous system activity in asymptomatic subjects: a preliminary report. In: Moving in on pain. Shacklock M, Editor Australia: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Vicenzino B et al. An investigation of the interrelationship between manipulative therapy-induced hypoalgesia and sympathöxcitation. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 1998; b 21 (07) 448-453
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Vicenzino B et al. Cardiovascular and respiratory changes produced by lateral glide mobilization of the cervical spine. Manual Therapy 1998; a 3 (02) 67-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Vicenzino B. Mobilisation with Movement: the Art and the Science. Australia: Elsevier; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Vicenzino B et al. Specific manipulative therapy treatment for chronic lateral epicondylalgia produces uniqüly characteristic hypoalgesia. Man Ther 2001; 6 (04) 205-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Vicenzino B, Collins D, Wright A. Sudomotor changes induced by neural mobilisation techniqüs in asymptomatic subjects. The Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 1994; 2 (02) 66-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Vicenzino B, Collins D, Wright A. The initial effects of a cervical spine manipulative physiotherapy treatment on the pain and dysfunction of lateral epicondylalgia. Pain 1996; 68: 69-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Vicenzino B, Paungmali A, Teys P. Mulligan‘s mobilization-with-movement, positional faults and pain relief: current concepts from a critical review of literature. Man Ther 2007; 12 (02) 98-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Willett E, Hebron C, Krouwel O. The initial effects of different rates of lumbar mobilisations on pressure pain thresholds in asymptomatic subjects. Man Ther 2010; 15 (02) 173-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Williams NH et al. Psychological response in spinal manipulation (PRISM): a systematic review of psychological outcomes in randomised controlled trials. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 2007; 15 (04) 271-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Woolf CJ. Overcoming obstacles to developing new analgesics. Nature Medicine 2010; 16 (11) 1241-1247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Wright A. Hypoalgesia post-manipualtive therapy: a review of a potential neurophysiological mechanism. Manual Therapy 1995; (01) 11-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Wright A. Pain-Relieving Effects of Cervical Manual Therapy. In: Physical Therapy of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine. USA: Churchill Livingstone; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 70 Yang G, Crawford RC, Wang JH. Proliferation and collagen production of human patellar tendon fibroblasts in response to cyclic uniaxial stretching in serum-free conditions. Journal of Biomechanics 2004; 37 (10) 1543-1550
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Zusman M, Edwards B, Donaghy A. Investigation of a proposed mechanism of the relief of spinal pain with passive joint movement. Journall of Manual Medicine 1989; 4: 58-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Zusman M. There‘s something about passive movement. Medical Hypotheses 2010; 75 (01) 106-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar