Temporary Epicardial Pacemaker Wires: Significance of Position and Electrode Type

Abstract

Objective To determine the pacing and sensing properties of different temporary epicardial pacemaker electrodes after cardiac surgery depending on position at the heart and time after surgery.

Methods From September 2009 to October 2010, 60 patients undergoing cardiac surgery were prospectively randomized into two groups: group O: Osypka-electrodes (n = 30), group M: Medtronic-electrodes (n = 30). In position 1, the bipolar electrodes were inserted onto the anterior wall of the right ventricle and at the right atrial auricle, in position 2, onto the diaphragmal wall of the right ventricle and at the aortic aspect of the superior vena cava medial close to the atrium. Sensing values and pacing thresholds were measured for all electrodes during surgery, on day 1 and every second day up to day 10 after surgery.

Results In both groups, pacing thresholds (both positions) were higher during surgery (ventricle 3.1 ± 0.6 V, atrium 3.1 ± 0.3 V) than at day 1 (ventricle 2.4 ± 0.7 V, atrium 2.4 ± 0.3 V) and increased during the perioperative course until day 10 (ventricle 4.7 ± 1.0 V, atrium 4.9 ± 1.1 V, p = 0.04, p = 0.02). P and R wave amplitudes did not change over time (atrium 5.1 ± 0.1 mV initially, 4.2 ± 0.1 mV at removal (p = ns); ventricle 10.4 ± 0.2 mV vs. 10.1 ± 0.25 mV). Group M had better median pacing thresholds compared with group O (atrium: 2.9 ± 0.6 V vs. 3.9 ± 0.7 V, p = 0.04 and ventricle: 2.6 ± 0.6 V vs. 3.9 ± 0.6 V, p = 0.045). Atrial position 1 was superior to position 2 concerning pacing thresholds of Medtronic electrodes (2.1 ± 0.3 mV vs. 3.4 ± 0.4 mV, p = 0.02). Osypka-electrodes were easier to handle due to their more pliable texture.

Conclusions 1. Up to postoperative day 10, adequate pacing and sensing performance was achieved by both electrode types in each position. 2. Medtronic electrodes had better pacing thresholds in atrium and ventricle after day 5. 3. Positioning of pacemaker electrodes does not alter functionality. 4. Handling of Osypka electrodes was easier than that of Medtronic electrodes.

• References

• 1 Wirtz S, Schulte HD, Winter J, Godehardt E, Kunert J. Reliability of Different Myocardial Pacing Leads. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 37
• 2 Yiu P, Tansley P, Pepper JR. Improved reliability of post-operative ventricular pacing by use of bipolar temporary pacing leads. Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 9 (4) 391-395
• 3 Kallis P, Batrick N, Bindi F , et al. Pacing thresholds of temporary epicardial electrodes: variation with electrode type, time, and epicardial position. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57 (3) 623-626
• 4 Elmi F, Tullo NG, Khalighi K. Natural history and predictors of temporary epicardial pacemaker wire function in patients after open heart surgery. Cardiology 2002; 98 (4) 175-180
• 5 Breivik K, Engedal H, Resch F, Segadal L, Ohm OJ. Clinical and electrophysiological properties of a new temporary pacemaker lead after open-heart surgery. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1982; 5 (4) 600-606
• 6 Daoud EG, Dabir R, Archambeau M, Morady F, Strickberger SA. Randomized, double-blind trial of simultaneous right and left atrial epicardial pacing for prevention of post-open heart surgery atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2000; 102 (7) 761-765
• 7 Reade MC. Temporary epicardial pacing after cardiac surgery: a practical review: part 1: general considerations in the management of epicardial pacing. Anaesthesia 2007; 62 (3) 264-271
• 8 Aris A, Cámara ML, Padró JM, Oriol Bonnin J, Oriol Solé J, Caralps JM. Clinical evaluation of a new temporary pacemaker wire. Ann Thorac Surg 1983; 36 (2) 228-230
• 9 Robicsek F. A method to place temporary atrial pacing electrodes during heart surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983; 31 (5) 322-324
• 10 Kastor JA, Berkovits BV, DeSanctis RW. Variations in discharge rate of demand pacemakers not due to malfunction. Am J Cardiol 1970; 25 (3) 344-348
• 11 Curtis J, Walls J, Boley T , et al. Influence of atrioventricular synchrony on hemodynamics in patients with normal and low ejection fractions following open heart surgery. Am Surg 1986; 52 (2) 93-96
• 12 Crystal E, Connolly SJ, Sleik K, Ginger TJ, Yusuf S. Interventions on prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2002; 106 (1) 75-80
• 13 Bethea BT, Salazar JD, Grega MA , et al. Determining the utility of temporary pacing wires after coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79 (1) 104-107
• 14 Foster AH, Gold MR, McLaughlin JS. Acute hemodynamic effects of atrio-biventricular pacing in humans. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59 (2) 294-300
• 15 Weisse U, Isgro F, Werling Ch, Lehmann A, Saggau W. Impact of atrio-biventricular pacing to poor left-ventricular function after CABG. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 50 (3) 131-135